Jump to content


Military Month Post meridiem Challenge


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
97 replies to this topic

Desdichado #81 Posted May 27 2012 - 01:36

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 18761 battles
  • 531
  • Member since:
    06-15-2011
Or maybe they knew such a dispute would have had no basis in fact; much more satisfying then to bitterpost in the court of public opinion than to await a rejection of a pointless dispute.

macg1991 #82 Posted May 28 2012 - 16:33

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 10168 battles
  • 628
  • Member since:
    07-17-2010
I already talked to kufo, but I want to say thank you all on team Cazadores for the great games. You guys played perfectly and did some things that I did not even know were possible. It was obvious that you put in a lot of work this month, and I wish you the best of luck in your final battle. It's always fun fighting against you guys :Smile_Default:

Logos #83 Posted May 29 2012 - 00:29

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 16208 battles
  • 89
  • Member since:
    03-12-2011

View Postmacg1991, on May 28 2012 - 16:33, said:

I already talked to kufo, but I want to say thank you all on team Cazadores for the great games. You guys played perfectly and did some things that I did not even know were possible. It was obvious that you put in a lot of work this month, and I wish you the best of luck in your final battle. It's always fun fighting against you guys :Smile_Default:

As always its an honor to play with SIMP, awesome games!!! you challenge us to give our best!!

Can´t wait for E3 match. :Smile_great:

GG´S!!!

Edited by Logos, May 29 2012 - 00:30.


kufo #84 Posted May 29 2012 - 02:52

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 23990 battles
  • 234
  • Member since:
    03-14-2011
On behalf on Cazadores y I must say, nice games guys, you had a very nice strategy. You deserve the championship. We promise it will not be so easy next time!!!

Edited by kufo, May 29 2012 - 03:02.


Relics #85 Posted May 29 2012 - 02:59

    First lieutenant

  • Community Contributor
  • 11050 battles
  • 637
  • Member since:
    02-14-2011

View Postkufo, on May 29 2012 - 02:52, said:

On behalf on cazadores y I must say, nice games guys, you had a very nice strategy. You deserve the championship. We promise it will not be so easy next time!!!

Great fights Cazadores! Look forward to seeing you in future matches.

Sonork #86 Posted May 29 2012 - 03:19

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 11279 battles
  • 160
  • Member since:
    04-06-2011
Grats Nagatron and crew, for not only winning the tourney but also having the best team name. lolz.  After we took a pounding from Cazadores it would take no small amount of planning to beat them.  Nice one.

Edited by Sonork, May 29 2012 - 03:27.


nagatron #87 Posted May 29 2012 - 03:34

    First lieutenant

  • Community Contributor
  • 14233 battles
  • 512
  • Member since:
    06-03-2011
Great games Cazadores! It's no mystery how you guys got to the finals.

Edit:
I'd missed this before.

View Postkufo, on May 29 2012 - 02:52, said:

On behalf on Cazadores y I must say, nice games guys, you had a very nice strategy. You deserve the championship. We promise it will not be so easy next time!!!
+1. I don't know if my heart can take anything more difficult than that. You were a great t-50.

Edited by nagatron, May 29 2012 - 04:06.


Alajhsm_Arabin #88 Posted May 29 2012 - 04:39

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 25179 battles
  • 500
  • Member since:
    05-14-2011
Good games guys, you stomped us :Smile-hiding: ... Also our Admiral Ackbar was right, it was a trap :Smile_confused:.

BarrooM #89 Posted May 29 2012 - 19:10

    Major

  • Community Contributor
  • 15485 battles
  • 4,697
  • Member since:
    02-02-2011

View PostDesdichado, on May 27 2012 - 01:36, said:

Or maybe they knew such a dispute would have had no basis in fact; much more satisfying then to bitterpost in the court of public opinion than to await a rejection of a pointless dispute.


Well first off, I was not aware of such dispute rules (as they have changed since the last time I'd played in a tourny). Secondly, we drew out 3 times in a row to the same turtle after scouting 80% of the map and not being sixth sensed or lighting anything. Thirdly, we had 3 Clan Wars battles at the same time and needed to press the issue in order to fill teams for those defenses. We could not sit and draw out 5 more times and successfully defend our territory. After the first 3 draws it was clear what was going on, flashback to Redshire.

As you suggested, we did in fact concentrate on Clan Wars that particular night. Hopefully after some internal adjustments, CW won't interfere with tournaments (much).


