Jump to content


Developers and German bias

Tank trees Developers

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
109 replies to this topic

FaustianQ #61 Posted Jul 01 2012 - 05:47

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 18727 battles
  • 7,726
  • Member since:
    07-13-2010

View PostHeinen, on Jul 01 2012 - 05:23, said:

Keep the tears flowing buddy. It's sooooo damn important.

I dunno, you guys cry every time something new is introduced, I'd thought I come here and get advice from the experts. Maybe I too can get a gamebreaking tank added if a bitch enough about how bad I am in a tank and ignore how good it actually is.

View PostHeinen, on Jul 01 2012 - 05:24, said:

Some1 pass out pills 4 the whiners.

I'm surprised you guys didn't use them all up for yourselves, must have had a lot in stock.

Heinen #62 Posted Jul 01 2012 - 06:36

    Corporal

  • Beta Testers
  • 38010 battles
  • 95
  • Member since:
    01-27-2011

View PostFaustianQ, on Jul 01 2012 - 05:47, said:

I dunno, you guys cry every time something new is introduced, I'd thought I come here and get advice from the experts. Maybe I too can get a gamebreaking tank added if a bitch enough about how bad I am in a tank and ignore how good it actually is.



I'm surprised you guys didn't use them all up for yourselves, must have had a lot in stock.

sry...i never complained but keep the tears flowing. Some take this too seriously.


W/Regards,

Heinen

Duty_Remains: If that's the case... YOU'VE COMPLETELY MISSED THE POINT OF THIS TOPIC!!!

OK smart guy.

Edited by Heinen, Jul 01 2012 - 20:12.


Duty_Remains #63 Posted Jul 01 2012 - 13:43

    Major

  • Players
  • 17286 battles
  • 2,714
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostHeinen, on Jul 01 2012 - 06:36, said:

sry...i never complained but keep the tears flowing.


W/Regards,

Heinen

If that's the case...  YOU'VE COMPLETELY MISSED THE POINT OF THIS TOPIC!!!

Mow_Mow #64 Posted Jul 01 2012 - 17:00

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 12058 battles
  • 14,881
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    10-25-2010
EDIT: Never mind.

Edited by Mow_Mow, Jul 01 2012 - 17:00.


shdowhunt60 #65 Posted Jul 01 2012 - 17:21

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 11697 battles
  • 180
  • Member since:
    12-23-2011

View PostGermany317, on Jul 01 2012 - 01:15, said:

This is just plain and simply wrong. The American Forces during World War II had great respect for the German Army, not so much Hitler's elite SS Guard, but the basic branches such as Airforce, Infantry, Navy, etc. German tanks were by far better than most if not 90% of all Allied tanks, many German tank blueprints helped build a better road for Allied Armour after the war. On just a simple PzKpfw IV took over 1,096 manhours to produce just one tank! Germans in the 30's, 40's and still today still take great pride in their work on just about anything. To call the German Tech. Tree is an insault to All German tankers such as my self and other German tankers who might be reading this. Good day to you...Mow_Mow

And for all that effort, Germany never had enough tanks. You hear that it takes 5 shermans to kill one Panther. This is only half of the truth. To destroy that one Panther only came at the expense of only two Shermans, both of which were most likely to be restored, and there were hundreds of Shermans for every Panther. There is merit when the Soviets say that there is quality in quantity.

Hessachse #66 Posted Jul 01 2012 - 21:14

    Corporal

  • Beta Testers
  • 1992 battles
  • 42
  • [R4GE] R4GE
  • Member since:
    10-14-2010
Just wanna say, the M16 was a terrible assault rifle. :) Lots of GI's in Vietnam picked up AK's.

Killertomato #67 Posted Jul 01 2012 - 21:52

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 4500 battles
  • 773
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010

View PostWoltereck, on Jul 01 2012 - 21:14, said:

Just wanna say, the M16 was a terrible assault rifle. :) Lots of GI's in Vietnam picked up AK's.

