Jump to content


T62A underpowered...


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
16 replies to this topic

Poll: T62A (56 members have cast votes)

Needs a buff?

  1. YES (32 votes [57.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 57.14%

  2. NO (24 votes [42.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 42.86%

Vote Hide poll

borris #1 Posted Jul 14 2012 - 08:52

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 9780 battles
  • 102
  • Member since:
    01-28-2011
In the 7.5 test the T62A is severly undowerpowered, it must be buffed. With the horrible engine it is not a medium that can circle an enemy instead the heavies turret can keep up, therefore it is a nerfed heavy. Therefore I strongly suggest that t54 is moved to t10 and recieved more hitpoints and the t62A's gun with stats and move the t62a to t9. Or atleast give the T62A the T54s top engine.

nicodeimous #2 Posted Jul 14 2012 - 08:57

    Captain

  • Players
  • 17629 battles
  • 1,678
  • [7-BDR] 7-BDR
  • Member since:
    06-22-2011
Just as long as a centurion can wipe the floor with it, its all good.  1200 Syrian T54 /T62 vs 300 Centurions and the winner was ... the centurion hands down.

Doppelgangerk #3 Posted Jul 14 2012 - 19:52

    Sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 11276 battles
  • 192
  • Member since:
    07-16-2010
LOL 4 hater spotted

INKRO #4 Posted Jul 14 2012 - 20:04

    Captain

  • Beta Testers
  • 9781 battles
  • 1,051
  • [RD] RD
  • Member since:
    07-27-2010
It's not even out yet you know.

DerJager #5 Posted Jul 14 2012 - 20:22

    Major

  • Players
  • 2587 battles
  • 2,231
  • Member since:
    07-30-2011
LOL!!!! Wow you are stupid.


If the T-62 gets a buff, then I demand a buff for the E-50M.

Anakarsis #6 Posted Jul 14 2012 - 20:43

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 12835 battles
  • 267
  • Member since:
    10-15-2011
How can T-62 armor be less than the one on T-54? this is historically supported or its the idea of some genius?

rags17 #7 Posted Jul 15 2012 - 00:06

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 11984 battles
  • 883
  • Member since:
    03-17-2012

View Postnicodeimous, on Jul 14 2012 - 08:57, said:

Just as long as a centurion can wipe the floor with it, its all good.  1200 Syrian T54 /T62 vs 300 Centurions and the winner was ... the centurion hands down.

Of course all the Syrian tankers were at 50% whereas the Israelis were all 100% and working on their third skills . . .

(Actually - THAT'S the sort of batle that I'd love to see - 30 tanks all same tier - 20 with 45-46% rated players, 10 with 55% plus rated players.  I'd happily play either side !)

sephrus #8 Posted Jul 15 2012 - 19:39

    Captain

  • Players
  • 24307 battles
  • 1,431
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011
Have you played the t62a yet. Only going uphill is the t54 faster. And on soft and med ground the t62 is faster. And the RSG makes the t62a equal uphill.

ThrustHead #9 Posted Jul 16 2012 - 07:16

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 5777 battles
  • 192
  • [TAG] TAG
  • Member since:
    07-15-2011
the T-62A has avery bad armor it needs to be sloped or something

blade12444 #10 Posted Jul 16 2012 - 10:18

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 7691 battles
  • 563
  • Member since:
    09-23-2010
if u have something to say about the tank TALK ABOUT IT IN THE TEST DISCUSSIONS.... some people are just....

Nozander #11 Posted Jul 16 2012 - 10:41

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 10866 battles
  • 221
  • Member since:
    02-03-2011
there are many threads about it on public test add more to it . its where DEVs read , they never read suggestions  at least from this forum.

wardogz12 #12 Posted Jul 16 2012 - 10:42

    Captain

  • Players
  • 19185 battles
  • 1,091
  • Member since:
    02-23-2011
:arta:

COMMANDER282 #13 Posted Aug 05 2012 - 04:20

    Private

  • Players
  • 6921 battles
  • 8
  • Member since:
    07-01-2011
I strongly beileve that the t62A needs a buff armour wise because the t54 hull armour historically was the same as the type 59s (100mm frontally) and the t54 armour was buffed so that it would be acceptable at teir 9 (buffed to 120mm frontally). I hope that they do he same thing for the t62A......fingers crossed. :Smile_blinky:

ViktorTsoi #14 Posted Aug 05 2012 - 04:36

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 9189 battles
  • 253
  • Member since:
    02-08-2012

View Postnicodeimous, on Jul 14 2012 - 08:57, said:

Just as long as a centurion can wipe the floor with it, its all good.  1200 Syrian T54 /T62 vs 300 Centurions and the winner was ... the centurion hands down.

