Jump to content


20 games required to post.


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
150 replies to this topic

bdplaya #81 Posted May 14 2012 - 20:55

    Captain

  • Players
  • 17590 battles
  • 1,836
  • [-3WW-] -3WW-
  • Member since:
    05-01-2011
Post after 100 battles it would be better

_Carbon_ #82 Posted May 15 2012 - 21:44

    Sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 16719 battles
  • 140
  • [DERP] DERP
  • Member since:
    12-13-2010
Would have been nice if they kept the old forum layout/features. This new forum is potatoes. Its got like, less features than a WP blog comments section now.

Mogruk #83 Posted May 16 2012 - 01:58

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 3316 battles
  • 168
  • [NECRO] NECRO
  • Member since:
    10-26-2011

Darrigaaz, on May 10 2012 - 22:46, said:

I'm wondering if this is why I'm seeing a lot more afk tier 1 tanks when I'm playing my tier 2 for fun.

Doesn't an account start with 4 tier 1 tanks?  Is it possible that they can hit battle, leave battle, and cycle all 4 tanks to get 20 matches in about 20 minutes?

If possible, could it be changed to instead of needing 20 battles, they would need 20 kills?  This would completely cause somebody to actually play those 15-25 battles it takes.  It's pretty hard to get kills while not actively playing.
I am sure that they can.
This is nothing but more window dressing and smoke up your skirt.

I have to LOL at all the apologists for WG, don't worry guys, they are killing the game fine without your help but hey keep drinking the kool-aid and supporting their broken business model by throwing money at a very shallow even by 1998 standards, game.

KilljoyCutter #84 Posted May 18 2012 - 15:01

    Major

  • Players
  • 8469 battles
  • 27,183
  • Member since:
    05-07-2011

Darrigaaz, on May 10 2012 - 22:46, said:

I'm wondering if this is why I'm seeing a lot more afk tier 1 tanks when I'm playing my tier 2 for fun.

Doesn't an account start with 4 tier 1 tanks?  Is it possible that they can hit battle, leave battle, and cycle all 4 tanks to get 20 matches in about 20 minutes?

If possible, could it be changed to instead of needing 20 battles, they would need 20 kills?  This would completely cause somebody to actually play those 15-25 battles it takes.  It's pretty hard to get kills while not actively playing.

That might work.

I notice that the gold spammers are back.  You're probably right as to how they're doing it.

Quillan668 #85 Posted May 18 2012 - 16:20

    Captain

  • Players
  • 4650 battles
  • 1,491
  • Member since:
    11-02-2011
Both the gold spammers I've seen since this was implemented (one last night, one this morning) showed zero games on their profile. I didn't notice which forums they posted on, though, so I suppose it could have been one of the unlocked forums.

Wraith27 #86 Posted May 18 2012 - 21:42

    Captain

  • Players
  • 17736 battles
  • 1,287
  • [RMNT] RMNT
  • Member since:
    05-09-2012
Very good idea.  Wont make it impossible for the spammers, but it will make it harder for them.

Nerfarious_Sardoodledom #87 Posted May 19 2012 - 21:36

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 17584 battles
  • 72
  • Member since:
    07-13-2011

Wraith27, on May 18 2012 - 21:42, said:

Very good idea.  Wont make it impossible for the spammers, but it will make it harder for them.

My bad... I posted about the red screen fix on every topic. People keep raging about it in-game. I was just trying to help...

markodash #88 Posted May 20 2012 - 01:48

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 21959 battles
  • 499
  • [G_W_S] G_W_S
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011
can we get a veteran tankers section for those with a few thousand battles?

Gunadie #89 Posted May 21 2012 - 07:41

    Major

  • Players
  • 46407 battles
  • 4,812
  • Member since:
    08-20-2011
20 games ? Is that all !
200 games before posts should be more like it.
No offence Tan, but even that number may  still be to low.

Radix4257 #90 Posted May 21 2012 - 20:20

    Captain

  • Beta Testers
  • 23810 battles
  • 1,497
  • Member since:
    12-13-2010
Surely has something to do with the reduction of 'Buy Gold' spams.

Talikarni #91 Posted May 22 2012 - 16:32

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 29050 battles
  • 756
  • Member since:
    11-07-2011
I would say minimum 100 battles to post, since 20 is not enough to get a proper taste of the game, and at least 100 battles in you get more answers, learning them yourself, than you did after 20.

OtisDriftwood #92 Posted May 22 2012 - 20:38

    Sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 27696 battles
  • 113
  • [ANON_] ANON_
  • Member since:
    01-10-2011
genius

Fodder #93 Posted May 26 2012 - 18:42

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 8336 battles
  • 631
  • Member since:
    09-08-2010

markodash, on May 20 2012 - 01:48, said:

can we get a veteran tankers section for those with a few thousand battles?

