Jump to content


Skirmish VI


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
193 replies to this topic

SunFlash #41 Posted Jun 29 2012 - 03:53

    Major

  • Players
  • 22455 battles
  • 4,115
  • Member since:
    11-15-2011

View PostKPEMEHb, on Jun 29 2012 - 03:50, said:

We protest this this result. Please, replay this round with correct rules.

I hope for this, but knowing WG....

BonesIIX #42 Posted Jun 29 2012 - 03:58

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 18959 battles
  • 27
  • Member since:
    03-16-2011
We also protest the results. We expect to have the Skirmish Six tourney extended by one day to accommodate a replay of the round.

SilentDemise #43 Posted Jun 29 2012 - 04:01

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 56413 battles
  • 439
  • [-G-] -G-
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

View PostKPEMEHb, on Jun 29 2012 - 03:50, said:

We protest this this result. Please, replay this round with correct rules.

We won the match but I have to agree we must replay this round.

kufo #44 Posted Jun 29 2012 - 04:09

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 36565 battles
  • 836
  • [CAZA] CAZA
  • Member since:
    03-14-2011
Same situation River of Blood v6.0 vs  Cazadores. I demand a repetition of the encounter with the correct rules.

mdlsparky #45 Posted Jun 29 2012 - 04:20

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 8966 battles
  • 45
  • Member since:
    07-04-2011
it would be nice for the dev running this to be on to make sure everything works fine and goes fine just saying,,,

KPEMEHb #46 Posted Jun 29 2012 - 04:33

    Major

  • Players
  • 41598 battles
  • 2,051
  • [_UKR_] _UKR_
  • Member since:
    02-27-2011

View PostSilentDemise, on Jun 29 2012 - 04:01, said:

We won the match but I have to agree we must replay this round.

With all due respect, changing tanks, map, points, having a technical loss for the first battle because of the aforementioned points is a bit of a stretch to still consider this a valid result. I'll be the first to congratulate you if you win when we use correct tanks and map.

SilentDemise #47 Posted Jun 29 2012 - 05:54

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 56413 battles
  • 439
  • [-G-] -G-
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011
I was agreeing with you, sorry if that was not clear enough. I was saying that despite the fact my team got a win the round must be replayed with the proper map and settings.

KPEMEHb #48 Posted Jun 29 2012 - 06:00

    Major

  • Players
  • 41598 battles
  • 2,051
  • [_UKR_] _UKR_
  • Member since:
    02-27-2011

View PostSilentDemise, on Jun 29 2012 - 05:54, said:

I was agreeing with you, sorry if that was not clear enough. I was saying that despite the fact my team got a win the round must be replayed with the proper map and settings.

I understood, thanks, all I am saying is to be fair this should be replayed. I hope WG can arrange it and if not at least compensate the teams that lost, though really the skirmishes are not played for gold.

SunFlash #49 Posted Jun 29 2012 - 13:59

    Major

  • Players
  • 22455 battles
  • 4,115
  • Member since:
    11-15-2011
Well, it has been all night and nothing has happened.

Bro_Nobodycares #50 Posted Jun 29 2012 - 15:03

    Captain

  • Players
  • 28682 battles
  • 1,384
  • [5M0K3] 5M0K3
  • Member since:
    05-27-2011

View PostSunFlash, on Jun 29 2012 - 13:59, said:

Well, it has been all night and nothing has happened.

I'm going to email Lord_Farhad, the  e-sports community manager.  This is a screw up on WG and they need to correct it.

Migdev #51 Posted Jun 29 2012 - 15:15

    Private

  • Players
  • 13980 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    04-30-2011
I don't know if you noticed, but semifinals schedule already been posted...

mdlsparky #52 Posted Jun 29 2012 - 15:50

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 8966 battles
  • 45
  • Member since:
    07-04-2011
still nothing?

kufo #53 Posted Jun 29 2012 - 16:07

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 36565 battles
  • 836
  • [CAZA] CAZA
  • Member since:
    03-14-2011
There are two options.

1 reprogramming of the battles.

2 cancellation of the event.

SunFlash #54 Posted Jun 29 2012 - 16:09

    Major

  • Players
  • 22455 battles
  • 4,115
  • Member since:
    11-15-2011

View PostMigdev, on Jun 29 2012 - 15:15, said:

I don't know if you noticed, but semifinals schedule already been posted...

you think i didn't notice?

waterpolo_sniper #55 Posted Jun 29 2012 - 16:34

    Private

  • Players
  • 8985 battles
  • 6
  • Member since:
    10-15-2011
Are team, the 116th, beat ANVIL, however, we are protesting this VICTORY and would wish to face ANVIL again on the original terms. Don't believe us?
Posted Image

kufo #56 Posted Jun 29 2012 - 17:11

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 36565 battles
  • 836
  • [CAZA] CAZA
  • Member since:
    03-14-2011
I strongly disagree that teams that took advantage of the circumstances have any right to play the semifinal. Due to this, there rescheduling or cancellation of the event.

Bro_Nobodycares #57 Posted Jun 29 2012 - 17:22

    Captain

  • Players
  • 28682 battles
  • 1,384
  • [5M0K3] 5M0K3
  • Member since:
    05-27-2011
I've PMed lord_farquad, so hopefully will will see the official WG reaction to this issue.

Edited by CPLTrevoga, Jun 29 2012 - 17:23.


Katukov #58 Posted Jun 29 2012 - 17:39

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 72657 battles
  • 3,286
  • [WASHD] WASHD
  • Member since:
    11-27-2010
IMHO, cyber sports are important subject. WG should learn harder how to organize it well.

KPEMEHb #59 Posted Jun 29 2012 - 19:04

    Major

  • Players
  • 41598 battles
  • 2,051
  • [_UKR_] _UKR_
  • Member since:
    02-27-2011

View Postkufo, on Jun 29 2012 - 17:11, said:

I strongly disagree that teams that took advantage of the circumstances have any right to play the semifinal. Due to this, there rescheduling or cancellation of the event.

i would not accuse anyone of taking advantage, but this skirmish was about who has a better team of tier 5 mediums prepared to play on the airfield map, not who has a better setup of tier 3 tanks readily available and quickly figures out that you need no more than 19 points.

Though, with lack of response to this so far from WG, it does not look like they are taking any action to correct it. :Smile_confused:

Edited by KPEMEHb, Jun 29 2012 - 19:05.


killer__flu #60 Posted Jun 29 2012 - 21:47

    Corporal

  • Beta Testers
  • 20867 battles
  • 73
  • Member since:
    07-04-2010

View PostKPEMEHb, on Jun 29 2012 - 19:04, said:


Though, with lack of response to this so far from WG, it does not look like they are taking any action to correct it. :Smile_confused:

I can't believe they won't correct this problem in time. I certainly hope they do. (if they don't though I won't be to upset since we did adjust and won last night.) :arta:




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users