WHOAAAA BUDDYY !!! Learn your history first .... The Israelis used the Sho't a modification of the Centurion with more armor and better gun stabilizers. Secondly the Sho'ts were able to snipe from long ranges from higher ground.Third the Israelis are incredible Tankers they also have a very professional all-time army and awesome dedication to fight , and lets be honest the Syrians are shit they don't know how to win a war even if you gave them the whole world nuclear arsenal , so yes the Centurion is good but we cant be sure if its better , i want to see 100 T-62s crewed by Russians V.S. 100 Centurions crewed by British then we would see whos best

DerJager #15 Posted Aug 05 2012 - 06:40

    Major

  • Players
  • 2587 battles
  • 2,231
  • Member since:
    07-30-2011

View PostCOMMANDER282, on Aug 05 2012 - 04:20, said:

I strongly beileve that the t62A needs a buff armour wise because the t54 hull armour historically was the same as the type 59s (100mm frontally) and the t54 armour was buffed so that it would be acceptable at teir 9 (buffed to 120mm frontally). I hope that they do he same thing for the t62A......fingers crossed. :Smile_blinky:

If you get a direct buff like armor increase, you'll have to take an indirect buff in something else, like ROF, or aim time, or your ammo rack or something.

I don't think they've ever given a direct buff like that, save possibly increasing the E-100 and Mause's HP's. But those were both unique cases, as they are unique among heavy tanks, and have found themselves without a role, and generally being a bit useless.

nicodeimous #16 Posted Aug 06 2012 - 17:23

    Captain

  • Players
  • 17629 battles
  • 1,678
  • [7-BDR] 7-BDR
  • Member since:
    06-22-2011

View PostViktorTsoi, on Aug 05 2012 - 04:36, said:

WHOAAAA BUDDYY !!! Learn your history first .... The Israelis used the Sho't a modification of the Centurion with more armor and better gun stabilizers. Secondly the Sho'ts were able to snipe from long ranges from higher ground.Third the Israelis are incredible Tankers they also have a very professional all-time army and awesome dedication to fight , and lets be honest the Syrians are shit they don't know how to win a war even if you gave them the whole world nuclear arsenal , so yes the Centurion is good but we cant be sure if its better , i want to see 100 T-62s crewed by Russians V.S. 100 Centurions crewed by British then we would see whos best

Again it would be the centurions, the tank was out right better.  62's while in theory were good tanks the cramped design and poorly manufactured components made for a sub par end product [which has plagued soviet designs all through the cold war era].  Agreed they are incredible tankers, which is why during the dusk and night part of the offensive the centurions did well enough [they didn't have IR like the T-62's did].

ARGENTVS #17 Posted Aug 06 2012 - 19:10

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 26384 battles
  • 775
  • [ACA] ACA
  • Member since:
    04-17-2011
If you buff the tier X meds the game will be unplayable. It will directly replace the heavys and play with the tier 9 will be a punishment for players. The T62 already is OP firing every 5 seconds and bounce more than the M48 wich can be pen with autoaim with tier 7 tanks.
Accept tanks must be diferent and have weaknesses and strengths, if you start to buff everything you dont like you end with a game where all the tanks are the same, losing a lot of fun and erasing the diferent ways of use for each one.

And, Russian tree has the most OP tanks in the game all the time, when you have one wich do a little less damage you cant ask make it OP as the others. Use the tank, learn to exploit it strengths and hide its weaknesses.

Edited by ARGENTVS, Aug 06 2012 - 19:11.