Jump to content


failing to understand WG's reasoning

why cap arty to 5 per side?

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
151 replies to this topic

ROMEU #121 Posted Dec 28 2012 - 11:47

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 10955 battles
  • 634
  • Member since:
    02-19-2011

View PostRevanant, on Dec 28 2012 - 11:33, said:

Hey sorry if I'm wrong but didn't you change the MM to accomidate t10 mediums and TD's? How was that significantly different from making t10 arty? I'm honoestly just curious, as I've seen some of these problems before and realize something added could have easily confused the process.
In the case of tier 10 meds and tds its only add the new tier 10, in the arty case all tree is gone to change;

1-You need 2 news arty models for nation in game today;
2-You need to balance all arty;

This take time.

Scav #122 Posted Dec 28 2012 - 11:51

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 22439 battles
  • 2,032
  • Member since:
    01-19-2011

View PostGeneralDirection, on Dec 27 2012 - 20:33, said:

There are a bevy of technical issues that spring up with a cap lower than 5. ....

Unless you want to get into battles with 12 SPGs on one team and none on the other.

I don't understand this reasoning. Just make Random Matches = 0 arty. Problem solved.

GeneralDirection #123 Posted Dec 28 2012 - 11:53

    Major

  • Administrator
  • 5960 battles
  • 3,027
  • [WGA-A] WGA-A
  • Member since:
    08-22-2011

View PostScav, on Dec 28 2012 - 11:51, said:

I don't understand this reasoning. Just make Random Matches = 0 arty. Problem solved.

That would make it nearly impossible to play through SPG branches for the majority of the player base. We may as well remove them from the game at that point (No to that).

xxSLINKxx #124 Posted Dec 28 2012 - 11:54

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 6891 battles
  • 96
  • [UMB] UMB
  • Member since:
    03-01-2012
5 tank types. cap to 3 tanks of the same type.  If this ain't balance enough, I'm not sure about the game anymore.

cwjian90 #125 Posted Dec 28 2012 - 11:54

    Major

  • Players
  • 8871 battles
  • 7,950
  • [C-BOO] C-BOO
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012
Are you actually adding new Tier 9/10 artillery or just pushing up the current Tier 7/8s into Tier 9/10s? There seems to be some confusion about that?

Scav #126 Posted Dec 28 2012 - 11:57

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 22439 battles
  • 2,032
  • Member since:
    01-19-2011

View PostGeneralDirection, on Dec 28 2012 - 11:53, said:

...We may as well remove them from the game at that point ..

I like the way ya thinkin'. I think quite a few players are gonna be happy, if ya remove arty (well, atleast till ya introduce tier 10 arties and lower the cap from 5 to circa 2-3). No harm in posting a poll.

And yes, the devs certaintly can work on something that has been bothering the comunity since beta. We DON'T need anymore game braking auto-loader tanks.

Timbo911 #127 Posted Dec 28 2012 - 11:59

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 18599 battles
  • 243
  • Member since:
    07-03-2011

View PostGeneralDirection, on Dec 28 2012 - 11:43, said:

if we altered it too significantly

Thanks WG/WoT for the insights.
Regardless of my own position on current gameplay, it is only logical to progressively introduce minor amendments with each update rather than over-shooting for an intended outcome and potentially creating an unplayable or extreme version of the current game.

Despite this, there will always be those who feel aggrieved for whatever reasons and motivations related to expectations and interpretations, player skill, education and social upbringing, etc.

GeneralDirection #128 Posted Dec 28 2012 - 12:02

    Major

  • Administrator
  • 5960 battles
  • 3,027
  • [WGA-A] WGA-A
  • Member since:
    08-22-2011

View Postcwjian90, on Dec 28 2012 - 11:54, said:

Are you actually adding new Tier 9/10 artillery or just pushing up the current Tier 7/8s into Tier 9/10s? There seems to be some confusion about that?

It's still being decided. In some cases you'll probably see the tier 8s move to tier 10. It's not like we're going to drop harder hitters on you (exception potentially being the SturmTiger...).

cwjian90 #129 Posted Dec 28 2012 - 12:04

    Major

  • Players
  • 8871 battles
  • 7,950
  • [C-BOO] C-BOO
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012

View PostGeneralDirection, on Dec 28 2012 - 12:02, said:

It's still being decided. In some cases you'll probably see the tier 8s move to tier 10. It's not like we're going to drop harder hitters on you (exception potentially being the SturmTiger...).

