41 replies to this topic

[Ttylerrocks4u]

Omg thank you wargaming for fixing this map finally by moving the locations of where people start with the new modes i thank you.

Who else likes this??

lol being ninjaed...Read below for clarification im not saying malinovka was bad. Im asking for how you think the mode on this map and perhaps others are....

haha people still negging it... I think i understand now if a topic or post starts going south it will keep going apparently haha because people just see the red and as there 5 cents just negs it some more because its easier then saying ones opinion or misunderstanding what is said.

Let me clarify even more to people.

Malinovka is one of those maps for higher teir tanks that you either go through the fields in the middle or you have to go through the whole routined way of the hill. Arty is always a major player when they are present as they widdle the lemmings away who are in the open. This by no means is fun when you go the same route up and down the hill and then have to hide from arty. Arty i think are good and have there own reason im not against arty. I actually hope to own a batchat 155 one day. But as im sure people would agree with the switching around of where players start it has put a more funner twist on it rather then going this way or that you are actually facing each other now and go in a forward assualt not a flanking assualt.

Edited by Ttylerrocks4u, Jun 21 2012 - 02:23.

[AncalagonBlack]

Map was never broken. Bads just had issues with it.

[GenericSoldier]

This post has (insert slightly insulting word) written all over it. Also no body cares bout' your profile picture.

[Ttylerrocks4u]

AncalagonBlack, on Jun 21 2012 - 01:15, said:

Map was never broken. Bads just had issues with it.

no it wasnt broken i didnt say that dont put words in my mouth. All im saying is that the old malinovka map. It made you have to go up the hill or if you could cordinate with the team rush field. But now with the moving of where teams are now it makes it an actual map look to and play and actually use strategy on and have fun..

[_Hawkeye_]

I like the new I liked modes, and malinkovka before, so I am happy

[Emothic]

yea, but didn't they remove standard play from it to do that?

[xjnacho]

when you say fixing it implies broken

[Ttylerrocks4u]

also note im not one to suicide on this map other people do.....I just feel now its actually fun to play....

[Ttylerrocks4u]

xjnacho, on Jun 21 2012 - 01:49, said:

when you say fixing it implies broken

it was broken in terms of fun to play because you get people who would lemming themselves to the field

[Ttylerrocks4u]

GenericSoldier, on Jun 21 2012 - 01:22, said:

This post has (insert slightly insulting word) written all over it. Also no body cares bout' your profile picture.

how about fun.....

this post has fun written all over it lolz

[Rokurgepta]

AncalagonBlack, on Jun 21 2012 - 01:15, said:

Map was never broken. Bads just had issues with it.

Its a fun low level map. Higher tiers the gameplay is very predictable and static.

[Ttylerrocks4u]

Rokurgepta, on Jun 21 2012 - 02:04, said:

Its a fun low level map. Higher tiers the gameplay is very predictable and static.

thank you give this man an award lolz

[Rokurgepta]

Ttylerrocks4u, on Jun 21 2012 - 02:05, said:

thank you give this man an award lolz

Malinovka is the one map I can nearly promise you that the arty will blind fire as soon as they load after the game starts. This is because everyone who plays that map much knows where people will likely be X seconds into the game. I like Malinovka when i play low tier tanks. Higher tiers due to spotting its just not much fun.

Edited by Rokurgepta, Jun 21 2012 - 02:15.

[AncalagonBlack]

Rokurgepta, on Jun 21 2012 - 02:04, said:

Its a fun low level map. Higher tiers the gameplay is very predictable and static.

No. Like many maps, it has a variety of attacking lanes. What tends to happen though, is that Bads can't handle the tactical aspect of an attacking lane.

Which is why Bads have issues with it.

[Rokurgepta]

AncalagonBlack, on Jun 21 2012 - 02:10, said:

No. Like many maps, it has a variety of attacking lanes. What tends to happen though, is that Bads can't handle the tactical aspect of an attacking lane.

Which is why Bads have issues with it.

It is a fine map for you playing 100 matches in each tier 1. Yes in those tiers it has attacking lanes and tactics. Once you tier up you learn that because everyone has decent or better spotting distances the routes of attack become limited.

Please stop calling people bads and pretending you know. It makes you look silly and bad.

[Ttylerrocks4u]

Rokurgepta, on Jun 21 2012 - 02:08, said:

Malinovka is the one map I can nearly promise you that the arty will blind fire as soon as they load after the game starts. This is because everyone who plays that map much knows where people will likely be X seconds into the game. I like Malinovka when i play low tier tanks. Higher tiers due to spotting its just much fun.

Yeah...that an like i said before its a routined map no fun in a routine.

[AncalagonBlack]

Rokurgepta, on Jun 21 2012 - 02:13, said:

It is a fine map for you playing 100 matches in each tier 1. Yes in those tiers it has attacking lanes and tactics. Once you tier up you learn that because everyone has decent or better spotting distances the routes of attack become limited.

Please stop calling people bads and pretending you know. It makes you look silly and bad.

Also, 100 battles in my Hetzer (V-VIII mm weight), 71 battles in my Lowe (IX-XI mm weight), 86 battles in my Pz 38 nA (IV-IX mm weight). I could go on but you get the picture.

Please stop:

1. Assuming I'm calling specific people bad. You almost seem defensive.
2. Trying to invalidate what I'm saying by cherry picking my battles with certain tier tanks. Perhaps I'm taking my time through all tanks?

[Ttylerrocks4u]

There updated it more for you guys

[Rokurgepta]

AncalagonBlack, on Jun 21 2012 - 02:19, said:

Also, 100 battles in my Hetzer (V-VIII mm weight), 71 battles in my Lowe (IX-XI mm weight), 86 battles in my Pz 38 nA (IV-IX mm weight). I could go on but you get the picture.

Please stop:

1. Assuming I'm calling specific people bad. You almost seem defensive.
2. Trying to invalidate what I'm saying by cherry picking my battles with certain tier tanks. Perhaps I'm taking my time through all tanks?

Which is fine but when I tell you that Malinovka is not good in high tiers and you have nearly no games played at that level how about you consider I might be right? I said its no good in high tiers, that is not cherry picking that is pointing out you lack the experienc e at the tiers stated. Its truth. Your lack of games played at those level invalidates what you are saying.

Why would I be defensive? My stats in tanks similar to what you play is just as good if not better.

[AncalagonBlack]

Rokurgepta, on Jun 21 2012 - 02:23, said:

Which is fine but when I tell you that Malinovka is not good in high tiers and you have nearly no games played at that level how about you consider I might be right? I said its no good in high tiers, that is not cherry picking that is pointing out you lack the experienc e at the tiers stated. Its truth. Your lack of games played at those level invalidates what you are saying.

Why would I be defensive? My stats in tanks similar to what you play is just as good if not better.

I wonder what you mean by "at that level"? Many of the current tanks that I'm playing thru see anything from tier V to tier VIII, with a variety of roles to boot. I've seen Malinovka a fair amount while playing out those roles and, over a period of time, I've come to learn how to play those roles on this particular map.

So, if I need to play more heavy tanks "at that level", then I'm not going to consider anything you say from here on out worthy of my time. Only because, if you do have that opinion, any further discussion is pointless as the narrow minded are usually not worth the hassle of having a discussion with.

Didn't say you were defensive. Only that you seem defensive. See the difference?

Finally, my stats are both not all that important to me and skewed due to my goal of playing every tank at least 100 battles. Can't really output damage/exp at the same rate with a leichttraktor as with a Lowe, for example. :p