Jump to content

Support

Mistake! 7.3 update note (TD should not be able to mount KwK)

Started by God_Of_Death_EX , May 07 2012 - 11:53

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
21 replies to this topic

God_Of_Death_EX #-19 Posted May 07 2012 - 11:53

    Major

  •
  • Players
  • 5969 battles
  • 2,125
  • Member since:
    11-20-2011

Quote

Added vehicles, available for supertesters only: Soviet heavy tank IS-6 (tier 8) and German TD JagdTiger 8.8cm KwK 43 L/71 (tier 8).

The abbrv. KwK refers to KampfwagenKanone
Meaning Tank Gun (according to Google Translate)
And is for turreted tanks only
This is the historical gun for the Tiger II

The gun on the Premium JgT should be 8.8cm PaK 43 L/7
The abbrv. PaK refers to  Panzerbwehrkanone
Meaning Anti Tank Gun (according to Google translate)
PaKs should be mounted on TDs instead of the KwKs
This is the historical gun for the JagdPanther

Hope the DEVs can correct this

cheesellama #-18 Posted May 07 2012 - 12:00

    Major

  •
  • Players
  • 5500 battles
  • 9,483
  • Member since:
    06-05-2011
No way! Who would've thought that just changing an abbreviation would affect the game so much! Oh wait, it doesn't.

No offense intended, but I'm just saying, even though that's a good point, does it make much of a difference?

Sabertoothpython #-17 Posted May 07 2012 - 12:06

    Major

  •
  • Beta Testers
  • 2814 battles
  • 2,046
  • Member since:
    09-01-2010
Why cant a tank destroyer have a tank gun? Fixed gun emplacments can. Ships can.

Someone please tell me

SHISHKABOB #-16 Posted May 07 2012 - 12:07

    Major

  •
  • Beta Testers
  • 8209 battles
  • 11,313
  • Member since:
    12-06-2010

View Postcheesellama, on May 07 2012 - 12:00, said:

No way! Who would've thought that just changing an abbreviation would affect the game so much! Oh wait, it doesn't.

No offense intended, but I'm just saying, even though that's a good point, does it make much of a difference?

one of the biggest selling points of the game is "get in a WW2 era tank and drive it around"

realistic looking tanks and names is a part of the allure. Anyone who knows much about German tanks and weapons will know the difference between KwK and PaK, and to them it *is* a big deal.


However, in this case, I feel like it was just a typo. As we've seen before, whoever is translating these things from Russians is probably often in a hurry and sometimes makes mistakes, like we all do.

KrasnayaZvezda #-15 Posted May 07 2012 - 12:08

    Captain

  •
  • Beta Testers
  • 8765 battles
  • 1,730
  • Member since:
    07-18-2010
No offense, but it was discussed few times previously, and its name would be changed after the release as it seems that WG is well aware of it.

Tanker579 #-14 Posted May 07 2012 - 12:25

    Sergeant

  •
  • Players
  • 4123 battles
  • 119
  • Member since:
    09-14-2011

View PostSabertoothpython, on May 07 2012 - 12:06, said:

Why cant a tank destroyer have a tank gun? Fixed gun emplacments can. Ships can.

Someone please tell me
A tank destroyer can't have a tank gun becuase it's a Tank Destroyer.Not a tank. Duh :D

Tanker579 #-13 Posted May 07 2012 - 12:28

    Sergeant

  •
  • Players
  • 4123 battles
  • 119
  • Member since:
    09-14-2011
a tank destroyer cant have a tank gun because it's a Tank Destroyer. Duh :D

Sabertoothpython #-12 Posted May 07 2012 - 12:34

    Major

  •
  • Beta Testers
  • 2814 battles
  • 2,046
  • Member since:
    09-01-2010

View PostTanker579, on May 07 2012 - 12:28, said:

a tank destroyer cant have a tank gun because it's a Tank Destroyer. Duh :D

Thats just a name. Anyway, can the gun on a tank not destroy another tank?

Thus, it is also a tank destroyer

God_Of_Death_EX #-11 Posted May 07 2012 - 12:38

    Major

  •
  • Players
  • 5969 battles
  • 2,125
  • Member since:
    11-20-2011
btw according to a removed russian tankopeida page
the gun will be released in "Ausfuhrung A" version
that means even u buy this tank, u cannot unlock the regular PaK / KwK 43 L/71
also the radio will be FuG7A with 710m signal range, and not compatible with the regular FuG7

Edited by God_Of_Death_EX, May 07 2012 - 12:38.

SHISHKABOB #-10 Posted May 07 2012 - 12:38

    Major

  •
  • Beta Testers
  • 8209 battles
  • 11,313
  • Member since:
    12-06-2010

View PostSabertoothpython, on May 07 2012 - 12:34, said:

Thats just a name. Anyway, can the gun on a tank not destroy another tank?