And lots of them didn't. The M-16 works just fine if you clean it, and the AK isn't some perfect, self-cleaning wunderwaffe.

xthetenth #68 Posted Jul 01 2012 - 23:12

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 14690 battles
  • 3,529
  • [SEAMN] SEAMN
  • Member since:
    09-02-2010
I love how people with no reason to ever get in the way of anything other than silver rounds talk about the Maus being squishy. Oh no, the Maus has weaknesses that I can easily minimize if not eliminate entirely! This is so much worse than the Soviet tanks, which have weaknesses in every direction (HI MR. IS-4 DRIVER MAN!), the T110 which has an omnidirectional weakspot on top and side and rear armor like a tier seven or so german tank, or the 50B which has an omnidirectional weakspot called its turret and a ridiculous proclivity for getting its turret ring knocked out.

I think that makes the first argument that hasn't been paraphrased from a german tanker's whining and had the serial numbers filed off (including, no especially the date of creation argument). I wonder why this thread got made. If the grass really looks greener on the other trees, go there and realize that it's pretty much the same.

rinying #69 Posted Jul 01 2012 - 23:16

    Major

  • Players
  • 11427 battles
  • 5,746
  • Member since:
    04-07-2011

View PostXenomorphZZ, on Jun 29 2012 - 23:20, said:

oh oh oh and the AMX 30 is the FN FAL?
oddly enough, i love that gun in cod: world at war.... everyone else uses machine guns but i love using that semi auto rifle, somehow i do better with that thing than any other gun....

Duty_Remains #70 Posted Jul 01 2012 - 23:17

    Major

  • Players
  • 17286 battles
  • 2,714
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostHeinen, on Jul 01 2012 - 06:36, said:

sry...i never complained but keep the tears flowing. Some take this too seriously.


W/Regards,

Heinen

Duty_Remains: If that's the case... YOU'VE COMPLETELY MISSED THE POINT OF THIS TOPIC!!!

OK smart guy.

From a topic in another forum....

View PostMow_Mow, on Jun 29 2012 - 22:28, said:

Is this a good place to accuse the developers of German bias?

Germany: Two tier 10 TDs, two tier 10 heavies, two tier 10 mediums, one tier 8 artillery
USSR: One (or two) tier 10 TDs, two tier 10 heavies, one tier 10 medium, one tier 8 arty
France: One tier 10 TD, two tier 10 heavies, two tier 10 mediums, one tier 8 arty
USA: Two tier 10 TDs, one tier 10 heavy, one (or two potentially) tier 10 mediums, one tier 8 arty.


Germany has the most tanks, their beloved leopard 1 (god damnit), and their beloved E-100 TD with huge ass gun. I will almost bet money that they won't be satisfied and complain that they don't have enough tanks/their tanks aren't godly enough...

View PostMow_Mow, on Jun 29 2012 - 22:38, said:

I feel like making a topic in the general discussion board (or should I do it in the German heavy tank subforum?) of something like

"Official: Developers have German bias" and claim that the developers are biased towards German tanks because

1) They will have the most tanks
2) The Leopard 1 (1965) outdates the M48 by over 10 yearrs (1965vs.1951), and complain that the Americans are being left beind in cold war technology, and that they can't possibly keep up with these new tech that the Germans have, and therefore is completely UP and needs to be buffed. Any attempt to explain this year gap should be responded with "Developers + German bias" (exactly what all the german tanks are complaining about with the Maus)
3) Germany gets two TDs with the largest guns and most armor, and most firewpower. Therefore they must be OP


How many negative reps do you think I could farm with that one topic? (laugh)

Looks like its more about baiting the whining trolls infesting the German sub-forums...

So if you're not one of the whiner's this thread wasn't for you.

Edited by Duty_Remains, Jul 01 2012 - 23:18.


XenomorphZZ #71 Posted Jul 01 2012 - 23:27

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 12556 battles
  • 4,665
  • [RSRC] RSRC
  • Member since:
    01-24-2011
GOSH DARNIT, ABORT MISSION MOW_MOW, ABORT MISSION!

