Jump to content


Trolling on a tier one


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
17 replies to this topic

Fr3ddieMercury #1 Posted Jan 21 2013 - 07:29

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 5207 battles
  • 177
  • [4KAD] 4KAD
  • Member since:
    11-22-2012
Thats me rolling a medium tier 1 tank using the 6 pdr and HE ammo. The normal downside of HE is that it has reduced penetration, but because tier 1 have weak armour i penned every shot.
Anyone else been trolling on tier 1? (I'm looking at you lironman)

Fr3ddieMercury #2 Posted Jan 21 2013 - 07:30

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 5207 battles
  • 177
  • [4KAD] 4KAD
  • Member since:
    11-22-2012
Posted Image

Edited by Fr3ddieMercury, Jan 21 2013 - 07:31.


Blizzard36 #3 Posted Jan 21 2013 - 07:38

    Captain

  • Beta Testers
  • 8464 battles
  • 1,978
  • [RABIT] RABIT
  • Member since:
    12-03-2010
Not tier 1s, but I keep a couple tier 2s and 3s around for when I just want to have fun and not worry about the grind.

battlelord7 #4 Posted Jan 21 2013 - 07:39

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 5713 battles
  • 762
  • Member since:
    12-12-2011
Not surprised you did that with the British derp   Mk.1

nking1299 #5 Posted Jan 21 2013 - 07:41

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 5831 battles
  • 679
  • Member since:
    12-29-2011
So you shot up a bunch of noobs on their first battle? What was the point of this thread? we all know that trolling tier 1s is easy. I'm not trying to sound like an ass but I'm genuinely mystified as to the point of this thread.

kllp101 #6 Posted Jan 21 2013 - 07:54

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 11295 battles
  • 815
  • Member since:
    11-13-2010
Pssh, trolling tier 1s is too mainstream. Gotta troll tier tens.

QJW #7 Posted Jan 21 2013 - 08:02

    Major

  • Players
  • 18736 battles
  • 2,446
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011

View Postkllp101, on Jan 21 2013 - 07:54, said:

Pssh, trolling tier 1s is too mainstream. Gotta troll tier tens.
Nah man, it's all about mid teirs.

Alvin0 #8 Posted Jan 21 2013 - 08:19

    Private

  • Players
  • 490 battles
  • 6
  • Member since:
    06-14-2012

yo,using NC-31


Edited by Alvin0, Jan 21 2013 - 08:20.


A_Defenseless_Kitten #9 Posted Jan 21 2013 - 08:22

    Major

  • Players
  • 22754 battles
  • 6,119
  • [D_D_T] D_D_T
  • Member since:
    07-12-2011
no machine gun I is sadden  :arta:

Valan #10 Posted Jan 21 2013 - 12:40

    Captain

  • Players
  • 21498 battles
  • 1,346
  • Member since:
    07-13-2012

View PostFr3ddieMercury, on Jan 21 2013 - 07:29, said:

Thats me rolling a medium tier 1 tank using the 6 pdr and HE ammo. The normal downside of HE is that it has reduced penetration, but because tier 1 have weak armour i penned every shot.
Anyone else been trolling on tier 1?

Yes, the British MK.1 has a 57mm gun which is a kin to artillery in Tier 1 & 2 matches. The MK.1 is to tier 1, what the T18 is to tier 2.

Not sure why you have decided to pick on an individual who likes to play only lower tier matches. Anyone can decide to do the very same thing, if they so choose too.  It only requires a desire to be "cheap in the pocketbook", and play many games in the lower tiers.  Why do some individuals want only to play at this level?  1) Gold is less of a factor in outcomes; 2) Individuals with Premium Accounts tend to play here less, it seems; 3) Tier 1, 2, 3  tanks are among the best balanced of the tiers overall; 4) Artillery style of playing is less of a factor in the low tier, relative to the middle & higher tiers.

