Jump to content


OP!


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
233 replies to this topic

KnightFandragon #221 Posted May 28 2012 - 04:19

    Major

  • Players
  • 4617 battles
  • 6,732
  • Member since:
    05-06-2011

View PostTopcoat, on May 27 2012 - 18:18, said:

if he would have know how to attack a t110e that is7 would have rolled you over. the t110e is real easy to kill, people just need to learn how to do it. The t110e has super soft side and back armour and it takes little to no effort to track it. A teir 5 50-2 can pen its sides and back armour.
You dont need something that powerful to pen the back and side armor of the 103 or 110...I think a Tetrarch will do....64avg pen.....Lol, rear is 38?!  Do the math hahaha....sure, the Dmg per shot wont kill it but still...the simple fact it can pen is a crying shame.

Slakrrrrrr #222 Posted May 28 2012 - 11:00

    Major

  • Players
  • 22233 battles
  • 6,435
  • Member since:
    07-16-2011
it isn't OP, I just wish my poor E-100 could pen it's lower glacis :'(

silverphinex #223 Posted May 28 2012 - 18:26

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 10062 battles
  • 30
  • [-ZZ-] -ZZ-
  • Member since:
    05-17-2012
Whats funny about this whole argument is that the T110 in this game is severly striped down version from what the original paper design was and if thay copied what was on the original specs it probly would slaughter everything i digress tho thay had to strip it down becouse balances sake and how dare those upstart americans have a good tank when from what iv read it just seems a lot of the german and ussr tanks try these peekaboo fights or thay charge out expecting to roflstomp the T110 and go wtf when it dosent turn out that way

KnightFandragon #224 Posted May 28 2012 - 23:19

    Major

  • Players
  • 4617 battles
  • 6,732
  • Member since:
    05-06-2011

View Postsilverphinex, on May 28 2012 - 18:26, said:

Whats funny about this whole argument is that the T110 in this game is severly striped down version from what the original paper design was and if thay copied what was on the original specs it probly would slaughter everything i digress tho thay had to strip it down becouse balances sake and how dare those upstart americans have a good tank when from what iv read it just seems a lot of the german and ussr tanks try these peekaboo fights or thay charge out expecting to roflstomp the T110 and go wtf when it dosent turn out that way

Exactly...they will learn..eventually...maybe......yeah, I doubt it...

silverphinex #225 Posted May 29 2012 - 02:31

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 10062 battles
  • 30
  • [-ZZ-] -ZZ-
  • Member since:
    05-17-2012
Now i can be accused of peekabooing around a corner becouse whats around the corner cant be that dangerous and my sherman met a KV-IS with his gun looking at me but honestly i dont think any tanker in WWII would try playing a game of peekaboo with a german panther or tiger II now i only started a couple weeks ago but iv been doing a lot of reading into what people think now while i find the interesting thing of the possibility of favoritism towards russian tanks (an interesting thaught) but if yu give people with tanks that cant duke it out thay have to find other ways of fighting which once thay actualy get a tank that can take a punch and give some out as well while using what thay learned in tanks that thay had to work to fight while not giveing the Enemy a chance to hit back and then thay use similer tactics with a hammer of a gun that the T110 has just my thaught but it seems to be the main reason thay do as well as thay do

Sorry if i dont make sense

silverphinex #226 Posted May 30 2012 - 07:36

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 10062 battles
  • 30
  • [-ZZ-] -ZZ-
  • Member since:
    05-17-2012
I had one of my thaughs if the rear armor of the T 110 is so bad why dont thay use a dead tank and just reverse aginst it and push makeing your rear your front and your front you rear now your rear has a dead tank for a sheild and your front is now your rear and your only vulnerable from the sides

ultra1437 #227 Posted May 30 2012 - 16:54

    Captain

  • Beta Testers
  • 11503 battles
  • 1,225
  • Member since:
    11-28-2010

View PostDands, on May 26 2012 - 02:16, said:

Can some one explain his reticle movement for me. Does it seem normal to you?

He's always been that way.  Him and within always were twitchy. <3 ya BC.

