Jump to content


www.NoobMeter.com - WoT performance rating (player comparison tool)

performance efficiency rating comparison tool noobmeter www.noobmeter.com

  • Please log in to reply
1826 replies to this topic

jdlalonde #41 Posted Nov 19 2012 - 16:46

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 21938 battles
  • 651
  • Member since:
    05-06-2012
I like it for the fact individual tank stats are easy to get.

Deusmortis #42 Posted Nov 19 2012 - 16:48

    Major

  • Veteran Testers
  • 18977 battles
  • 4,722
  • [SIMP] SIMP
  • Member since:
    10-03-2010
Noticed another oddity.  Looked up the #1 global rating player, hammer91.  Guy is damn good, with a sky high efficiency score, but his noobmeter rating is below mine.  His average damage and win rate are significantly higher than mine.  No idea how the system rates me ahead of him.

I think the algorithm needs a bit of work still.

arag0n78 #43 Posted Nov 19 2012 - 16:48

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 7371 battles
  • 80
  • Member since:
    08-10-2011

View Postrazzi123, on Nov 19 2012 - 16:14, said:

These stat need to be shifted in this way

Poor players= below 700

Below average player=700-900

Average= 900-1100

Above average= 1100-1300

Good= 1300-1500

Great=1500-1700

Unicum= 1700+

The majority of Na players is between 900 and 1100

i do like this this would make me unicum :D

otakuben #44 Posted Nov 19 2012 - 16:52

    Major

  • Players
  • 10664 battles
  • 6,413
  • Member since:
    03-20-2011
I have a 1308 which puts me at a above average rating. According to efficiency I'm average and my W/R places me at average. So not sure if it's wrong though people have said Efficiency is flawed.

Edited by otakuben, Nov 19 2012 - 16:54.


NoobMeter #45 Posted Nov 19 2012 - 16:53

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 9 battles
  • 436
  • Member since:
    11-14-2012

View PostFolterknecht, on Nov 19 2012 - 16:18, said:

Add avg tier level to the stats displayed pls!
Especially for you - done.

Shortcult #46 Posted Nov 19 2012 - 16:54

    Captain

  • Players
  • 16472 battles
  • 1,705
  • [-AK-] -AK-
  • Member since:
    08-21-2012
Very cool, hope the project continues smoothly.  Will be checking it regularly.

NoobMeter #47 Posted Nov 19 2012 - 16:55

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 9 battles
  • 436
  • Member since:
    11-14-2012

View PostAMartin223, on Nov 19 2012 - 16:23, said:

Question, do you include spotting damage or XP?  Just curious how this would rate a dedicated scout tank player.
Dedicated scout players are rare, but their ratings would not be very accurate.

I don't have access to spotting damage or XP (from WG). I am ignoring "initial spots" that efficiency rating uses, as these are too easy to get while suicide-spotting, dying in the first 60 seconds having accomplished nothing.


Veril #48 Posted Nov 19 2012 - 16:56

    Major

  • Players
  • 17104 battles
  • 2,046
  • [-G-] -G-
  • Member since:
    11-07-2011
You need to make it ignore the anomalies. It says my rating is 2,027 and it's obviously too low, it must be considering my tanks from the noob days like IS3, IS, KV1 etc...

Zergling #49 Posted Nov 19 2012 - 16:56

    Major

  • Players
  • 16684 battles
  • 4,681
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    02-09-2011
Puts me at 1335 Performance, versus 1244 efficiency.

Bit higher than I expected, as my stats are rather average in most areas. While I have improved in the last few months (with good stats on recently played tanks), my older stats drag me down to the average area.

Harnisfechten #50 Posted Nov 19 2012 - 16:57

    Major

  • Players
  • 16517 battles
  • 5,907
  • [VANDL] VANDL
  • Member since:
    06-09-2012
Performance: 1399
Efficiency: 1199


This new thing puts me closer to GarBad. Cool.

Everyone is familiar with the winrate and efficiency skill, and where they fit on that scale, but can we get some scale on this new performance rating?
Like, what's the server average? What's the distribution?