^ What I said already.  /agree

KilljoyCutter #94 Posted May 27 2012 - 17:58

    Major

  • Players
  • 8469 battles
  • 27,183
  • Member since:
    05-07-2011
How about an IQ test to play the game?

I have to quit for the weekend.  The idiots, the part-timers, the kids, the lolzers, the griefers, and the fools are out in full force.

If you are reading this, and you're one of those guys who only plays once in a while, and can't be arsed to learn anything about the game, then do the rest of us a favor, go find something else to play, and stop ruining the game for those of us who give a damn about being at least competent.

eisen1973 #95 Posted Jun 01 2012 - 05:55

    Major

  • Players
  • 68408 battles
  • 2,612
  • [ARMIS] ARMIS
  • Member since:
    11-04-2011
I see it as a positive thing, too. But honestly I don't think that 20 games is enough to stop anything.  Actually I think that the number of games played does have not much to do with the player's attitude toward the game and the behaviour on the forums. I bet u all those scammers have played more than 500 battles, cause it's then when they start to feel "at ease". I would suggest a +10 k battles forum, for the Elders on the game, and so on, descending, maybe. Cause sometimes the older players comments are so arrogant and full of despective words toward the newbies.

eisen1973 #96 Posted Jun 01 2012 - 05:59

    Major

  • Players
  • 68408 battles
  • 2,612
  • [ARMIS] ARMIS
  • Member since:
    11-04-2011

KilljoyCutter, on May 27 2012 - 17:58, said:

How about an IQ test to play the game?

I have to quit for the weekend.  The idiots, the part-timers, the kids, the lolzers, the griefers, and the fools are out in full force.

If you are reading this, and you're one of those guys who only plays once in a while, and can't be arsed to learn anything about the game, then do the rest of us a favor, go find something else to play, and stop ruining the game for those of us who give a damn about being at least competent.
That's why people keep asking a MM based on age or skills, or battles fought. I agree with you that having such "weekend players" is such a disgrace for all of us who really loves the game.

rinying #97 Posted Jun 01 2012 - 06:02

    Major

  • Players
  • 11427 battles
  • 5,746
  • Member since:
    04-07-2011

KilljoyCutter, on May 27 2012 - 17:58, said:

How about an IQ test to play the game?

I have to quit for the weekend.  The idiots, the part-timers, the kids, the lolzers, the griefers, and the fools are out in full force.

If you are reading this, and you're one of those guys who only plays once in a while, and can't be arsed to learn anything about the game, then do the rest of us a favor, go find something else to play, and stop ruining the game for those of us who give a damn about being at least competent.
agreed. i saw a churchill ran from a m4 sherman, i called him out on it, crushed the m4 sherman in my churchill, managed to take out 2 others without even getting injured really. i looked him up, 100 games played, 10 in his churchill. while we are at it, can we get a minimum of 1 tier below whatever tank you want to buy with gold?

GhostUSN #98 Posted Jun 03 2012 - 20:24

    Major

  • Players
  • 8956 battles
  • 4,410
  • Member since:
    04-23-2012
bad idea my first 10-15 posts where topics asking for help on certain issues.

if I was forced to call customer service I would have quit the game and pretty much I would tell all my gamer friends that this game is crap.

GhostUSN #99 Posted Jun 03 2012 - 20:25

    Major

  • Players
  • 8956 battles
  • 4,410
  • Member since:
    04-23-2012

rinying, on Jun 01 2012 - 06:02, said:

agreed. i saw a churchill ran from a m4 sherman, i called him out on it, crushed the m4 sherman in my churchill, managed to take out 2 others without even getting injured really. i looked him up, 100 games played, 10 in his churchill. while we are at it, can we get a minimum of 1 tier below whatever tank you want to buy with gold?

you realize the people that are buying gold is whats keeping this game free to play?

Starzfan #100 Posted Jun 09 2012 - 17:31

    Major

  • Players
  • 14180 battles
  • 2,502
  • [A-WLV] A-WLV
  • Member since:
    07-10-2011

mrasianman2, on May 05 2012 - 01:11, said:

Thank you. Now we won't have new players thinking they know everything about the game and that anything they don't know is a hack. But I sense many more troll posts in the Newcomer sections...

Love the way you dismiss a new players posts as troll posts.  A little stuck up are we??  Remember, you were a "troll" once.   I dont support minimum game numbers. All players should have the right to use the forum, 2 games or 2000.




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users