Jump to content


You Ask We Reply, May 25


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
224 replies to this topic

SuperJaws100 #61 Posted May 26 2012 - 23:30

    Captain

  • Players
  • 16753 battles
  • 1,290
  • Member since:
    06-07-2011

View Postc0r3, on May 26 2012 - 00:12, said:

Some players are stuck on the wrong server. I for example should be on the EU server but somehow downloaded and played the NA server without realising till it was too late. This makes end game (clan wars) unplayable due to timezone issues.

Will you allow users to switch to another server, and if so when?

You allow transfers to the SEA server but no others..

http://forum.worldof...d-your-support/


You think its bad for YOU? Most NA players cant do Clan Wars, 10:00 PM EST is too late. It needs to be earlier.

jerv #62 Posted May 26 2012 - 23:51

    Major

  • Players
  • 7697 battles
  • 5,409
  • [BURNS] BURNS
  • Member since:
    07-04-2011

Quote

Do you plan on changing the AMX 40? At the moment the tank has no benefits if compared to tanks of the same tier.  It could make a good showing in a junior tank company, but has no acess to it.

At the moment, we do not plan any changes.

I have to wonder why someone would think that. Maybe I just have too many Steel Walls in my AMX 40 to think it needs buffing :Smile_sceptic:

Quote


Is it possible to add an option in the settings to switch on the server reticle?

Yes, it’s possible, but we’re deciding whether to add it or not.  For now, just hold Caps and hit 0. Then turn off your caps!

In the meantime, that requires a mod

Zergling #63 Posted May 27 2012 - 01:31

    Major

  • Players
  • 16721 battles
  • 8,393
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    02-09-2011
Hell, did any question actually get properly answered at all in this YAWR?

I've read through it, and all I can see is a lot of 'no', 'maybe', 'undecided' and various other unsatisfactory replies.

c0r3 #64 Posted May 27 2012 - 03:00

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 14104 battles
  • 748
  • [NA2EU] NA2EU
  • Member since:
    05-26-2011

View PostSuperJaws100, on May 26 2012 - 23:30, said:

You think its bad for YOU? Most NA players cant do Clan Wars, 10:00 PM EST is too late. It needs to be earlier.

Erm, while I sympathise.... For me, and many others, it is between 2-5 AM!

http://forum.worldof...d-your-support/

Konigwolfen #65 Posted May 27 2012 - 13:29

    Captain

  • Players
  • 24830 battles
  • 1,290
  • [BFPA] BFPA
  • Member since:
    08-23-2011
Theyd be better off giving us a basic rundown of the next patch, like "We show, You ask, We reply" oh wait........

Darkflame #66 Posted May 27 2012 - 19:03

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 14717 battles
  • 768
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

View PostSuperJaws100, on May 26 2012 - 23:30, said:

You think its bad for YOU? Most NA players cant do Clan Wars, 10:00 PM EST is too late. It needs to be earlier.

While I see your point , your 10pm match is 4am for me...

Azasa #67 Posted May 27 2012 - 19:38

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 13665 battles
  • 10
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011

View PostBlitzkrieger, on May 26 2012 - 02:25, said:

I've asked before and never get a reply but will WG ever rework the su-5?

Allow me to take a stab at it based on the theme of the current YAWR:
"No changes for this tank are planned."

2PRO2CARE #68 Posted May 27 2012 - 19:41

    Sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 13939 battles
  • 159
  • Member since:
    07-12-2010
In Russia, we say No No No and No to your stupid American question.

DerJager #69 Posted May 27 2012 - 20:22

    Major

  • Players
  • 5593 battles
  • 2,357
  • [GGNKR] GGNKR
  • Member since:
    07-30-2011
In america, you question WG. In Soviet Russia, WG questions you!

But in all seriousness....


What is the current order of future additions? No time frame requested, but whats ahead of the 2nd German TD line on the update list?

RyanGetzIaf #70 Posted May 27 2012 - 20:29

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 24224 battles
  • 3,800
  • [TYR] TYR
  • Member since:
    09-15-2010

View PostDerJager, on May 27 2012 - 20:22, said:

What is the current order of future additions? No time frame requested, but whats ahead of the 2nd German TD line on the update list?

I'll answer you what WG will probably answer in only 6 month

''That is not something we're considering''

KCB_bird424 #71 Posted May 27 2012 - 22:36

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 17528 battles
  • 24
  • Member since:
    05-29-2011
My question is why 6 and 7 tier battles should be 3 or 4, is there not enough people playing to tighten up the tiers

Konigwolfen #72 Posted May 27 2012 - 23:23

    Captain

  • Players
  • 24830 battles
  • 1,290
  • [BFPA] BFPA
  • Member since:
    08-23-2011

View PostDerJager, on May 27 2012 - 20:22, said:

In america, you question WG. In Soviet Russia, WG questions you!

But in all seriousness....


