Jump to content


www.NoobMeter.com - WoT performance rating (player comparison tool)

performance efficiency rating comparison tool noobmeter www.noobmeter.com

  • Please log in to reply
1889 replies to this topic

Praetor77 #1481 Posted Feb 26 2013 - 21:55

    Captain

  • Players
  • 29716 battles
  • 1,695
  • [BADGR] BADGR
  • Member since:
    05-01-2011
For WN it´s the avg tier of tank played. Noobmeter adjusts your average tier for some tanks, like artillery.

bristolscale7 #1482 Posted Feb 27 2013 - 09:54

    Corporal

  • Beta Testers
  • 14869 battles
  • 51
  • [WWPD] WWPD
  • Member since:
    10-25-2010

View PostPraetor77, on Feb 26 2013 - 21:55, said:

For WN it´s the avg tier of tank played. Noobmeter adjusts your average tier for some tanks, like artillery.

Would you consider adjusting the average tier for terminal tier 5 scouts?  The average tier my Chaffee sees is probably between 7 and 8.

Folterknecht #1483 Posted Mar 02 2013 - 15:14

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 207 battles
  • 678
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010
Hi Noobmeter!

Are you gonna continue this project? I heard that you stepped a little back from playing WoT with your main account ... .


Anyway I made some interesting observations regarding your rating. And my conclusion is that you maybe giving to many points to WR.

On one account I played t8 prem heavy with 2 other good players in platoon. I played my usuall style making around 1.8 - 2.2 K damage but ofc have a much higher WR, than doing the same thing on the other account but without platoon.
The PR for my t8 hvy platoon playing is much better ofc, dispite the fact that I didnt play better/worse. I had just 2 good players (no Emu87s) with me, who changed the typical 1vs29 to 3vs27 ... .

NoobMeter #1484 Posted Mar 04 2013 - 10:45

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 9 battles
  • 436
  • Member since:
    11-14-2012

View PostFolterknecht, on Mar 02 2013 - 15:14, said:

Are you gonna continue this project? I heard that you stepped a little back from playing WoT with your main account ... .

Yes, I'm continuing the project, but currently have a lot going on in work and life so don't have as much time for it as before (when I did spend really lots of time on it).

That should change in the near-term future.

P.S. I plan to add WN7 shortly. Probably replacing WN4.

NoobMeter #1485 Posted Mar 04 2013 - 12:07

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 9 battles
  • 436
  • Member since:
    11-14-2012
WN4 replaced with WN7.

Next step - support for 8.4 new British TDs.

DracoArgentum #1486 Posted Mar 04 2013 - 14:02

    Major

  • Players
  • 12103 battles
  • 2,633
  • [IOC_5] IOC_5
  • Member since:
    09-25-2011
You could probably just dump WN6 to save yourself some server load. It doesn't really do anything that WN7 doesn't.

NoobMeter #1487 Posted Mar 04 2013 - 14:27

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 9 battles
  • 436
  • Member since:
    11-14-2012
Support for tanks added in 8.4 added.

S204STi #1488 Posted Mar 05 2013 - 03:04

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 11042 battles
  • 849
  • Member since:
    08-05-2011
How does your sig functionality work?  I don't see a link for it...

Miyasaki #1489 Posted Mar 07 2013 - 16:27

    Private

  • Players
  • 4645 battles
  • 7
  • [AWFP] AWFP
  • Member since:
    06-16-2011
Eff rating: 933
Performance rating: 1432

What does this even mean? Why the 500 gap?
I have a good portion of my battles in the chaffee passively scouting, but wouldnt that actualy reduce my performance rating?

NoobMeter #1490 Posted Mar 09 2013 - 14:41

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 9 battles
  • 436
  • Member since:
    11-14-2012

View PostS204STi, on Mar 05 2013 - 03:04, said:

How does your sig functionality work?  I don't see a link for it...

Registered players have link to "Settings" ; there you configure signature and get link to it.

NoobMeter #1491 Posted Mar 09 2013 - 14:42

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 9 battles
  • 436
  • Member since:
    11-14-2012
Update - Fixed problem where players who had left clan still were in the clan player list in case they hadn't played much since leaving the clan.

NoobMeter #1492 Posted Mar 09 2013 - 21:21

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 9 battles
  • 436
  • Member since:
    11-14-2012
9th of March - New experimental feature - now showing server tops by recent battles!

NoobMeter #1493 Posted Mar 11 2013 - 20:52

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 9 battles
  • 436
  • Member since:
    11-14-2012
NA clan rating updated:

http://blog.noobmete...tats-march.html

Feel free to republish elsewhere as I don't have enough battles to post to e.g. clan forums.

Folterknecht #1494 Posted Mar 12 2013 - 00:50

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 207 battles
  • 678
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010

View PostNoobMeter, on Mar 11 2013 - 20:52, said:

NA clan rating updated:

http://blog.noobmete...tats-march.html

Feel free to republish elsewhere as I don't have enough battles to post to e.g. clan forums.

Done

UserZero #1495 Posted Mar 15 2013 - 18:53

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 3276 battles
  • 40
  • [NA2EU] NA2EU
  • Member since:
    11-26-2012
A suggestion would be to have two seperate rankings, one for tiers 1-5 (as a suggestion) and another for 6-10.

Hopefully this would eliminate the sealclubbing effect I noticed while looking at a lot of the top ranking people on your list and make the lower levels more noob friendly (possibly showing them that the game can actually be fun right from the start).

From a quick read I saw you did add some things that try and factor this out of your equation, but base on the top rank list it doesn't seem like it's enough.

BanzaiBonsai #1496 Posted Mar 18 2013 - 13:20

    Captain

  • Players
  • 5511 battles
  • 1,690
  • Member since:
    08-11-2012
I think your "recent server top" needs some work.

Spoiler                     
Also think it would be best to have a 1000 battles rating as "recent", I don't think less is relevant as sample size, since it highly depends on what tank/tier you play.

adience #1497 Posted Mar 19 2013 - 02:33

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 15001 battles
  • 508
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    01-25-2012
Eff: 1383
PR: 1747

Suddenly I feel a little better about myself. This system weighs what I consider important, which I rather like. I don't like detecting/capping/defending for Efficiency points.

theMoP #1498 Posted Mar 19 2013 - 05:36

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 22017 battles
  • 203
  • [REL_2] REL_2
  • Member since:
    05-19-2012
really appreciate the tool - been using it for a few months to show me where i need improvement

but... the wn6 / wn7 calculation has been way off for some time now, and eff is off a bit too - frustrating and...doubt-inducing?

just a head's up

thanks again

Praetor77 #1499 Posted Mar 19 2013 - 14:38

    Captain

  • Players
  • 29716 battles
  • 1,695
  • [BADGR] BADGR
  • Member since:
    05-01-2011

View Postadience, on Mar 19 2013 - 02:33, said:

Eff: 1383
PR: 1747

Suddenly I feel a little better about myself. This system weighs what I consider important, which I rather like. I don't like detecting/capping/defending for Efficiency points.

Everybody likes the rating which gives them the highest score!  :teethhappy:

NoobMeter #1500 Posted Mar 20 2013 - 08:28

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 9 battles
  • 436
  • Member since:
    11-14-2012

View PosttheMoP, on Mar 19 2013 - 05:36, said:

really appreciate the tool - been using it for a few months to show me where i need improvement

but... the wn6 / wn7 calculation has been way off for some time now, and eff is off a bit too - frustrating and...doubt-inducing?

just a head's up

thanks again

When you say "off" what do you mean?

Can you please provide specifics why you think it is off?




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users