Jump to content


T-50


  • Please log in to reply
44 replies to this topic

The_Chieftain #1 Posted Aug 22 2012 - 18:39

    Military Specialist

  • Administrator
  • 19356 battles
  • 10,015
  • [WGA] WGA
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011

Posted Image


Come on likes for my Facebook page! (Trying to get to a thousand as a first stop)

I’m one of those people who hates in-game T-50-2s with a passion, mainly because I don’t own one. There is little more satisfying that nailing the buggers with an 8” round as they zip around at high speed, and with the current special on T-50s, there are a few of those out there.  But where did these things come from to begin with?

Spoiler                     


Tiger_23 #2 Posted Aug 22 2012 - 19:00

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 11894 battles
  • 10,229
  • Member since:
    07-27-2010
Finnish T-50 :3

also. great article! :D

tankcrunch #3 Posted Aug 22 2012 - 19:03

    Major

  • Players
  • 25346 battles
  • 8,598
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011
nice

Lisped #4 Posted Aug 22 2012 - 19:13

    Captain

  • Players
  • 9894 battles
  • 1,567
  • [FURHQ] FURHQ
  • Member since:
    02-20-2011
And they said the T-50-2 never existed. even before this, i proved them wrong. Brohoof to you, Chief!

Chicada #5 Posted Aug 22 2012 - 19:14

    Major

  • Players
  • 22278 battles
  • 3,066
  • [HIME] HIME
  • Member since:
    02-26-2011
I find them actually quite easy to hit, especiall the t-50-2's. Well, in my type i can pull of AMAZING moving snipe shots because of the gear i put on.

The_Chieftain #6 Posted Aug 22 2012 - 19:24

    Military Specialist

  • Administrator
  • 19356 battles
  • 10,015
  • [WGA] WGA
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011

View PostLisped, on Aug 22 2012 - 19:13, said:

And they said the T-50-2 never existed. even before this, i proved them wrong. Brohoof to you, Chief!

Who is "they"?

http://images3.wikia.../89/Brohoof.jpg

Phredde #7 Posted Aug 22 2012 - 19:28

    Corporal

  • Beta Testers
  • 17094 battles
  • 16
  • Member since:
    07-04-2010
I love playing my 50-2 but totally hate trying to hit the darn things when I'm not.  I don't play it often but invariably it's the one I play whenever I hear "I have time for one more game..." on platoon chat.

Maus123 #8 Posted Aug 22 2012 - 19:31

    Major

  • Players
  • 3446 battles
  • 2,483
  • Member since:
    02-01-2012
I love how the game treats these slow infantry tanks as fast motorcycles.

Edited by Maus123, Aug 22 2012 - 19:31.


The_Chieftain #9 Posted Aug 22 2012 - 19:37

    Military Specialist

  • Administrator
  • 19356 battles
  • 10,015
  • [WGA] WGA
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011
Just because the British said that infantry support tanks had to be slow doesn't mean that other nations had to share the same philosophy.

_J_D_ #10 Posted Aug 22 2012 - 19:52

    Captain

  • Players
  • 102028 battles
  • 1,335
  • Member since:
    05-05-2011
I wonder how fast its acceleration and speed.

The_Chieftain #11 Posted Aug 22 2012 - 20:04

    Military Specialist

  • Administrator
  • 19356 battles
  • 10,015
  • [WGA] WGA
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011
Pretty good. hp/weight was 21.4 hp/ton and about 52km/h.

Lisped #12 Posted Aug 22 2012 - 20:09

    Captain

  • Players
  • 9894 battles
  • 1,567
  • [FURHQ] FURHQ
  • Member since:
    02-20-2011

View PostThe_Chieftain, on Aug 22 2012 - 19:24, said:


They as in, "Everybody who ever thought about the T-50-2 thought it was fictional". i always proved them wrong by posting the prototype picture of the T-50-2.

CdtWeasel #13 Posted Aug 22 2012 - 20:16

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 13327 battles
  • 798
  • [ARBOK] ARBOK
  • Member since:
    05-17-2011
You need to own a -2 chief. They are 2x the fun of the vanilla fifty.

StrohsVonPabst #14 Posted Aug 22 2012 - 20:31

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 6834 battles
  • 202
  • Member since:
    08-20-2011

View PostLisped, on Aug 22 2012 - 19:13, said:

And they said the T-50-2 never existed. even before this, i proved them wrong. Brohoof to you, Chief!
Technicality,just one dopes opinion but prototypes should have no place in the game.Oh yea,I dig what your signature has to say.

the_moidart #15 Posted Aug 22 2012 - 21:05

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 30587 battles
  • 2,155
  • Member since:
    10-22-2010
So the T-127 is a T-50 prototype eh? No wonder its MM has been nerfed.

anonym_arBJVOU7XWDP #16 Posted Aug 22 2012 - 21:08

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 0 battles
  • 541
  • Member since:
    06-01-2020
Now all we need is FPSRussia driving to the nearest Whitecastle in a T-50..............

tazman605 #17 Posted Aug 22 2012 - 21:09

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 7116 battles
  • 15
  • Member since:
    12-12-2011

View PostStrohsVonPabst, on Aug 22 2012 - 20:31, said:

Technicality,just one dopes opinion but prototypes should have no place in the game.Oh yea,I dig what your signature has to say.
That would be so boring if there were no prototypes like the T-50 and T-50-2. The game would be so limited and again BORING! Can't wait til they come out with the British tanks and hopefully one day the Japanese prototype tanks.

The_Chieftain #18 Posted Aug 22 2012 - 21:18

    Military Specialist

  • Administrator
  • 19356 battles
  • 10,015
  • [WGA] WGA
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011

View Postthe_moidart, on Aug 22 2012 - 21:05, said:

So the T-127 is a T-50 prototype eh?

Technically, no, but it is effectively born of the same program.

Dominatus #19 Posted Aug 22 2012 - 21:24

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 10311 battles
  • 13,790
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    12-21-2010
I the only person who thinks Object 211 is a better name than T-50-2?

Vladimir__Poutine #20 Posted Aug 22 2012 - 21:39

    Major

  • Players
  • 14223 battles
  • 4,325
  • Member since:
    12-04-2011
+1




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users