What is the current order of future additions? No time frame requested, but whats ahead of the 2nd German TD line on the update list?

From what I could decipher from the WG ru blog, 7.4 will entail the french td line + premium french tanks/jgd88/is-6, and 7.5/7.6 the 2nd german td line, with the inclusion of the Brummbar premium Spg

HoldinJohnson #73 Posted May 28 2012 - 01:35

    Private

  • Players
  • 2000 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    12-24-2011
So basically everything we are begging the devs for, that could make this game better, the devs don't want to do. But to all of the things that no one really wants, they're happy to add and have devoted all of their time to do so.

Am I reading this right?

DerJager #74 Posted May 28 2012 - 02:21

    Major

  • Players
  • 5593 battles
  • 2,357
  • [GGNKR] GGNKR
  • Member since:
    07-30-2011
Yes, that would sum things up pretty accurately, Holdin.

thebeatles0100 #75 Posted May 28 2012 - 15:12

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 37057 battles
  • 144
  • [GOONZ] GOONZ
  • Member since:
    02-20-2011
Dear developers.
When will you bring back the U.S med tank T23.  Will you bring it back when there are tier 10 mediums? Because i miss that dam tank.

CaguamaMkII #76 Posted May 28 2012 - 16:06

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 47791 battles
  • 544
  • Member since:
    04-23-2011
Hi there, just wondering...
Just as each tank has its average experience per battle in the stats panel, would it be possible to add the average credit making for each tank??? :Smile_honoring:

CrazyCrave #77 Posted May 28 2012 - 16:10

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 20239 battles
  • 510
  • [-EV-] -EV-
  • Member since:
    10-10-2010
Do you plan to fix the crew member that tells you the tank is on fire as he seems a bit slow at it.. the tank pretty much has burn down by half before this crew member speaks about it which means spending the 3000 credits to put it out is kind of useless as the time it takes to hit the button means maybe 25% of the tank is left and adding another 3000 credits to the repair cost.

Edited by CrazyCrave, May 28 2012 - 16:12.


Section8_Sniper #78 Posted May 28 2012 - 16:27

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 43597 battles
  • 983
  • Member since:
    03-08-2012
Will the kv-4 be fixed in 7.4?

bmg50barrett #79 Posted May 28 2012 - 16:42

    Sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 6435 battles
  • 128
  • Member since:
    10-01-2010

View Posthammertime623, on May 26 2012 - 15:35, said:

I'm trying to figure out how many people actually care about the answers to half of the questions on this YAWR.  I don't feel like I'm any more informed about 7.4 than before reading this.  I'm still waiting for the German tree revision :Smile-hiding:

EXACTLY


Almost every single one of their "You Ask We Reply" posts is useless. We never get an idea of what they are doing, we only ever get told what they DONT do. Every question is like this:

*Q: Will you be adding this feature / tank / map / idea?

*A: No. / No, we have not considered this. / No, we do not ever plan on making this change.


It would be nice to see some POSITIVE answers in these things. Not just shutting down questions. It gives a very foul impression. All of the negative is very depressing to read through. Surely you have a Public Relations person who knows this?


And whats sad is that a lot of the questions are obviously popular questions. How about you pick some popular questions where you can say "YES! We have that thing planned for the winter." Or "YES! We have 3 things being worked on for this new thing."

That would be far more appealing to read through rather than, and I quote:

Not at this time.

No, we aren’t considering such an option.

It will be a powerful tank, but like every tank, it will have strengths and weaknesses.  You’ll have to wait for the release and judge for yourself what those are.

(This one makes me cry. Why did you waste the space even replying??? You gave us nothing useful in that answer.)

We’re not planning any sort of a bonus for this.

That is not something we’re considering.

No, we won’t do that. We tried and it didn’t prove to be effective.

Not this year.

No, we do not plan changes in these interfaces.

No, we rejected this mode long ago because it weakens the gameplay overall.

We don’t have a plan to do this at the moment, but if we decide to go that route, it won’t appear for quite a while

No, we don’t plan to add that at this time.

It will all be one pool.  We don’t have plans to separate them.

We plan it, but it’s not scheduled to happen in the immediate future.

It’s possible that we’ll add it in the future, but it's not scheduled.

No changes for this tank are planned.


These are just from one YAWR. Maybe for the next one you could include question you can answer proactively and positively?


SOURCE: YAWR May 25th

yarcod #80 Posted May 28 2012 - 17:00

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 17859 battles
  • 334
  • Member since:
    08-31-2011
"Do you plan to release the plans for the entire year?..."

"No, we don't do that.  We tried and it didn't prove to be effective."

This.  This is my #1 complaint with Wargaming.  A complete lack of communication about development.  We don't know the release date of a patch until a few days before it's applied!  It wasn't effective before because you didn't hit any of your deadlines and then failed to communicate what the new deadlines were.  This company fails to set any expectations and then wonders why people's expectations are too high.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users