Plane on Murovanka
Tsupernami
Aug 17 2012
Now I will admit, it is my fault that I keep hitting it with my 2801, thus causing me to stop and be ruined in seconds. However why can it not be run down? All the planes on Airfield can? If there is a legitimate reason, like to stop people like me running around and scouting the forest, however can you replace it with a rock or something similar? A plane should not be able to withstand a full speed 2801.
Spanisharmada
Aug 17 2012
I think its because the plane that crashede down is a Stuka and is heavier than the VK2801 the Planes in airfield are Fighters which are lighter than tanks and bombers but they do have agility.
So Murovanka planes = Heavier than tank
Airfiel PLanes: Lighter than tanks
So Murovanka planes = Heavier than tank
Airfiel PLanes: Lighter than tanks
Dockmaster
Aug 17 2012
These planes are part of the map that is indestructable. They are just eye candy like the knocked out tank at campanova and cannot be moved.
iomegaman
Aug 17 2012
I hit that plane in my T-50 the other day and came to a full stop. I don't remember ever seeing it before then.
Tsupernami
Aug 18 2012
Ah so it wasn't just me who thinks it's new.
Anyway my point is, a plane should be destructable, so why have they not replaced it with a rock?
Anyway my point is, a plane should be destructable, so why have they not replaced it with a rock?
Engine_95
Aug 18 2012
I understand your point of a rock's damage immunity vs. an aircraft's when confronted with several tons of AFV at speed but isn't there a more simple solution here? You know where the plane is every time the map loads. It's not going to move. Drive around it.
E-95
E-95
Tsupernami
Aug 18 2012
Engine_95, on Aug 18 2012 - 01:30, said:
I understand your point of a rock's damage immunity vs. an aircraft's when confronted with several tons of AFV at speed but isn't there a more simple solution here? You know where the plane is every time the map loads. It's not going to move. Drive around it.
E-95
E-95
Billymays
Aug 18 2012
Tsupernami, on Aug 18 2012 - 01:20, said:
Ah so it wasn't just me who thinks it's new.
Anyway my point is, a plane should be destructable, so why have they not replaced it with a rock?
Anyway my point is, a plane should be destructable, so why have they not replaced it with a rock?
http://i.qkme.me/4dg0.jpg
Sorry i couldn't resist x3
Engine_95
Aug 19 2012
Tsupernami, on Aug 18 2012 - 20:14, said:
We know this. That wasn't the point. I admitted it was my own folly to have hit the darn thing. However it was merely a suggestion to make the map more realistic. If you want an indestructible object in that field, a rock or thick wall/house, or windmill would see more appropriate.
Maybe the plane crashed on a rock.
E-95
Tsupernami
Aug 20 2012
Well at least the two of you made this topic slightly more humourous :-P