Duty_Remains #72 Posted Jul 01 2012 - 23:33

    Major

  • Players
  • 17286 battles
  • 2,714
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostXenomorphZZ, on Jul 01 2012 - 23:27, said:

GOSH DARNIT, ABORT MISSION MOW_MOW, ABORT MISSION!

Come on its more fun when they know they've been played!

amaROenuZ #73 Posted Jul 01 2012 - 23:41

    Major

  • Players
  • 16660 battles
  • 3,560
  • Member since:
    04-04-2012

View PostKillertomato, on Jul 01 2012 - 21:52, said:

And lots of them didn't. The M-16 works just fine if you clean it, and the AK isn't some perfect, self-cleaning wunderwaffe.

And lets not forget that a lot of the issues with the M-16 were simple toothing woes. The M16A2 is a fantastic weapon when handled properly.

Haides #74 Posted Jul 02 2012 - 10:25

    Major

  • Players
  • 9246 battles
  • 2,166
  • [IOC] IOC
  • Member since:
    08-14-2011
Well no, a lot of issues with the M16 is that it's, frankly, overpriced for what it is, and can be unreliable and prone to stoppages etc.

FaustianQ #75 Posted Jul 02 2012 - 11:20

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 18727 battles
  • 7,726
  • Member since:
    07-13-2010

View PostHaides, on Jul 02 2012 - 10:25, said:

Well no, a lot of issues with the M16 is that it's, frankly, overpriced for what it is, and can be unreliable and prone to stoppages etc.

Because the American civilian market has no idea of what guns are good? LOL. there is a reason why the AR15 has basically being cloned to death to the point that if a new weapons system hits the market it has to have compatibility with AR15 aftermarket accessories or it kind of flops, unless you're KeltTech, in which case your innovative phantom weapon is a roaring success.

ROMEU #76 Posted Jul 02 2012 - 12:46

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 10955 battles
  • 634
  • Member since:
    02-19-2011
This topic is only Troll food.

zorachus99 #77 Posted Jul 02 2012 - 15:51

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 30683 battles
  • 919
  • Member since:
    03-24-2011

View PostZergling, on Jun 30 2012 - 00:20, said:

You all know what the first tank to ever recieve a 3D model in WoT was?

Spoiler                     

It sure doesn't show they worked long with that idiotic Darth Vader helmet on top.

Just about every IV had a typical german turret, it was later they started up-armoring all the tanks after 41' or so.

Doesn't matter though... stupid & ugly is final.

lostwingman #78 Posted Jul 02 2012 - 17:11

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 22777 battles
  • 24,283
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    01-11-2011

View PostHeinen, on Jul 01 2012 - 05:24, said:

Some1 pass out pills 4 the whiners.
Your talking about German tankers right?
You must be, biggest group of whiners on the entire forum. Truly an undisputed fact.

lostwingman #79 Posted Jul 02 2012 - 17:13

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 22777 battles
  • 24,283
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    01-11-2011

View Postzorachus99, on Jul 02 2012 - 15:51, said:

It sure doesn't show they worked long with that idiotic Darth Vader helmet on top.

Just about every IV had a typical german turret, it was later they started up-armoring all the tanks after 41' or so.

Doesn't matter though... stupid & ugly is final.
Ok then. From here on out you can only play the Panzer IV with the stock turret and only up to the 75L48.
Then we'll see how quickly you beg to have a better gun.

Damn idiots, always spewing garbage without thinking any of the consequences through.

bigeye123 #80 Posted Jul 03 2012 - 09:39

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 2004 battles
  • 486
  • Member since:
    08-03-2010

View PostKillertomato, on Jul 01 2012 - 21:52, said:

And lots of them didn't. The M-16 works just fine if you clean it, and the AK isn't some perfect, self-cleaning wunderwaffe.
In the US army there was some rule saying you have to clean your M16 3 times a day. You can leave the AK47 freezing out in the mud and it will still fire.

Back on topic, I feel that even though the Germans might have alot of tanks, they might not be good. This is probably some grand scheme by Wargaming to make as much money as possible by adding more tanks which makes people buy more premium/gold rounds/premium tanks to progress faster.





Also tagged with Tank trees, Developers

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users