Main page

If it can shoot like a Patton on the move, then I'll be willing to forgive any of the other  perceived deficiency's it has to the other factions tier 10's.

 coolmonkey26, on Jun 22 2012 - 22:33, said:

u mind if i use tht for my signature???

 razielkaine, on Jun 23 2012 - 21:16, said:

Oh baby, that's dirty right there.

lol i think i am making a big mistake pre-grinding for T-62A

I wouldnt care about the armor downgrade and lack of damage if it had better mobility than the Batchat & great on the move accuracy

 Riceygringo, on Jul 02 2012 - 17:07, said:

which will never happen, the top speed for T-62 is 50km/h~ L O L  I scense Russian bias

 Doppelgangerk, on Jul 02 2012 - 23:30, said:

Mobility does not always equal top speed, if it got something crazy like 30+ horsepower/ton with current T-54 style traverse it would overpower the Batchat in the mobility department..

Although I have to admit T-50-2 only has 32hp/ton with 46 degree traverse, if the T-62 gets that kind of power to weight ratio it will just be the new T-50-2 with lower top speed but even more trololol maneuverability.

 Drive_Me_Closer, on Jun 12 2012 - 03:30, said:

thats a T62 , not a T62A. T62A is a super T54/55.

i REALLY want a major boost in RoF and less aiming time and thats all i dont mind if it only does 320 currently my t-54 reload time is 6.88 so if they make it 6.15-6 that would be perfect

Honestly the only way I see that 100mm working is if it hits as hard damage wise as the Patton does now per shell, with the best on the move accuracy (aka meaning with 115% crew with full snap shot and smooth ride should have .38 accuracy) and .32 stationary.

Also the pen needs to be in the 199-252 range from 500-50m

This would not be hugely overpowering as the M48 and E50 will both out damage it per shell, have better gun depression, the M48 will have better armor overall, and the E50 will have great sniping ability as well as armor. The t-62a will have the best on the move accuracy, good armor, crap sight range like they always do aka Patton/E50 gonna rape it in that department, and it needs to have good acceleration since it doesn't have neutral steering the Patton should beat it in that department along with the Batchat.

http://forum.worldof...-were-revealed/

T-62A - 264(380 with gold) pen with 320 dmg firing @ 9.09 rounds a min

 Kallor, on Jul 10 2012 - 13:39, said:

2900 DPM on stock with 100% loader
which is 3100 DPM for vent/rammer 100% crews(116 for loader) loadout

 death666grim, on Jul 10 2012 - 15:28, said:

:le gasp: RUSSIA BIAS!!!!!!1111oneoneoneone

I want this tank.
Edited by ComradeHX, Jul 10 2012 - 16:32.

I am saving my silver and experience already.... bye bye T-54, Hello T-62A,
And yes, I am keeping my T-44, KV-13, & T-34...

 ColdWar82, on Jul 10 2012 - 16:46, said:

Your garage sounds similar to mine .

 death666grim, on Jul 10 2012 - 15:28, said:

Someone in there mentioned the 62A has 1050hp, around 30hp/ton. Even after they balance the new T10s, the 62A is going to be a crazy harrasment tank with it's fire-rate/armor/speed combo.

 TheWackyWombat, on Jul 10 2012 - 18:06, said:

Serb confirmed that the 1050 hp engine was a display bug, if it actually gets its historical 585 hp engine it would be extremely lame.
Edited by Riceygringo, Jul 10 2012 - 18:07.

 death666grim, on Jul 10 2012 - 15:28, said:

Still think they should up the base damage of the shell and slightly reduce the RoF and keep it at the same DPM, the 100mm just needs a bit more alpha like what they did for the long 88 and at least the long 88's shells didn't drastically increase in price like the D54 gun did over the D10T gun. 930 credits a shell is reasonable for its tier especially if we calculate the shell cost vs RoF of the other tier 10 meds.

 death666grim, on Jul 10 2012 - 15:28, said:

Quickest reload I got with rammer/vents/BIA (so no rations) is 5.45 seconds.  AKA 3523 DPM.  TROLOLOLOLOLOLOLO!