View Postsilverphinex, on May 30 2012 - 07:36, said:

I had one of my thaughs if the rear armor of the T 110 is so bad why dont thay use a dead tank and just reverse aginst it and push makeing your rear your front and your front you rear now your rear has a dead tank for a sheild and your front is now your rear and your only vulnerable from the sides

Two T95s can do that.  Will have to post a replay of it later, but it works.  Lights fear it.  Only problem is you can't go 12 kph, you can only go 6.

silverphinex #228 Posted May 31 2012 - 05:15

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 10062 battles
  • 30
  • [-ZZ-] -ZZ-
  • Member since:
    05-17-2012
Well if you get swarmed my lites you will be going zero cuz you would be dead XD im nit saying its a perfect solution but if you had a dead tank handy and wanted to push a position

WetCheerios #229 Posted May 31 2012 - 22:00

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 22715 battles
  • 239
  • Member since:
    10-08-2011
Its called a period. One of the many forms of punctuation used in grammar. It helps people discern where one thought ends and another begins. Perhaps even, if there is an actual thought to contemplate at all.

From what I gleaned from your... statement/question? If you push a dead tank while travelling backwards... ffs, then you go about 1/2 KM/h. Arty, that's the big gun tanks that sit around the base, will drop small car sized projectiles, or caps for busting, on your head or in your ass, whichever way you prefer to look at it.

I'm sorry for the tone, but ffs man, try. You know? Just try.

rhino1111 #230 Posted May 31 2012 - 22:28

    Major

  • Players
  • 15885 battles
  • 2,419
  • Member since:
    05-14-2011
T110 is king of pub matches, but it comes with a long list of disadvantages. but on average its driven by more skilled tankers, resulting in alot of n00bz0rz crying "OP, OP"

cause i mean, its easier to cry a tank is OP then face the facts you fail@tanks.

eQuipped #231 Posted Jun 03 2012 - 05:35

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 16292 battles
  • 71
  • Member since:
    06-26-2011

View PostDands, on May 26 2012 - 02:16, said:

Can some one explain his reticle movement for me. Does it seem normal to you?

Thats because you are watching a recording of a replay, this isnt a live recording, he is moving about his tank (camera view wise) as he watches the replay. That is why for instance, when he is out of tank view, his crosshair appears to be going round a corner he can't see round (from the angle the replay is being viewed at).  If he had recorded the replay as it was played you would have seen him aiming round the corners and ignoring the other tanks.


Also regarding OP.
Treat this tank like a TD.  E.G. Track the bugger and get round it.  Keep it tracked and it dies pretty fast.  Also gives you a chance to rack it.
Head to head, with my IS7, I shoot down onto it.  Dies pretty fast if you shoot the front middle right under the turret where the optics are.  In return, plenty of dings on the IS7 (not a good move with the IS4).  Otherwise, shoot the R2D2 stuck on its turret.  Lower plate is soft but hard to get at that close up, but seem to get more damage points in the lower plate.

They are hard work but not as impossible to kill as some would have you believe.  Same for the M103.

rinying #232 Posted Jun 03 2012 - 05:37

    Major

  • Players
  • 11427 battles
  • 5,746
  • Member since:
    04-07-2011

View PostMankoi, on Apr 01 2012 - 00:28, said:

It is Op .
that guy single handedly got -100 with just 3 words......epic troll.

HTRK74JR #233 Posted Jun 03 2012 - 05:56

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 12768 battles
  • 727
  • [TROBS] TROBS
  • Member since:
    01-08-2012

View Postrinying, on Jun 03 2012 - 05:37, said:

that guy single handedly got -100 with just 3 words......epic troll.
no kidding closest i got was a -57. these guys didnt like me making excleent inquires to this guy who claimed 12 kills and still lost, lemme tell ya, if i ever find that thread, im going to tell all of them to go eff themselves

rinying #234 Posted Jun 03 2012 - 06:04

    Major

  • Players
  • 11427 battles
  • 5,746
  • Member since:
    04-07-2011

View PostHTRK74JR, on Jun 03 2012 - 05:56, said:

no kidding closest i got was a -57. these guys didnt like me making excleent inquires to this guy who claimed 12 kills and still lost, lemme tell ya, if i ever find that thread, im going to tell all of them to go eff themselves
yes, but with just 3 inconspicous words i hear ever in world of tanks on a daily basis?




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users