lord_farquad, on Sep 20 2012 - 16:44, said:
I won't say to much other than what GD said... he and I both discussed it at length and agree that we will not be using the same set of rules to determine tiebreakers. I also spent quite some time yesterday creating our own set.... in the NA you can expect to see something more along the lines of a straight win/loss comparison (no teams being moved from the equation), then head to head, then a head to head against any team who has already qualified, and finally, if tied in those, then a rematch.
Those are still a work in progress, but we obviously want it to be much more clear, and made known to the players prior to the event, not during.
...ok so I did say more than GD said
Those are still a work in progress, but we obviously want it to be much more clear, and made known to the players prior to the event, not during.
...ok so I did say more than GD said

Well that's good news.
Somewhat-related question: Do you have any clue/are you willing to tell us if your events will be co-run by another entity (like ural steel and russian esports federation)?