Jump to content


Request: Anime tank skins


  • Please log in to reply
4830 replies to this topic

akh101 #4821 Posted Yesterday, 09:07 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 10004 battles
  • 3,129
  • [KURO] KURO
  • Member since:
    12-12-2011

{lang:macro__view_post}Kuriomato, on Jul 21 2014 - 14:11, said:

oh i miss read your talking about that crappy game warthunder,  where the graphics look like a child made the game correct?

 

 

Buzz off duchbag.

 



Kuriomato #4822 Posted Yesterday, 09:18 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 1645 battles
  • 93
  • [-DRC-] -DRC-
  • Member since:
    05-27-2013
oh don't misunderstand i have a machine that can run it in full  speck with NP at all. its just the game looks like crap in total to me

Edited by Kuriomato, Yesterday, 09:22 PM.


mathwizi2005 #4823 Posted Yesterday, 09:27 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 6782 battles
  • 432
  • Member since:
    09-22-2010
well its a hellava lot better then WoT's graphics, and i run both at max

Edited by mathwizi2005, Yesterday, 09:28 PM.


akh101 #4824 Posted Yesterday, 09:35 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 10004 battles
  • 3,129
  • [KURO] KURO
  • Member since:
    12-12-2011

{lang:macro__view_post}mathwizi2005, on Jul 21 2014 - 15:27, said:

well its a hellava lot better then WoT's graphics, and i run both at max

 

 

agreed..



Kuriomato #4825 Posted Yesterday, 10:58 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 1645 battles
  • 93
  • [-DRC-] -DRC-
  • Member since:
    05-27-2013

i like WOTs it looks better for me when i use the HD modleing system

 



Marseille #4826 Posted Today, 09:56 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 5981 battles
  • 522
  • [COD] COD
  • Member since:
    09-11-2010

Hate to add fuel to the fire, but WoT's "HD" tank remodels are still worse than WT's graphics on medium settings, while at the same time running twice as slow as WT's high graphics setting. And let's keep in mind that WT maps are not only more detailed on the ground, but also have more complex models, larger maps, more targets (that are, or will be, also as equally-detailed as player-controlled models) to shoot at, and just flat out have more content than any map WoT has to offer.

 

It's been said countless times, and I don't know why it hasn't already happened, but WG seriously needs to step away from the increasingly obsolete BigWorld engine and find something more fitting for today's technology. At the very least, an engine with multi-core functionality because that is the norm. WoT's engine is one of the single largest factors that slows this game down, both in the short run and the long run.

 

Oddly enough, with the deplorable state that WT is in right now due to... questionable balancing and a lack of apparent effort to fix it, I'm here instead of there. And to think I originally left WoT for the exact same reason... the irony is suffocating.

 

But, this isn't the right thread to argue about these two games. Even though I've already given my two cents about it. :veryhappy:


Edited by Marseille, Today, 10:05 AM.


mathwizi2005 #4827 Posted Today, 04:53 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 6782 battles
  • 432
  • Member since:
    09-22-2010
well we got Armored Warfare on the horizon heading into Beta test

Peo01 #4828 Posted Today, 05:09 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 146 battles
  • 204
  • Member since:
    07-04-2012

{lang:macro__view_post}Marseille, on Jul 22 2014 - 09:56, said:

 

But, this isn't the right thread to argue about these two games. Even though I've already given my two cents about it.

 

To be fair the original Big World engine has long been exchanged for a new one specialised for the game.

(The original engine was an MMORPG engine...)

 

Graphics wise WT is Crysis and WoT is BF1942.

Seriously... look at the Forgotten Hope mod for BF1942 and compare it to WoT's graphics.

Forgotten Hope has vehicles with the graphical quality between WoT's non-HD and HD models... ... that's... pretty... bad...

 

Gameplay wise WoT is way superior, partly due to WT being in an early stage and mostly because Gaijin is a bunch of.... "special" people.

They seem intend on re-doing the same mistakes Wargaming made in the first place instead of learning from ther belarussian mates.

"Let's put the Panther II against T-54s and IS-4, clearly no other game has proven yet that this just doesn't work!"

Except when the Panther II was a tier IX medium in WoT and the IS-4 was a tier IX heavy... but hey...

 

On another note:

I'm still waiting for Gaijin to finish easily skinnable tank skins the same way the plane skins work.

In the meantime I made a quick StuG III Ausf. G skin (Hurr durr I added a 3 decals because Wehrmacht Grau master race) for one of the VNs

that is currently being made.

 



Metagoros #4829 Posted Today, 05:11 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 15383 battles
  • 418
  • [BNR] BNR
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011
Am I like the only person able to run WoT at max graphics and have 100+ fps?

AuraDesru #4830 Posted Today, 05:18 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 9662 battles
  • 1,375
  • [BUNEH] BUNEH
  • Member since:
    12-12-2011

{lang:macro__view_post}Metagoros, on Jul 22 2014 - 09:11, said:

Am I like the only person able to run WoT at max graphics and have 100+ fps?


Not anymore because I just got a new rig :D

If armored warfare is really good

I'm quitting wot

I'm super tired of the korean war and WW2 time era. I want something modern...

pls gib ace combat infinty on pc



Peo01 #4831 Posted Today, 05:48 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 146 battles
  • 204
  • Member since:
    07-04-2012

{lang:macro__view_post}Metagoros, on Jul 22 2014 - 17:11, said:

Am I like the only person able to run WoT at max graphics and have 100+ fps?

 

90-120 when I'm not using Fraps or Twitch and don't play around in other games in the background.

60-70 when doing one of the above and 30-40 on Windstorm, no idea why only on that map.

 

Then again I have a feeling 80% of your fps in WoT has to do with the system you're running and how well WoT is optimised for it.

I can run Fraps in WT and keep the fps between 120-200 (Not that I can optically see a difference above 60), but in WoT it makes the game go nuts.


Edited by Peo01, Today, 05:48 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users