Edited by Valan, Jan 21 2013 - 12:46.


treb #11 Posted Jan 21 2013 - 14:07

    Sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 35431 battles
  • 120
  • [RD] RD
  • Member since:
    09-01-2010
elite pz ii with camo binocs and gold rounds, laugh my ass off the whole battle

Boxhawk #12 Posted Jan 21 2013 - 14:18

    Major

  • Players
  • 12979 battles
  • 2,579
  • Member since:
    04-23-2012
I would say you were playing solidly at your tier competence level.

Fr3ddieMercury #13 Posted Mar 21 2013 - 07:18

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 5207 battles
  • 177
  • [4KAD] 4KAD
  • Member since:
    11-22-2012

View PostBoxhawk, on Jan 21 2013 - 14:18, said:

I would say you were playing solidly at your tier competence level.
Well that was both irrelevant and insulting. When I post, I expect people to be polite.

Fr3ddieMercury #14 Posted Mar 21 2013 - 07:20

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 5207 battles
  • 177
  • [4KAD] 4KAD
  • Member since:
    11-22-2012

View PostValan, on Jan 21 2013 - 12:40, said:



Not sure why you have decided to pick on an individual who likes to play only lower tier matches.
I wasn't picking on him. Just looking at him..

Blazzy #15 Posted Mar 21 2013 - 07:58

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 19978 battles
  • 756
  • [-G-] -G-
  • Member since:
    03-05-2012
I can say after reading this I decided to try it out, so bought one, got a 75% crew and put the 6pdr on it, 14 kills in 2 games, avg roughly 950xp per game(w/ prem), and avg like 500-600 damage haha.  This tank is stupid fun,

Blizzard36 #16 Posted Mar 22 2013 - 15:51

    Captain

  • Beta Testers
  • 8464 battles
  • 1,978
  • [RABIT] RABIT
  • Member since:
    12-03-2010
Yeah, the Mk.1 may be a big soft target, but with the Besa or the top 57mm it definately has the top damage output in that tier. The 57mm can 2 shot anything it faces. It was the only tier 1 I debated keeping.

View Postkllp101, on Jan 21 2013 - 07:54, said:

Pssh, trolling tier 1s is too mainstream. Gotta troll tier tens.

That's what my Hetzer's for.  :trollface:

I've killed all the tier 10 heavies with it but the Germans, blasted skirts!  :angry:  No mediums or TDs yet though, though I've come close a couple times. The mediums mobility makes them much harder to corner someplace you can get the shots in safely, and the TDs usually don't come out that far anyway. I'd have to assault thier position, and that just doesn't work very well.

Honestly, I have fun in those matches even if I don't get much damage in, just because it's hilarious to watch all the credits being expended to try kill you. And if you manage to bounce one, oh man... the reactions are priceless.

FlatCat #17 Posted Mar 22 2013 - 18:09

    Captain

  • Beta Testers
  • 11853 battles
  • 1,861
  • Member since:
    11-28-2010
I like the speed of the tier 1 and 2s you can get some real lol times in them.

Hurk #18 Posted Mar 22 2013 - 18:29

    Major

  • Players
  • 22549 battles
  • 6,887
  • [KGR] KGR
  • Member since:
    09-30-2012

View PostValan, on Jan 21 2013 - 12:40, said:

Yes, the British MK.1 has a 57mm gun which is a kin to artillery in Tier 1 & 2 matches. The MK.1 is to tier 1, what the T18 is to tier 2.

Not sure why you have decided to pick on an individual who likes to play only lower tier matches. Anyone can decide to do the very same thing, if they so choose too.  It only requires a desire to be "cheap in the pocketbook", and play many games in the lower tiers.  Why do some individuals want only to play at this level?  1) Gold is less of a factor in outcomes; 2) Individuals with Premium Accounts tend to play here less, it seems; 3) Tier 1, 2, 3  tanks are among the best balanced of the tiers overall; 4) Artillery style of playing is less of a factor in the low tier, relative to the middle & higher tiers.
lies. people replay low tiers to seal club. an average man is a giant among midgets.