World of Tanks One Year Anniversary Video
Emorex
Apr 12 2012
One year of massive tank assault. One year of impressive combat. One year live with you!
Full news text
Full news text
Fattty
Apr 12 2012
Stop teasing me with physics. I get all excited, and then I don't know what to do with myself.
Lert
Apr 12 2012
I have to say, excellent trailer. Except for one thing:
Why that experimental dubstep / rock / screamo crossover music? Why not some good, oldfashioned, honest, raw heavy metal? After all, that's what we're driving, as well.
Why that experimental dubstep / rock / screamo crossover music? Why not some good, oldfashioned, honest, raw heavy metal? After all, that's what we're driving, as well.
Spanktankk
Apr 12 2012
New damage category: Death by Squashing from Above
...think the Chaffee goes fast enough to catch air???
...think the Chaffee goes fast enough to catch air???
Antare
Apr 12 2012
Xtreme music for xtreme tank air.
Cant wait to hold tank tricks competition once physics goes live.
Cant wait to hold tank tricks competition once physics goes live.
USMarine
Apr 12 2012
Lert, on Apr 12 2012 - 16:12, said:
I have to say, excellent trailer. Except for one thing:
Why that experimental dubstep / rock / screamo crossover music? Why not some good, oldfashioned, honest, raw heavy metal? After all, that's what we're driving, as well.
Why that experimental dubstep / rock / screamo crossover music? Why not some good, oldfashioned, honest, raw heavy metal? After all, that's what we're driving, as well.
The song is great though. Went perfect with the trailer.
Too bad it's falsely advertising Physics though. Who knows? They might ninja it in on the one year anniversary,
---
I'd actually like a copy of the song haha.
Unfortunately - Subsource's new EP hasn't released yet.
Deathskyz
Apr 12 2012
Physics!!! I wonder if my E-100 can fly...
Perhaps ill see my grounded Nyan Hetzer finally fly...
Perhaps ill see my grounded Nyan Hetzer finally fly...
Dockmaster
Apr 12 2012
I liked the clan logos and their size on the turret...anyone else notice?
SteelRonin
Apr 12 2012
You saw physics, and when the tank is in the air you can see the tracks mark in the ground, dafuq
Lert
Apr 12 2012
I noticed gaming-magazine awards on the tanks, not clan-logo's. Probably just a only-for-the-trailer type deal.
Zergling
Apr 12 2012
24 million registered users and 360 battles played = 15 battles per user.
That is incredibly low, indicating just how severe the player retention rate is.
That is incredibly low, indicating just how severe the player retention rate is.
bronco330
Apr 12 2012
Zergling, on Apr 12 2012 - 16:52, said:
24 million registered users and 360 battles played = 15 battles per user.
That is incredibly low, indicating just how severe the player retention rate is.
That is incredibly low, indicating just how severe the player retention rate is.
But Snib's stats do give an indication that the retention rate beyond 100 or 1000 battles isn't high. Granted I have no idea what actually constitutes a good retention rate in the world of online gaming...
WontEndWell
Apr 12 2012
Zergling, on Apr 12 2012 - 16:52, said:
24 million registered users and 360 battles played = 15 battles per user.
That is incredibly low, indicating just how severe the player retention rate is.
That is incredibly low, indicating just how severe the player retention rate is.
I wonder how many of those accounts are duplicates from the server split and accounts existing players made to play on the other servers. I'm sure the doubled beta accounts skewed those numbers a bit.
cLAy_piGeon
Apr 12 2012
Been here since beta on my other account(Arquem)and ,
I LOVETHIS GAME!
love IT!
Lert
Apr 12 2012
Zergling, on Apr 12 2012 - 16:52, said:
24 million registered users and 360 battles played = 15 battles per user.
That is incredibly low, indicating just how severe the player retention rate is.
That is incredibly low, indicating just how severe the player retention rate is.
13 billion vehicles destroyed in 350 million battles equals 37.1 vehicles per battle. Which I find rather questionable, considering the fact that each battle has a max of 30 vehicles, and on average ~25% survives.
So SOMETHING isn't right with those stats.
If the 13 billion destroyed is accurate and we take a 25% survival rate as well as 30 vehicles per battle, then 13 billion = 75% of the total vehicles that taken part in battle, or 17290000000 total vehicles that have taken part in battle. Divide this by 30 and we get 576333333 or 576 million battles. More than 350 million, but still not very many compared to the number of registered users listed.
Velor
Apr 12 2012
Quote
"World of Tanks team would like to thank the devoted players from all around the world for being with us throughout this massive year!
Stay tuned! We've got lots of new features to share."
Stay tuned! We've got lots of new features to share."
After seeing the video the mystery feature better be physics...


