Jump to content


Petition against the new Chinese copy tanks


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
635 replies to this topic

Sturm_Teufel #81 Posted Nov 08 2012 - 20:21

    Captain

  • Players
  • 22228 battles
  • 1,687
  • [DTG] DTG
  • Member since:
    07-22-2011

therowman, on Nov 08 2012 - 18:24, said:

The types are unique. They have different guns, different turrets.

Should we axe the BT series and the T-34.


They are modified off of the American Christie tanks.

http://www.peachmoun...PG_121_2008.jpg


Should we Axe the Hetzer, it is built off of the 38t which isn't german.

Maybe the ms-1, which was created off of the Renault.
NOOOOOOOOO! Have mercy! Not my Hetzer! I'll do anything! Pleeeeeeease! :Smile_trollface-3:
Also, if the Chinese server got their tanks and the NA server did not, there would be lots of gripe/bitch/moan/whine/complaints and BIAS!BIAS!BIAS!BIAS!
But hey! We're still getting some new U.S. tanks at least.
Speaking of Hetzers, I should buy mine again and play it. :Smile_trollface-3:

Edited by Sturm_Teufel, Nov 08 2012 - 20:24.


kisieltj #82 Posted Nov 08 2012 - 20:54

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 12529 battles
  • 506
  • [10SBP] 10SBP
  • Member since:
    01-24-2011
Petition? Really? I wish we had a NA version of SerB to give some players  ROs for stupitidity.

spongebobpanzerpants #83 Posted Nov 08 2012 - 20:57

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 4711 battles
  • 49
  • Member since:
    03-26-2012
REMOVED

General insults (minor). Warning issued.
~SgtGrunt

Edited by SgtGrunt, Nov 09 2012 - 01:17.


iomegaman #84 Posted Nov 08 2012 - 20:57

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 14732 battles
  • 817
  • Member since:
    03-25-2012
http://img854.images.../4721/yaogr.jpg

cv5yorktown #85 Posted Nov 08 2012 - 21:12

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 3458 battles
  • 281
  • [502ND] 502ND
  • Member since:
    08-14-2011
Would I rather have seen something else added instead of the Chinese tree? Yes

Would it be smart to add Chinese tanks to attract more players on the Asian server. Yes

We (NA server) may have wanted something else, but that doesn't mean WG can ignore what the other servers want.

Ericridge #86 Posted Nov 08 2012 - 21:31

    Major

  • Players
  • 13978 battles
  • 2,246
  • [BFPA] BFPA
  • Member since:
    09-15-2012

Zedzded, on Nov 08 2012 - 19:19, said:

Some of our resident racists have no clue about American history. We were built on copyright & patent infringement.

Don't forget that most of our railroad in the west (the toughest part) was built by the Chinese as well.

Its also funny to watch the same things that built their empire through copyright / patent infringements only for it to come a full circle and start suing people for copyright and patent infringements.

AdeptusArkainis #87 Posted Nov 08 2012 - 21:36

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 25387 battles
  • 2,153
  • [VILIN] VILIN
  • Member since:
    12-20-2010
When WG asked us what we thought about a Chinese tech tree I agreed we should totally have one, it'd be kinda cool. Little did I know it would come in patch 8.2, I was really hoping for other tech tree expansions, not another new nation so soon.

Beerstein #88 Posted Nov 08 2012 - 21:38

    Major

  • Players
  • 16347 battles
  • 10,436
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    08-18-2011
They can make up all they want long as they aren't as the OP said duplicate tanks, that'd bother me.

KariLP #89 Posted Nov 08 2012 - 21:41

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 5810 battles
  • 889
  • Member since:
    07-12-2011

KarateF22, on Nov 08 2012 - 16:18, said:

At least its true to life. China designs are typically unimaginative rip-offs of existing things....


godofdun #90 Posted Nov 08 2012 - 21:50

    Major

  • Players
  • 8448 battles
  • 4,239
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    07-09-2011
Vote here! http://forum.worldof...tech-tree-poll/

Blackshark2000 #91 Posted Nov 08 2012 - 21:52

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 7234 battles
  • 92
  • Member since:
    06-06-2011

Saga, on Nov 08 2012 - 16:19, said:

Don't play them if they bother you that much.

You see that man pointing that rifle at your face? Just don't look at him if he bothers you that much.

General_Hospital #92 Posted Nov 08 2012 - 22:02

    Sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 10940 battles
  • 217
  • Member since:
    08-05-2010

Blackshark2000, on Nov 08 2012 - 21:52, said:

You see that man pointing that rifle at your face? Just don't look at him if he bothers you that much.

Learn to analogy.