Thus, it is also a tank destroyer

the military loves proper designations

tank destroyers get anti-tank weapons

tanks get tank guns

there's a difference, but it's not very obvious in this game, since all we do in this game is fight other tanks and SPGs

Lert #-9 Posted May 07 2012 - 12:41

    Major

  •
  • Community Contributor
  • 21669 battles
  • 15,631
  • Member since:
    09-02-2010
The difference is in the fact that PaK guns in this game seem to have better accuracy, aim time and ROF than KwK guns. That's all. I'm sure the stats of the gun won't change based on what the devs call it but be based completely on gameplay balance, but, however minor, it's still a mistake: the gun should be labeled PaK rather than KwK.

FujiTnak #-8 Posted May 07 2012 - 12:57

    Sergeant

  •
  • Beta Testers
  • 2024 battles
  • 198
  • Member since:
    12-21-2010

View PostGod_Of_Death_EX, on May 07 2012 - 11:53, said:

The abbrv. KwK refers to KampfwagenKanone
Meaning Tank Gun (according to Google Translate)
And is for turreted tanks only
This is the historical gun for the Tiger II

The gun on the Premium JgT should be 8.8cm PaK 43 L/7
The abbrv. PaK refers to  Panzerbwehrkanone
Meaning Anti Tank Gun (according to Google translate)
PaKs should be mounted on TDs instead of the KwKs
This is the historical gun for the JagdPanther

Hope the DEVs can correct this

Yup, went back and looked. The JagdPanther uses that exact cannon, and its labelled PaK 43. It will most likely be fixed. :Smile_honoring:

God_Of_Death_EX #-7 Posted May 07 2012 - 12:59

    Major

  •
  • Players
  • 5969 battles
  • 2,125
  • Member since:
    11-20-2011
and a -1 for me for pointing out mistake?

FujiTnak #-6 Posted May 07 2012 - 13:01

    Sergeant

  •
  • Beta Testers
  • 2024 battles
  • 198
  • Member since:
    12-21-2010

View PostGod_Of_Death_EX, on May 07 2012 - 12:59, said:

and a -1 for me for pointing out mistake?

No worries, gave you +1 to fix someone elses ignorance. Nice for catching that error B)

frostys #-5 Posted May 07 2012 - 13:05

    First lieutenant

  •
  • Players
  • 6916 battles
  • 530
  • Member since:
    04-01-2011

View PostGod_Of_Death_EX, on May 07 2012 - 12:38, said:

btw according to a removed russian tankopeida page
the gun will be released in "Ausfuhrung A" version
that means even u buy this tank, u cannot unlock the regular PaK / KwK 43 L/71
also the radio will be FuG7A with 710m signal range, and not compatible with the regular FuG7

And that change what? Should all tank be forced to use the same radio set now? My soviet radio works just fine with american radios and german radios so a different set will not make any difference. For all I know, they put a FuG7A on it so people cannot get the FuG7 researched for "free" by buying the new TD. I understand wanting to correct the misstake on the PaK gun but the radio definately has a reason to be different in game.

God_Of_Death_EX #-4 Posted May 07 2012 - 13:11

    Major

  •
  • Players
  • 5969 battles
  • 2,125
  • Member since:
    11-20-2011

View Postfrostys, on May 07 2012 - 13:05, said:

And that change what? Should all tank be forced to use the same radio set now? My soviet radio works just fine with american radios and german radios so a different set will not make any difference. For all I know, they put a FuG7A on it so people cannot get the FuG7 researched for "free" by buying the new TD. I understand wanting to correct the misstake on the PaK gun but the radio definately has a reason to be different in game.

im just telling some facts
not demanding the DEVs to change them

Tishr #-3 Posted May 07 2012 - 13:39

    First lieutenant

  •
  • Players
  • 6532 battles
  • 811
  • Member since:
    05-23-2011
I'd wait and see when the patch goes live bets are the translator just got in a hurry and didn't properly double cheak their work.

Monadnock #-2 Posted May 07 2012 - 14:14

    Sergeant

  •
  • Players
  • 8828 battles
  • 205
  • Member since:
    03-01-2011

View PostGod_Of_Death_EX, on May 07 2012 - 12:59, said:

and a -1 for me for pointing out mistake?

Fixed.  Good catch.

God_Of_Death_EX #-1 Posted May 07 2012 - 14:17

    Major

  •
  • Players
  • 5969 battles
  • 2,125
  • Member since:
    11-20-2011

View PostFujiTnak, on May 07 2012 - 13:01, said:

No worries, gave you +1 to fix someone elses ignorance. Nice for catching that error B)

View PostMonadnock, on May 07 2012 - 14:14, said:

Fixed.  Good catch.

thanks for appreciation, and neutralization of the neg

KilljoyCutter #0 Posted May 07 2012 - 17:46

    Major

  •
  • Players
  • 7680 battles
  • 11,153
  • Member since:
    05-07-2011
Of course, in real life, German tanks and TDs often mounted the same guns, with the difference being just in the name and maybe the mount.

http://en.wikipedia....iki/KwK_43_L/71
Back to Gameplay Discussion


  1. World of Tanks official forum
  2. → World of Tanks Game Discussion
  3. → Gameplay Discussion