I see. If the Germans get the Sturmtiger, I hope the Soviets get the Tyulpan. :)

Steelpumpkin #130 Posted Dec 28 2012 - 12:51

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 855 battles
  • 193
  • [7-H] 7-H
  • Member since:
    02-28-2011

View PostGeneralDirection, on Dec 28 2012 - 11:53, said:

That would make it nearly impossible to play through SPG branches for the majority of the player base. We may as well remove them from the game at that point (No to that).

Interesting, So even WG knows most of us would rather play WITHOUT arty... and, of course, this isn't telling you anything? Like it's a bad mechanic that hurts your game in the long run? I guess I'll have to join my friends and leave. It's obvious you really have no plans to fix anything arty related. Oh and just so you know and it can't be misrepresented later we left because of this games arty mechanics.

Edited by Steelpumpkin, Dec 28 2012 - 12:58.


HighPitch #131 Posted Dec 28 2012 - 12:54

    Major

  • Players
  • 43426 battles
  • 7,500
  • [MO] MO
  • Member since:
    05-24-2011
Well, any cap is better than no cap, I guess.

ShivaX #132 Posted Dec 28 2012 - 12:55

    Major

  • Players
  • 34283 battles
  • 5,140
  • [3PZG] 3PZG
  • Member since:
    04-18-2011
Can we also make the MM pretend to balance the teams again?

As much fun as it is for once team to be better across the board than the other... it gets old fast.

Its like Team A gets an extra Tier8 arty, 2 extra Tier10s and an extra Tier9 and MM says "that looks fair".

Tolos #133 Posted Dec 28 2012 - 13:02

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 25997 battles
  • 14,952
  • [4HEAD] 4HEAD
  • Member since:
    09-22-2010

View PostSteelpumpkin, on Dec 28 2012 - 12:51, said:

Interesting, So even WG knows most of us would rather play WITHOUT arty... and, of course, this isn't telling you anything? Like it's a bad mechanic that hurts your game in the long run? I guess I'll have to join my friends and leave. It's obvious you really have no plans to fix anything arty related. Oh and just so you know and it can't be misrepresented later we left because of this games arty mechanics.

Where do you people get the " Most of us would rather play without arty ", in EVERY single poll ever done on these forums, its only a number cap that ALWAYS comes out on top but a HUGE margin.  Very few people want arty removed, most of us want a number cap, that being said, I still think 5 is to high.

If you REALLY want to play no arty games just make a TC.

Steelpumpkin #134 Posted Dec 28 2012 - 13:08

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 855 battles
  • 193
  • [7-H] 7-H
  • Member since:
    02-28-2011

View PostTolos, on Dec 28 2012 - 13:02, said:

Where do you people get the " Most of us would rather play without arty ", in EVERY single poll ever done on these forums, its only a number cap that ALWAYS comes out on top but a HUGE margin.  Very few people want arty removed, most of us want a number cap, that being said, I still think 5 is to high.

If you REALLY want to play no arty games just make a TC.

You obviously can't or don't read. The WG guy said they won't add a no arty mode because they believe few would play with arty enabled and SPGs would become very hard to level. So if they know that given the option that most players would turn it off it's obvious not many people like it. I think most arty players know that given the choice they'd be extinct.

Edited by Steelpumpkin, Dec 28 2012 - 13:12.


dance210 #135 Posted Dec 28 2012 - 13:48

    Associate eSports Manager

  • Administrator
  • 22002 battles
  • 3,244
  • [WGA-A] WGA-A
  • Member since:
    05-31-2012

View PostSteelpumpkin, on Dec 28 2012 - 13:08, said:

You obviously can't or don't read. The WG guy said they won't add a no arty mode because they believe few would play with arty enabled and SPGs would become very hard to level. So if they know that given the option that most players would turn it off it's obvious not many people like it. I think most arty players know that given the choice they'd be extinct.

Actually, if you look back to the quote GD was responding to, the ONLY suggestion was to remove arty from Random Battles, not to have arty and arty-free modes. Removing arty from Random means you can only play in TC, Clan Wars - which would make it hard/impossible for the majority of the players to go through the branches and level up.

View PostScav, on Dec 28 2012 - 11:51, said:

I don't understand this reasoning. Just make Random Matches = 0 arty. Problem solved.

View PostGeneralDirection, on Dec 28 2012 - 11:53, said:

That would make it nearly impossible to play through SPG branches for the majority of the player base. We may as well remove them from the game at that point (No to that).


Tolos #136 Posted Dec 28 2012 - 13:53

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 25997 battles
  • 14,952
  • [4HEAD] 4HEAD
  • Member since:
    09-22-2010

View PostSteelpumpkin, on Dec 28 2012 - 13:08, said:

You obviously can't or don't read. The WG guy said they won't add a no arty mode because they believe few would play with arty enabled and SPGs would become very hard to level. So if they know that given the option that most players would turn it off it's obvious not many people like it. I think most arty players know that given the choice they'd be extinct.