Lil_Brat #93 Posted Nov 08 2012 - 22:12

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 9325 battles
  • 88
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011
OHHH the horror a FOR PROFIT company trying make money!!!!!.

News Flash..... WG is a FOR PROFIT company. To stay competitive, it needs to expand its base so it can MAKE MORE $$$ to pay for its employees and keep the game F2P.

It's a very simple concept.

Edited by Lil_Brat, Nov 08 2012 - 22:13.


Halsinki #94 Posted Nov 08 2012 - 22:33

    Captain

  • Players
  • 12571 battles
  • 1,637
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

EJVH3, on Nov 08 2012 - 16:44, said:

Keep that garbage in the Chinese and asia market...don't bring it to the NA server.

It's no more garbage than all of the blueprint tanks that are already in the game. So let's agree that we have differing opinions... as long as you realize that your's is stupid.

Yuffy #95 Posted Nov 08 2012 - 22:38

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 9579 battles
  • 860
  • Member since:
    09-12-2012

ColdWar82, on Nov 08 2012 - 16:21, said:

Wake up, we no longer live in a Euro-centric world (which includes the America's).....

If the young capitolists from the former Soviet Union choose to market to another part of the world, great.
This is capitolism!  You make your money by providing goods and services to those who will pay for them.
This is what made Euro-centrism possible in the first place.... and now it is available to a post communistic world.
Um... no. And it's capitalism.

GeneralDirection #96 Posted Nov 08 2012 - 22:43

    Major

  • Administrator
  • 5829 battles
  • 3,011
  • [WGA-A] WGA-A
  • Member since:
    08-22-2011

Nacht_Jager, on Nov 08 2012 - 16:13, said:

I was very shocked to see the new 8.2 patch notes, I had thought that the issue of there not being enough Chinese tank designs to fill a tech tree had pretty much put the issue to bed. However, we are now going to be getting a new tree full of designs taken from other nations and labeled as Chinese.

I personally see this as a blatant money making move. Wargaming simply want to appeal to the vast Chinese market by giving them a tree of their own. Never mind that it means using about 10 designs already in-game in other trees. I personally think that the Chinese tree is unimaginative and uninteresting. Also, the tier 10 is probably an improved variant of the WZ-111, a rip off of the IS-3. Great, an up-gunned IS-3 as a tier 10. This just gets better and better.

Please support this thread if you, like me would rather see some more genuine and original content. I mean its not like there's a shortage of designs out there that still have yet to be implemented. When they have brought in the British TD's and SPG's, Japanese, Italians, European tree, and possibly Commonwealth trees, then by all means fabricate a Chinese tree.

EDIT: I am seeing a lot of 'If you don't like it, don't play it arguments, and to be quite honest with you, I'm 99% sure that I wont be playing the new tanks. However my issue is with the order of the updates. This would appear to be really scraping the bottom of the ideas barrel. There are loads of great tank designs that could be implemented; why resort to Chinese copy-tanks?

Also, I find it kind of ironic how that was about the best trailer for WOT I have seen  :Smile_blinky:

So you'd rather the tech tree only be released on the Chinese cluster? Because that's the alternative... I suppose we could just release the new American branch.

Dukaan #97 Posted Nov 08 2012 - 22:52

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 16559 battles
  • 900
  • [SHOJO] SHOJO
  • Member since:
    09-11-2011
What is this? Some SOPA/PIPA like petition on a game of internet tanks?

I've seen stranger.

Painbringer71 #98 Posted Nov 08 2012 - 22:55

    Major

  • Players
  • 21567 battles
  • 4,411
  • [DHO3] DHO3
  • Member since:
    05-22-2012
Could go pacific rim ?  Japanese Chinese Korean

Just a thought

Have no issue with what you guys are doing

Corperations build tanks not the military and its a free trade world  :Smile_trollface-3:

Edited by Painbringer71, Nov 08 2012 - 22:59.


Cl4nkCl4nk #99 Posted Nov 08 2012 - 22:57

    Captain

  • Players
  • 23209 battles
  • 1,349
  • [XERO] XERO
  • Member since:
    05-07-2011

GeneralDirection, on Nov 08 2012 - 22:43, said:

So you'd rather the tech tree only be released on the Chinese cluster? Because that's the alternative... I suppose we could just release the new American branch.

I hope you don't let the complaints deter you.  IMO, the plans for 8.2 are just fine.

godofdun #100 Posted Nov 08 2012 - 22:59

    Major

  • Players
  • 8448 battles
  • 4,239
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    07-09-2011

GeneralDirection, on Nov 08 2012 - 22:43, said:

So you'd rather the tech tree only be released on the Chinese cluster? Because that's the alternative... I suppose we could just release the new American branch.

Yes.




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users