Main page

razzi123, on Nov 19 2012 - 16:14, said:

i think that is set too low.  It would put me in the Unicum bracket.  I'm good, but not quite at that level.  I also looked up the worst player that I personally know of, and he was at 911.  A sub-40% player with multiple tier 10s should not be in the "average" bracket.

Deusmortis, on Nov 19 2012 - 16:42, said:

The formula would need to be adjusted as well as the OP sed it is in the alpha stage. once the numbers stabilize these numbers will be more feasible

I like it for the fact individual tank stats are easy to get.

Noticed another oddity.  Looked up the #1 global rating player, hammer91.  Guy is damn good, with a sky high efficiency score, but his noobmeter rating is below mine.  His average damage and win rate are significantly higher than mine.  No idea how the system rates me ahead of him.

I think the algorithm needs a bit of work still.

razzi123, on Nov 19 2012 - 16:14, said:

i do like this this would make me unicum :D

I have a 1308 which puts me at a above average rating. According to efficiency I'm average and my W/R places me at average. So not sure if it's wrong though people have said Efficiency is flawed.
Edited by otakuben, Nov 19 2012 - 16:54.

Folterknecht, on Nov 19 2012 - 16:18, said:

Especially for you - done.

Very cool, hope the project continues smoothly.  Will be checking it regularly.

AMartin223, on Nov 19 2012 - 16:23, said:

Dedicated scout players are rare, but their ratings would not be very accurate.

I don't have access to spotting damage or XP (from WG). I am ignoring "initial spots" that efficiency rating uses, as these are too easy to get while suicide-spotting, dying in the first 60 seconds having accomplished nothing.

You need to make it ignore the anomalies. It says my rating is 2,027 and it's obviously too low, it must be considering my tanks from the noob days like IS3, IS, KV1 etc...

Puts me at 1335 Performance, versus 1244 efficiency.

Bit higher than I expected, as my stats are rather average in most areas. While I have improved in the last few months (with good stats on recently played tanks), my older stats drag me down to the average area.

Performance: 1399
Efficiency: 1199


This new thing puts me closer to GarBad. Cool.

Everyone is familiar with the winrate and efficiency skill, and where they fit on that scale, but can we get some scale on this new performance rating?
Like, what's the server average? What's the distribution?
Edited by Harnisfechten, Nov 19 2012 - 16:58.

From wot-news:

Efficiency rating
1743.15

(1500-1800 Great players)

From noobmeter:

Performance rating:  1,788
Efficiency rating:  1,692

(1700 to 1900 - great player)


So I'm a "great player" in both...  that's weird, I surely don't feel like a "great player" at all.  
At least their are both consistent on the data and the stats.

NoobMeter, on Nov 19 2012 - 16:06, said:

9battles

"then post in your other accounts" troll away
Edited by Painbringer71, Nov 19 2012 - 17:02.

Dayus, on Nov 19 2012 - 16:24, said:

Yes, but I don't have the data from WG to do it :(.

hmmm.

eficiency 931
performance 1211.


guess it definitely weighs things differently.


nice work. will keep an eye on development.

Folterknecht, on Nov 19 2012 - 16:31, said:

Not quite sure what you mean, but if you mean performance rating per tank, then I don't have the data for it from WarGaming.

noobmeter.com:

Performance: 1,365
Efficiency: 1,365

wot-news.com:
Efficiency: 1155.3

Well, your tool seems to have better opinion of my performance at least :D

Personally, I'd like the ability to see ratings by class, nation, tier, etc.

Edit: aaaand right above me he says that's not doable XD
Edited by Shatara422, Nov 19 2012 - 17:11.

Painbringer71, on Nov 19 2012 - 17:00, said:

If you show us, how you post with your NA-Account on EU-Server we ll follow your lead ...

Deusmortis, on Nov 19 2012 - 16:48, said:

Too much VK3601H with Konisch.