And you obviously do not know what reading comprehension is. It might be an idea to read what was written before you comment .

What you think is irrelevant, the facts point to that nearly every player wants a CAP ( yes even arty players ), not for them to be removed.

And yes there IS an option to play none Arty games, they are called TC's, if arty bothers you that much, go play those.

PlayMp1 #137 Posted Dec 28 2012 - 14:57

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 2299 battles
  • 682
  • Member since:
    07-06-2012

View PostGeneralDirection, on Dec 27 2012 - 20:33, said:

There are a bevy of technical issues that spring up with a cap lower than 5. Once we introduce tier 9 and 10 SPGs we might be able to lower the cap, but right now 5 is the lowest it can be set to with the way the matchmaker works.

Unless you want to get into battles with 12 SPGs on one team and none on the other.

This helps me understand much better. I was one of those advocating a cap at 3, but if there's a ton of issues that would require an overhaul of the matchmaker to lower the cap that much, I'll deal with the 5 artillery cap.

buras #138 Posted Dec 28 2012 - 15:57

    Corporal

  • Beta Testers
  • 19195 battles
  • 81
  • [PING] PING
  • Member since:
    09-26-2010
When you introduce Tier 10 arties without changing matchmaker, will this situation be possible:
1x Tier 10 arty VS 1x Tier 10 Heavy/med/td
14x Tier 9 and lower tier tanks VS 14x Tier 9 and lower tier tanks
?
ninjaedit: Thats a 15v15 match
because that would be totally retarded

Dent781 #139 Posted Dec 28 2012 - 15:59

    Captain

  • Players
  • 16341 battles
  • 1,043
  • Member since:
    06-26-2011

View PostGeneralDirection, on Dec 27 2012 - 20:33, said:

There are a bevy of technical issues that spring up with a cap lower than 5. Once we introduce tier 9 and 10 SPGs we might be able to lower the cap, but right now 5 is the lowest it can be set to with the way the matchmaker works.

Unless you want to get into battles with 12 SPGs on one team and none on the other.

MM is a horror show if that is the case. Is it really so hard to include an exception into the MM code stating no more than X number of Y vehicle types (arty) per game?

5 Arty per game is a nightmare. 4 Arty in a game typically ruins the match. 3 is the most I can work with without being so distracted that I'm not enjoying the game.

I don't even know why you people even bothered to change the cap to 5, when 3 would of been significantly better. Putting work into MM making 5 the max seems like a giant waste of time. Should of kept going on the work till it was down to 3.

This sounds like a SWTOR dev team excuse, where the dev team gives weird technical reasons that sound like "the product we invented is so complicated we dont know how to modify it efficiently"  which eventually lead that game being where it is today - dead. Please dont do that, WG. You're so much better than that as a company.

Arty is a major problem. The problem is not that it has to much HP, or it can drive around to much. The problem is there is to much arty in a match, and people get smoked by them in seconds. 5 is more than enough to smoke any tank in the game seconds after being spotted, even if 2 or 3 of the 5 hit.

Poultryphile #140 Posted Dec 28 2012 - 16:47

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 16327 battles
  • 996
  • Member since:
    10-12-2011

View PostNightMist1, on Dec 27 2012 - 23:35, said:

I disagree with your statement based on these very forums.

There are so many in here that seem to think arty is a great thing.  How many times do we have to hear that arty fixes camping, arty is good for the game etc.....

If arty is so great and so many people love it, the I would expect that there would be no 15v15 matches.  From my understanding there will be 2 que's.

So those that think its a wonderful thing can still play with it.


But if in fact everyone clicks the button then I guess that will once and for all tell us what most of us already know, arty ruins this tank game, of course arty players are afraid and know that will be the answer.


How many matches have you or the rest of us had where there is no arty?  How many people commented on it and how happy did that make them? Not everyone wants to be in arty matches.



The simple fix however would be to fix the current form of arty, it is the simplest solution, but again, when you have developers that like to play arty, they of course are going to leave it in it's Over powered state that we currently have.

Of course arty players don't want to hear that.


So why not let the customer play how they choose?  Give us an option!!!!!!!!!!!!

It's not that simple though. Arty is good for the game but it does make the game more challenging sometimes for tanks.
How often will lazy people and poor players choose what is easier vs what is better?
I personally enjoy playing arty and having it in the game as long as it's not overdone however I know how tempting it would be to play without it sometimes.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users