Asked in the Poll, would you wait longer in Que for a more even battle?
Longer Que's/Better MM
Started by
Kiwiusmc
, May 09 2012 - 05:44
11 replies to this topic
#-18 Posted May 09 2012 - 05:54
-
- Players
- 64 battles
-
7
-
Member since:
11-20-2011
Private
Who would honestly say no to that?
#-17 Posted May 09 2012 - 06:01
-
- Players
- 5387 battles
-
24
-
Member since:
09-06-2011
Corporal
Somebody did!
#-16 Posted May 10 2012 - 01:01
-
- Players
- 7298 battles
-
147
-
Member since:
02-15-2011
Sergeant
Heck yes!
#-15 Posted May 10 2012 - 04:01
-
- Players
- 6457 battles
-
179
-
Member since:
04-19-2011
Sergeant
Said this more than once: yes I would be willing to wait some for better MM, though it's been surprisingly good lately for me (doesn't hurt that I've been mostly using the Hellcat to grind credits, which can hurt most anything anyway, so "fair MM" is more lax than for most other tanks I've played).
#-14 Posted May 10 2012 - 08:29
-
- Players
- 16409 battles
-
1,023
-
Member since:
02-19-2011
Captain
Matchmaker has alot of options to make it better.
5v5 and 10v10 matches, lower tier spread to 2 tier(tier 6-8 matches, example), wait longer for que than .5 seconds.
5v5 and 10v10 matches, lower tier spread to 2 tier(tier 6-8 matches, example), wait longer for que than .5 seconds.
#-13 Posted May 10 2012 - 22:19
-
- Players
- 10526 battles
-
1,708
-
Member since:
03-28-2011
Captain
a longer queue is not necessary for better MM. A 3 tier battle spread would shuffle the matches tanks get in, not change the inherent numbers on the server. and thus no extra time to wait would be required. In fact a 3 tier battle spread would only encourage more players to stick around as they would finally stop being thrown to the wolves every single round.
#-12 Posted May 10 2012 - 22:24
-
- Players
- 4684 battles
-
275
-
Member since:
05-17-2011
Staff sergeant
I'm having deja vu as i swear this topic has been done before...
#-11 Posted May 11 2012 - 05:10
-
- Players
- 5387 battles
-
24
-
Member since:
09-06-2011
Corporal
You should see a Doctor and get that looked at!
#-10 Posted May 11 2012 - 16:53
-
- Beta Testers
- 4325 battles
-
114
-
Member since:
07-14-2010
Sergeant
I'm sure they had their consumer insights folks study this to determine if the majority of players would rather get in a game quickly, or have a tougher time in the tiering.
CoD came to the same conclusion, as a new player is thrown in with level 70's and folks with mulitple prestiges.
The majority of people would rather just get into a game quickly.
CoD came to the same conclusion, as a new player is thrown in with level 70's and folks with mulitple prestiges.
The majority of people would rather just get into a game quickly.
#-9 Posted May 11 2012 - 18:35
-
- Players
- 10526 battles
-
1,708
-
Member since:
03-28-2011
Captain
no the majority of people would rather have better matches and wait a little more time. The reason this doesn't happen is the devs are running a business model centered around metered misery leading to players being encouraged to buy gold to reduce the pain. A smooth running MM would make this game enjoyable for all increasing profits by a large margin, but the devs are too stuck on their current business model to realize just how ass backwards it really is in a medium filled with so many choices.
#-8 Posted May 11 2012 - 19:47
-
- Players
- 20161 battles
-
3,770
-
Member since:
09-02-2011
Major
OP
You'll get overwhelming support to wait longer in MM.
And it will be ignored by WG.net.
You'll get overwhelming support to wait longer in MM.
And it will be ignored by WG.net.
