29 replies to this topic

[Gaea]

Post your feedback here about the Soviet tank changes!

You can see the 8.3 patch notes here.

Edited by Gaea, Jan 18 2013 - 01:26.

[ghostrider454]

I have two feed backs to send you.
1) Hit points should not have been dropped
2) SU-26 rounds should have stayed the same.
There are times when I have had to use all the rounds to win the game.

[Cartoonman]

I would have rathered that arty nerfs be held back until a full Arty tree rebalancing be done.

[PelicanGuy]

The SU-26 should have kept the same number of rounds. It runs out enough already. The other nerfs on it were warranted.

[Neverwish]

I will give my feedback on what didn't change: The damn BL-10 sound.

Worst non-change ever.

[Keckers]

Not enough rebalancing of all the old tanks in game to account for all the new tanks in game...soviets included.

[Beerstein]

Why buff the shells on the SU-5 small gun but not large one? Complaints have been with the large one, the buff on the small one will have absolutely no effect on the game, little disappointed there. Also I do have some issue with SU-14 aim being nerfed on turning the tank with such low traverse degrees.

I'd also have preferred an armor drop over hitpoint drop to prevent freaky bounces but retain the ability to take a shot at all. A scout autocannon at long range shouldn't have as large a chance as it now does to actually take down an artillery piece.

Just tested the gun elevation changes on the SU-5, not a fan. It has too many disadvantages over other artillery now.

Elevation angle of Gun 152 mm Mortar NM mod. 1931changed from -45 degrees to -72 degrees

[scorp11]

1 near misses rapes my conq for round 1/3 hp's and tears up a moduel or two and kills my driver and or gunnerand thats just a t6 /7 arty, god help me if it hits me. Then IF / when i finally crawl and claw my way to the obj and see an arty i shoot him and he laughs as he turns with what hp's he has left and melts my face.

Maybe its because of how crappy brit tanks are, but i still think the arties Still need more hp's taken from them OR drop their damage some.

[Pollenz]

This is sadly:



Is pointless have the last track if you can't load all the equipment that you want. I'll have to choice of using the rammer without camo net/binos or not use camo net/binos (buying equipment for more weight capacity).

And also the shells of the Su 26. Lots of battles used all the shells, now it has less -.-

[Beerstein]

Pollenz, on Jan 18 2013 - 03:29, said:

This is sadly:

[img]http://i49.tinypic.com/vx1yd1.jpg[/*img]

Is pointless have the last track if you can't load all the equipment that you want. I'll have to choice of using the rammer without camo net/binos or not use camo net/binos (buying equipment for more weight capacity).

And also the shells of the Su 26. Lots of battles used all the shells, now it has less -.-

If it does well with what it has it should be able to influence a win by the time it runs out if it is actively engaging threatening opponents. This is one reason I complained more about the addition to the small gun on the SU-5 which does nothing (as a faux buff) rather than complaining about the 14 shells not being buffed (which would be a real buff) and why my main issue is the elevation change.

[Diacom]

So, the issue has been quantity over quality and you folks chose to choke back the quality rather than deal with the quantity issue.

Sorry, these changes are un called for to balance, just set max to 3 arty and the rest would have sorted itself out.

[8112204]

SU-26 seems to have also had a range nerf from 620 or so to 560. The ammunition rationing is also most irritating. However, with decreased weight but the same engine, it gains more acceleration. We can live with that.

[FastForward7]

Unless I'm reading this wrong they've turned the 212 into an even more immobile pig with even worse recticle bloom?  Awesome. As a guy who plays maybe 20 arty games a week in his 212 this sucks. As another poster said all we needed was a cap.

[Rypper]

FastForward7, on Jan 18 2013 - 04:07, said:

Unless I'm reading this wrong they've turned the 212 into an even more immobile pig with even worse recticle bloom?  Awesome. As a guy who plays maybe 20 arty games a week in his 212 this sucks. As another poster said all we needed was a cap.

Well, it was rather powerful before the nerf. If my stupid team didn't let the light through and I survived till the end, I usually done 3K damage. I also never done 7800 damage in a tank in one battle, like I did in the Object 212. Taking into account I was killed in the middle of that battle, it's damage potential was probably a bit too much.

Not that I am complaining. I am just happy I have elited mine already

[AzureTerra]

Its most irritating to fire a shell that does 1850 Avg damage and see it repeatedly splash tanks for 250-280 damage. A 203mm shell landing next to a Tank should be doing much more than that.

Why was the Reserve Speed of the S-51 reduced - how is the ability to drive decently fast backwards OP?

[Fatigatti_AR]

Pollenz, on Jan 18 2013 - 03:29, said:

This is sadly:



Is pointless have the last track if you can't load all the equipment that you want. I'll have to choice of using the rammer without camo net/binos or not use camo net/binos (buying equipment for more weight capacity).

And also the shells of the Su 26. Lots of battles used all the shells, now it has less -.-

Maybe a Big Weigth BUG

[Fatigatti_AR]

Pollenz, on Jan 18 2013 - 03:29, said:

This is sadly:



Is pointless have the last track if you can't load all the equipment that you want. I'll have to choice of using the rammer without camo net/binos or not use camo net/binos (buying equipment for more weight capacity).

And also the shells of the Su 26. Lots of battles used all the shells, now it has less -.-

ç



MAYBE A BIG WEIGHT BUG

[shefsatyr]

Well WG if your goal was to suck the last bits of fun out a line so people would stop playing em in rage, I guess this patch could be considered a "success" Does it do anything other than make anti arty whiners happy? Nope.

[scorp11]

after playing my s-51 and testing it out.. feels a little more sluggish now, but still owns just as much as before.

[Pollenz]

So... Is my 212 bugged or not? Why do I have 57.79 of weight and my friend has 55.29? Any clue?