Grats to the other Forge team for making it to the big dance and taking it all ~>

MVP goes to the Spainish guy imo.

nagatron #90 Posted May 29 2012 - 23:41

    First lieutenant

  • Community Contributor
  • 14233 battles
  • 512
  • Member since:
    06-03-2011

View PostAlajhsm_Arabin, on May 29 2012 - 04:39, said:

Good games guys, you stomped us :Smile-hiding: ... Also our Admiral Ackbar was right, it was a trap :Smile_confused:.
TrapSense is BestSense!

Desdichado #91 Posted May 30 2012 - 03:54

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 18761 battles
  • 531
  • Member since:
    06-15-2011

BarrooM said:

Well first off, I was not aware of such dispute rules (as they have changed since the last time I'd played in a tourny).

Excuse #1.

BarrooM said:

Secondly, we drew out 3 times in a row to the same turtle after scouting 80% of the map and not being sixth sensed or lighting anything.

Excuse #2.

BarrooM said:

Thirdly, we had 3 Clan Wars battles at the same time and needed to press the issue in order to fill teams for those defenses.

Excuse #3.

Three excuses in one post--not half bad.  Now if you'll scroll up to Macg's post, you'll see... 0 excuses and him congratulating the team that beat his.  That's the difference between a champion and lesser competitors.  Champions don't feel the need to make excuses.  See how that works?

BarrooM #92 Posted May 30 2012 - 15:06

    Major

  • Community Contributor
  • 15485 battles
  • 4,697
  • Member since:
    02-02-2011

View PostDesdichado, on May 30 2012 - 03:54, said:

Excuse #1.



Excuse #2.



Excuse #3.

Three excuses in one post--not half bad.  Now if you'll scroll up to Macg's post, you'll see... 0 excuses and him congratulating the team that beat his.  That's the difference between a champion and lesser competitors.  Champions don't feel the need to make excuses.  See how that works?

Facts are now excuses, cool story Captain Nobody. You may want to check my e-creds (Sorry I don't care enough to paste every single thing I've done of signifigance in in this pretend tank game in my sig as it only allows me 5 lines) I've been on the winning side of things and done a lot more than you will ever dream of.

Please carry on, tell me how to be a champion while I continute to laugh at what a pubbie all star you are pretend to be.

AntonioHandsome #93 Posted May 30 2012 - 15:50

    Major

  • Players
  • 13121 battles
  • 6,206
  • Member since:
    01-31-2011
Who caaaaaaaares, I won me some 12k gold. That's the end of the story.

Desdichado #94 Posted May 30 2012 - 17:33

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 18761 battles
  • 531
  • Member since:
    06-15-2011

View PostBarrooM, on May 30 2012 - 15:06, said:

Facts are now excuses, cool story Captain Nobody. You may want to check my e-creds (Sorry I don't care enough to paste every single thing I've done of signifigance in in this pretend tank game in my sig as it only allows me 5 lines) I've been on the winning side of things and done a lot more than you will ever dream of.

Please carry on, tell me how to be a champion while I continute to laugh at what a pubbie all star you are pretend to be.

This man(?) appears to be upset.  Would you like a lollipop?

nagatron #95 Posted May 30 2012 - 19:33

    First lieutenant

  • Community Contributor
  • 14233 battles
  • 512
  • Member since:
    06-03-2011

View PostAntonioHandsome, on May 30 2012 - 15:50, said:

Who caaaaaaaares, I won me some 12k gold. That's the end of the story.
Posted Image

Lowecore #96 Posted May 31 2012 - 00:20

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 11693 battles
  • 454
  • Member since:
    09-17-2011
an easy fix for camping in skirmishes would be to allow 1 arty on a team. Just designate the tier like the rest of the tanks. You could alos remove drawds altogetherand have the team that has caused themost damage win a round in where the time has elapsed

AntonioHandsome #97 Posted May 31 2012 - 00:30

    Major

  • Players
  • 13121 battles
  • 6,206
  • Member since:
    01-31-2011

View PostLowecore, on May 31 2012 - 00:20, said:

an easy fix for camping in skirmishes would be to allow 1 arty on a team. Just designate the tier like the rest of the tanks. You could alos remove drawds altogetherand have the team that has caused themost damage win a round in where the time has elapsed
Artilleries are (were) allowed on this tournament.

Lowecore #98 Posted May 31 2012 - 17:10

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 11693 battles
  • 454
  • Member since:
    09-17-2011
woops, this was the tier 5 tourny, nm =P