Edited by Harnisfechten, Nov 19 2012 - 16:58.


CAMN #51 Posted Nov 19 2012 - 16:59

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 14555 battles
  • 3,198
  • [HARM] HARM
  • Member since:
    10-11-2010
From wot-news:

Efficiency rating
1743.15

(1500-1800 Great players)

From noobmeter:

Performance rating:  1,788
Efficiency rating:  1,692

(1700 to 1900 - great player)


So I'm a "great player" in both...  that's weird, I surely don't feel like a "great player" at all.  :Smile_confused:
At least their are both consistent on the data and the stats.

Painbringer71 #52 Posted Nov 19 2012 - 17:00

    Major

  • Players
  • 18268 battles
  • 3,792
  • [DHO3] DHO3
  • Member since:
    05-22-2012

View PostNoobMeter, on Nov 19 2012 - 16:06, said:

That's very nice but I probably have about 17,000 battles across my accounts.

That being said, I do indeed only have 9 on the North American server (all done today). I hope you don't hold that against me, my ping is better on the EU server.

9battles

"then post in your other accounts" troll away

Edited by Painbringer71, Nov 19 2012 - 17:02.


NoobMeter #53 Posted Nov 19 2012 - 17:01

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 9 battles
  • 436
  • Member since:
    11-14-2012

View PostDayus, on Nov 19 2012 - 16:24, said:

Would be nice to see your individual tank performance rating.
Yes, but I don't have the data from WG to do it :(.

Dareios #54 Posted Nov 19 2012 - 17:02

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 14167 battles
  • 321
  • [M--M] M--M
  • Member since:
    01-10-2012
hmmm.

eficiency 931
performance 1211.


guess it definitely weighs things differently.


nice work. will keep an eye on development.

NoobMeter #55 Posted Nov 19 2012 - 17:03

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 9 battles
  • 436
  • Member since:
    11-14-2012

View PostFolterknecht, on Nov 19 2012 - 16:31, said:

@ Noobometer:

Will the you display the "noobfactor" for every played tank at some point?
Not quite sure what you mean, but if you mean performance rating per tank, then I don't have the data for it from WarGaming.

Shatara422 #56 Posted Nov 19 2012 - 17:03

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 8076 battles
  • 400
  • [ERAD] ERAD
  • Member since:
    07-18-2011
noobmeter.com:

Performance: 1,365
Efficiency: 1,365

wot-news.com:
Efficiency: 1155.3

Well, your tool seems to have better opinion of my performance at least :D

Personally, I'd like the ability to see ratings by class, nation, tier, etc.

Edit: aaaand right above me he says that's not doable XD

Edited by Shatara422, Nov 19 2012 - 17:11.


NoobMeter #57 Posted Nov 19 2012 - 17:05

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 9 battles
  • 436
  • Member since:
    11-14-2012

View PostDeusmortis, on Nov 19 2012 - 16:48, said:

Noticed another oddity.  Looked up the #1 global rating player, hammer91.  Guy is damn good, with a sky high efficiency score, but his noobmeter rating is below mine.  His average damage and win rate are significantly higher than mine.  No idea how the system rates me ahead of him.
Too much VK3601H with Konisch.

ivanmurphy #58 Posted Nov 19 2012 - 17:05

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 28092 battles
  • 539
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011
everyone seems to have better performance but drop in the rating charts.

Edited by ivanmurphy, Nov 19 2012 - 17:07.


Dockmaster #59 Posted Nov 19 2012 - 17:06

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 34262 battles
  • 2,741
  • [ACES] ACES
  • Member since:
    01-23-2011
Performance: 1594

Efficiency: 1590

Not sure what constitutes the difference of 4 points between the two systems.

Zergling #60 Posted Nov 19 2012 - 17:11

    Major

  • Players
  • 16684 battles
  • 4,681
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    02-09-2011
So... lets start checking the Performance Rating of some known terrible players.

Content removed.


Naming and shaming.
Warning issued.
~Raizei




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users