Jump to content


You Ask, We Reply - March 23, 2012


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
229 replies to this topic

awesomeguy1113 #21 Posted Mar 24 2012 - 00:09

    Private

  • Players
  • 5005 battles
  • 2
  • [INSNE] INSNE
  • Member since:
    08-05-2011
will there be 4 players in platoon in update 7.2

SuperJaws100 #22 Posted Mar 24 2012 - 00:13

    Captain

  • Players
  • 16753 battles
  • 1,290
  • Member since:
    06-07-2011

View PostHawk819, on Mar 23 2012 - 23:30, said:

Yes, save it for the T-55 Medium Tank: http://www.militaryf...asp?armor_id=20

It played a pivotal role in the Six Days War against Israel. Egypt and Jordan used it extensively in that conflict. Russian made, the T-55 proved to be a rather disappoint in replacing the T-54.

This'll be one of the T10 Mediums.

The T55 could be easily destroyed by M48 Pattons! (This confuses me is this the Patton II, because there is already an M46 Patton....).


And even the WW2 Era Centurion!

SuperJaws100 #23 Posted Mar 24 2012 - 00:14

    Captain

  • Players
  • 16753 battles
  • 1,290
  • Member since:
    06-07-2011
Devs,

Will there be Teir 11+ tanks? I know that you couldnt possibly add the M1A1 or Leopard II, but other tanks?

Valkeiper #24 Posted Mar 24 2012 - 01:07

    Major

  • Players
  • 8176 battles
  • 2,018
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011

View PostSuperJaws100, on Mar 24 2012 - 00:14, said:

Devs,

Will there be Teir 11+ tanks? I know that you couldnt possibly add the M1A1 or Leopard II, but other tanks?

nah, if the 'tiers were to continue far enough, the Abrams, Leopard II, and Merkava IV would have tiers in the high 20s or low 30s. The Merkava V would definitely be the low 30s.

ijazR #25 Posted Mar 24 2012 - 01:10

    Sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 16278 battles
  • 167
  • Member since:
    09-16-2010

Will you ever reveal how much the crew skill actually influences the tank performance?
We will not disclose these numbers



so no one other than me have a problem with THIS ^

Valkeiper #26 Posted Mar 24 2012 - 01:15

    Major

  • Players
  • 8176 battles
  • 2,018
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011

View Postawesomeguy1113, on Mar 24 2012 - 00:09, said:

will there be 4 players in platoon in update 7.2

hmmm... WG is looking to make $$$ (of course). The present system does not give them $$$.

I think if they required a player to have a premium account to start a platoon, that would work. They could then put in the stipulation two non-premium players and two premium players could join his platoon (for a total of five players and 3 premium accounts).

I personally would add a stipulation that the platoon leader's vehicle states the HIGHEST tier of the platoon and no member of that platoon could be three or more tiers lower (they could be the same tier, but not higher and not more than 2 lower).

Cloon #27 Posted Mar 24 2012 - 01:21

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 13009 battles
  • 39
  • Member since:
    12-04-2011

Quote

Dear developers, can you tell me please if we will be able to research/purchase new crew skills with gold?

New crew skills will not be purchasable with gold as it could be an essential combat advantage.


Am I the only one who laughed at that?  Thanks WG so much for your concern over players paying for in game advantages.  Sure glad gold ammo and consumables offer no essential combat advantages.

FaustianQ #28 Posted Mar 24 2012 - 01:22

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 18719 battles
  • 7,726
  • Member since:
    07-13-2010

View PostijazR, on Mar 24 2012 - 01:10, said:

Will you ever reveal how much the crew skill actually influences the tank performance?
We will not disclose these numbers



so no one other than me have a problem with THIS ^
It's SoP for WarGaming, I'd be more bothered by the fact that you're bothered by this, but not bothered by passability, camo, dispersion, normalization, dropoff and detection numbers/mechanics. Most people have given up on WarGaming actually helping the playerbase, and instead actual numbers are left to data miners.

Valkeiper #29 Posted Mar 24 2012 - 01:22

    Major

  • Players
  • 8176 battles
  • 2,018
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011

View PostijazR, on Mar 24 2012 - 01:10, said:

Will you ever reveal how much the crew skill actually influences the tank performance?
We will not disclose these numbers



so no one other than me have a problem with THIS ^

just another example of why WG has such a poor reputation with NA and EU costumers. Quite likely, RU costumers (at least, those who grew under the USSR) still have the instincts which states the costumer has NO SAY in the operations of a service. Since the RU server is WG's largest costumer base, it is understandable why they cater to that server and its skewed bias against anything non-soviet.

konigwolf13 #30 Posted Mar 24 2012 - 01:30

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 7711 battles
  • 539
  • Member since:
    01-18-2011

View PostJay4hand, on Mar 23 2012 - 23:23, said:

I cry SHENANAGINS!!!  These Q&A's are from the RUSSIAN SERVER!!
and were answered earlier this week!

