Posted Jan 10 2013 - 02:18
Posted Jan 10 2013 - 10:32
Posted Jan 10 2013 - 11:22
Petitioning WG to reorganize scrims and starve you and your team of quality practice isn't a good way to make improvements.
TD;DR - Winning in scrims does't mean a whole lot if you want practice (you know, the point of scrims).
Posted Jan 10 2013 - 15:01
I think to improve the teams from the NA server, the best teams should fight the other awesome team. If they compete against the worst teams in the division, it's no practice for them, just noob harvesting.
Another advantage from division play is that inactive teams will come in last by default, so they can be eliminated from the tournament more easily in the next week.
Posted Jan 14 2013 - 04:23
Posted Jan 16 2013 - 22:15
Does this mean the other servers are also trying out the 43 point limit?
Posted Jan 16 2013 - 22:35
Posted Jan 16 2013 - 22:57
Posted Jan 16 2013 - 23:00
Posted Jan 17 2013 - 02:11
Edited by Sov13t, Jan 17 2013 - 02:14.
Posted Jan 17 2013 - 04:52
Posted Jan 18 2013 - 09:46
Posted Jan 18 2013 - 19:58
Posted Jan 19 2013 - 00:14
Might have just missed out, but doesn't really matter now. all good.
Posted Jan 20 2013 - 02:24
Posted Jan 21 2013 - 05:27
The objective of scrimmages are to give teams the opportunity to practice organized, competitive gameplay using the 7v7 43 point format. The following rules describe the structure of this event:
Teams are dispersed into equivalent, round-robin groups.
The team with the most points after group play is complete is considered the winner of that group.
The tournament concludes immediately after group play.
With a maximum number of 7 players per battle and team, a team must field a selection of tanks based on the below tier limits. Teams are limited to a maximum total of 43 tier points.
Edited by Engage, Jan 21 2013 - 05:27.
Posted Jan 21 2013 - 14:39
In the registration conditions, (which have been removed after registration closed) it did say that a team could register with 10 players as a maximum.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users