Jump to content


Developers and German bias

Tank trees Developers

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
109 replies to this topic

SimTim #101 Posted Sep 01 2012 - 18:37

    Captain

  • Players
  • 7232 battles
  • 1,653
  • Member since:
    07-08-2011

View PostDuty_Remains, on Sep 01 2012 - 09:20, said:

As long as its necromancy instead of necrophilia its OK.

That depends.

Slappy #102 Posted Sep 01 2012 - 22:50

    Corporal

  • Beta Testers
  • 3333 battles
  • 43
  • [AGT] AGT
  • Member since:
    07-15-2010
Now that 7.5 is safely out...lets look at how it turned out.  E-50M  Worst performing T10 Medium.  E-100 Buff was actually a nerf.  JP-100 is ok..but yes the New Russian TD is way better.  Did anyone really believe otherwise?

Agentice #103 Posted Sep 02 2012 - 01:16

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 16379 battles
  • 3,113
  • Member since:
    08-22-2010
I see the new russian TD as a steaming pile of refuse.

Fosh 155 and american TDs vastly superior.

WarStore #104 Posted Sep 02 2012 - 05:19

    Major

  • Players
  • 39528 battles
  • 13,516
  • Member since:
    01-31-2011

View PostAgentice, on Sep 02 2012 - 01:16, said:

I see the new russian TD as a steaming pile of refuse.

Fosh 155 and american TDs vastly superior.

You are the only one then

Arrowfoot #105 Posted Sep 02 2012 - 05:34

    Captain

  • Players
  • 36204 battles
  • 1,767
  • [1-63] 1-63
  • Member since:
    02-27-2012
you could have 10 heavy lines for the german and they still wont have a tier 5 or 6 heavy. Number of tanks does not mean better tanks, just more junk to have to grind throw. Besides with the T-62 the Russains are already into the 1960s (i dont care how they try to hide it, I was a US tanker in the 1980s and what was the biggest Russian Tank even then  the T-62) Right now the Germens are the only side whos tanks still all predate 1946, even if they do have a lot of them.

Lord__Sesshomaru #106 Posted Sep 02 2012 - 05:42

    Major

  • Players
  • 14191 battles
  • 6,688
  • Member since:
    06-02-2011

View PostArrowfoot, on Sep 02 2012 - 05:34, said:

you could have 10 heavy lines for the german and they still wont have a tier 5 or 6 heavy. Number of tanks does not mean better tanks, just more junk to have to grind throw. Besides with the T-62 the Russains are already into the 1960s (i dont care how they try to hide it, I was a US tanker in the 1980s and what was the biggest Russian Tank even then  the T-62) Right now the Germens are the only side whos tanks still all predate 1946, even if they do have a lot of them.

Thank you for serving our country.

Haides #107 Posted Sep 02 2012 - 15:32

    Major

  • Players
  • 9246 battles
  • 2,166
  • [IOC] IOC
  • Member since:
    08-14-2011

View PostArrowfoot, on Sep 02 2012 - 05:34, said:

you could have 10 heavy lines for the german and they still wont have a tier 5 or 6 heavy. Number of tanks does not mean better tanks, just more junk to have to grind throw. Besides with the T-62 the Russains are already into the 1960s (i dont care how they try to hide it, I was a US tanker in the 1980s and what was the biggest Russian Tank even then  the T-62) Right now the Germens are the only side whos tanks still all predate 1946, even if they do have a lot of them.
Having heavy tanks at tier 5 or 6 doesn't mean a nation's tech tree is better or not, nor are heavy tanks inherently better than mediums or lights.

streetluis #108 Posted Sep 03 2012 - 00:17

    Captain

  • Players
  • 23402 battles
  • 1,317
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011
WHEN WILL PEOPLE REALIZE

T-62 IS A COMPLETELY DifF TANK FROM T62A



bigeye123 #109 Posted Sep 03 2012 - 11:41

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 2004 battles
  • 486
  • Member since:
    08-03-2010
Alot of tanks that look cool and make people pay for premium to get them





Also tagged with Tank trees, Developers

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users