My link

I read yours and felt ripped off reading this, its word for word just about

Luchshound #31 Posted Mar 24 2012 - 01:31

    Private

  • Players
  • 6910 battles
  • 6
  • [AMA] AMA
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011
Do you plan to look into the BDR G1B's MM and either keep it where it is currently at, relative to a KV, or make it comparative to a T1 HT?

duke10152 #32 Posted Mar 24 2012 - 01:33

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 3639 battles
  • 60
  • [SNP] SNP
  • Member since:
    05-07-2011
In the Tankopedia tab, will you add the xp cost in the information too?

egikov #33 Posted Mar 24 2012 - 01:37

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 20606 battles
  • 477
  • Member since:
    08-31-2010
Here is what I'd like tier 10 mediums be: T-62 and M60. Edit: Even cooler would be T-90 and Abrams M1A2.

However, knowing WG, we will probably get T-55 and M48.

weras27 #34 Posted Mar 24 2012 - 02:00

    Private

  • Players
  • 6405 battles
  • 4
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011
Which up date will you guys include the new game mode?because as far as I recalled you guys have mentioned that your gonna add new game modes such as defending an AI convoy&another was one team will play as defense while the other will play the offense and try to over run the defender

Jetfire13 #35 Posted Mar 24 2012 - 02:25

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 14039 battles
  • 472
  • Member since:
    07-21-2010

View PostSuperJaws100, on Mar 24 2012 - 00:13, said:

The T55 could be easily destroyed by M48 Pattons! (This confuses me is this the Patton II, because there is already an M46 Patton....).


And even the WW2 Era Centurion!

It would be the Patton III cause there was M46,47 and 48 :Smile_great:

RolandVH #36 Posted Mar 24 2012 - 02:56

    Captain

  • Beta Testers
  • 36253 battles
  • 1,654
  • [XMCX] XMCX
  • Member since:
    12-13-2010

View PostFaustianQ, on Mar 23 2012 - 23:32, said:

I'd vote for T95 as tier 10 medium tank for the U.S.!

But what would the other nations get?

BlackstoneRC #37 Posted Mar 24 2012 - 02:57

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 17192 battles
  • 189
  • Member since:
    08-10-2011

View PostValkeiper, on Mar 24 2012 - 01:15, said:

hmmm... WG is looking to make $$$ (of course). The present system does not give them $$$.

I think if they required a player to have a premium account to start a platoon, that would work. They could then put in the stipulation two non-premium players and two premium players could join his platoon (for a total of five players and 3 premium accounts).

I personally would add a stipulation that the platoon leader's vehicle states the HIGHEST tier of the platoon and no member of that platoon could be three or more tiers lower (they could be the same tier, but not higher and not more than 2 lower).
The last YAWR advised they were dropping the idea of 4 - 5 man platoons citing balancing issues.  I would suggest allowing a 4 - 6 man group, but split them up between the two teams, maybe even keeping voice chat open.

blitzkrieg2000 #38 Posted Mar 24 2012 - 03:09

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 1184 battles
  • 24
  • Member since:
    02-12-2012
Will Churchill and Valentine be part of this tech tree?

Labrat22 #39 Posted Mar 24 2012 - 03:12

    Private

  • Players
  • 6907 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    10-31-2011
To get some British tanks I am using Russian Lend/lease ones.  When the British Tech Tree is started will these tanks be added to the British tree?

TigerHawk #40 Posted Mar 24 2012 - 03:41

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 7279 battles
  • 916
  • Member since:
    09-15-2010

Quote

Dear developers, can you tell me please if we will be able to research/purchase new crew skills with gold?

New crew skills will not be purchasable with gold as it could be an essential combat advantage.

But not at all like GOLD ROUNDS......seriously? Everybody(including you) knows that any cash shop item that gives one player an advantage over another in player vs player combat is just retarded, unfair, and extremely unbalanced, but whatever....


Are you still planning to implement the ability for us to CHOOSE when to use our daily double? If so, when?  I'm seriously tired of getting Himmelsdorf in my S-51 and dying in the first minute to a T-50-2 or something, accomplishing nothing, and then getting a double of 50exp. It sucks. It sucks hard. I want an option that will let me select which victory to use it on to prevent these kinds of tragedies. It was mentioned before(perhaps 3 or 4 months ago?) and then never heard about again.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users