Jump to content


Give Us More Encounter and Assault Maps


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
11 replies to this topic

Tazilon #1 Posted Dec 30 2012 - 17:02

    Major

  • Players
  • 58352 battles
  • 5,551
  • [-40-] -40-
  • Member since:
    09-02-2011
I don't get it Wargaming.  Every update we get updated maps which already existed and no new Assault and Encounter Maps.  

We NEED new Assault and Encounter Maps WAY MORE than we need reworked preexisting maps.  We only have 6 Assault Maps!  We have 9 Encounter Maps.  We THIRTY standard Maps.   Quit spending time on Standard Maps until we have at least 15+ Encounter and Assault Maps.  

We are TIRED of playing the same Encounter and Assault Maps over and over and over!

redplauge #2 Posted Dec 30 2012 - 17:07

    Captain

  • Players
  • 15234 battles
  • 1,089
  • [_7TH_] _7TH_
  • Member since:
    02-27-2011
begin flames in 3...2...1...

DrewDoughty #3 Posted Dec 30 2012 - 17:08

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 20980 battles
  • 2,195
  • [TYR] TYR
  • Member since:
    09-15-2010

View Postredplauge, on Dec 30 2012 - 17:07, said:

begin flames in 3...2...1...
http://www.tousenliv...ette-flamme.jpg

Who is still playing Assault?

ChillyCoyote #4 Posted Dec 30 2012 - 17:13

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 17879 battles
  • 59
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    02-26-2012
i still play assault  :Smile_confused:

julian554327 #5 Posted Dec 30 2012 - 17:13

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 11732 battles
  • 408
  • Member since:
    02-21-2011
http://www.youtube.c...player_embedded

ed_anger #6 Posted Dec 30 2012 - 17:16

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 13816 battles
  • 7,604
  • [-G-] -G-
  • Member since:
    07-01-2010
i'm guessing the majority have turned off Assault.

i'd like to see new maps period. WG has been reworking maps for too long, time for some new ones.

Dukaan #7 Posted Dec 30 2012 - 17:19

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 15730 battles
  • 867
  • Member since:
    09-11-2011
I'll admit, I'd play Assault if there were more maps... Never liked Encounter but I dont mind assault.

redplauge #8 Posted Dec 30 2012 - 17:29

    Captain

  • Players
  • 15234 battles
  • 1,089
  • [_7TH_] _7TH_
  • Member since:
    02-27-2011
i admit i play both just for the variety. but, by my understanding, the vast majority of players have turned off both.

as for the reworking, that was for the physics that came in. more new maps, and posibly more encounter and/or assault maps, should be starting up "soon" . once enough new maps are in theres going to be a "major" change in clan wars.

BountyHunter177 #9 Posted Dec 30 2012 - 17:30

    Major

  • Players
  • 12952 battles
  • 5,817
  • [PING] PING
  • Member since:
    01-05-2012
Assault? Whats that?

I do enjoy encounter just as much as standard though.

Edited by BountyHunter177, Dec 30 2012 - 17:30.


Millbarge #10 Posted Dec 30 2012 - 17:32

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 34792 battles
  • 4,536
  • Member since:
    01-18-2011
I think Assault and Encounter could both be great if they had new, dedicated maps made with those modes in mind...

but overall i am always in favor of more maps.

Gilthos #11 Posted Dec 30 2012 - 17:43

    Captain

  • Players
  • 5569 battles
  • 1,220
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011
Meh. There are bigger things that need attention first.

12lfink #12 Posted Dec 30 2012 - 17:44

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 7334 battles
  • 20
  • [STARK] STARK
  • Member since:
    04-20-2012
I'd play assault more if the time limit was longer and gave the offensive side to strategically.  But the main reason I turned assault off was because of being  on the offensive team at Malinovka because it is impossible to attack up hill when they can spot you way before you can spot them.

Always need more maps and need to bring back maps they took out.  Like swamps.