Jump to content


tog 1


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
12 replies to this topic

quetch #1 Posted Apr 10 2013 - 10:02

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 9924 battles
  • 579
  • Member since:
    06-20-2011
hi since we have the tog 2. can we add the tog 1 http://mailer.fsu.ed.../GB-TOG1.jpg  . heres the wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOG1 what you guys think.

Daigensui #2 Posted Apr 10 2013 - 10:03

    Major

  • Wiki Staff
  • 20028 battles
  • 20,451
  • [MUP] MUP
  • Member since:
    11-09-2012
Why would the British need another heavy tank when there is already one (A33 Excelsior) in supertesting?

ket101 #3 Posted Apr 10 2013 - 10:13

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 14780 battles
  • 5,749
  • [N-O-M] N-O-M
  • Member since:
    01-10-2011
And the TOG 1 is a miserable thing.  They stuck a Matilda turret on it, which means Matilda guns, and the 75 from the B1 in the front.  And it was never really finished (and possibly lethal to drive, with the hydraulic drive system).  At least the TOG II* gets the 17 pounder in the Challenger turret.  We've got the best, in relative terms, TOG in the game already.

shadow_wolf2115 #4 Posted Apr 10 2013 - 10:22

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 19606 battles
  • 45
  • [DAWGZ] DAWGZ
  • Member since:
    05-02-2011
XD if u want a land battleship then u need to see the kv-VI tank its a monster that can eat the tog

OOPMan #5 Posted Apr 10 2013 - 10:26

    Major

  • Players
  • 14678 battles
  • 4,045
  • [IOC] IOC
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011

View Postshadow_wolf2115, on Apr 10 2013 - 10:22, said:

XD if u want a land battleship then u need to see the kv-VI tank its a monster that can eat the tog

100% fake.

shadow_wolf2115 #6 Posted Apr 10 2013 - 10:29

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 19606 battles
  • 45
  • [DAWGZ] DAWGZ
  • Member since:
    05-02-2011
i know but still funny that anyone thought about thing as well as the tog

ket101 #7 Posted Apr 10 2013 - 10:44

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 14780 battles
  • 5,749
  • [N-O-M] N-O-M
  • Member since:
    01-10-2011
KV-VI, no, fake, but T-100 and SMK, yes, quite real.

quetch #8 Posted Apr 10 2013 - 10:46

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 9924 battles
  • 579
  • Member since:
    06-20-2011
well it cant hurt haveing 2 types of togs creeping around the map. yes im a proud tog 2 owner.

Col1kill #9 Posted Apr 10 2013 - 11:09

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 16275 battles
  • 781
  • [DRI] DRI
  • Member since:
    09-25-2011
the Tog 1 might become a tier 2-4 in the 2nd British heavy line. as for the comment about the KV-6 it WAS real and all 3 were horrid failure and were lost in prototype phase. 1 broke in half trying to cross a ravine. another was lost when the rear turret shot and destroyed the middle turret. 3rd rolled backwards off a hill when all 3 guns fired in the same direction at the same time.

http://xmb.stuffucan...ad.php?tid=4693

ket101 #10 Posted Apr 10 2013 - 11:34

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 14780 battles
  • 5,749
  • [N-O-M] N-O-M
  • Member since:
    01-10-2011
Oh dear.  Trying to back up his story with a picture of a model someone slapped together, and a photoshopped picture of three T-28's.  Sorry, the tank is a fiction.

quetch #11 Posted Apr 11 2013 - 00:59

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 9924 battles
  • 579
  • Member since:
    06-20-2011
just add the tog 1 as a prem tank.

quetch #12 Posted Apr 11 2013 - 10:32

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 9924 battles
  • 579
  • Member since:
    06-20-2011
bump

rossmum #13 Posted Apr 11 2013 - 10:40

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 20470 battles
  • 4,996
  • [NDP] NDP
  • Member since:
    07-20-2010

View PostCol1kill, on Apr 10 2013 - 11:09, said:

the Tog 1 might become a tier 2-4 in the 2nd British heavy line. as for the comment about the KV-6 it WAS real and all 3 were horrid failure and were lost in prototype phase. 1 broke in half trying to cross a ravine. another was lost when the rear turret shot and destroyed the middle turret. 3rd rolled backwards off a hill when all 3 guns fired in the same direction at the same time.

http://xmb.stuffucan...ad.php?tid=4693
No, it was not real. The real KV-6 was a KV with a flamethrower, from what I recall.

The so-called "KV-VI" is fantasy made up by someone with a bunch of model kits and spare time, and a runaway imagination. It was never designed or built. It would not be possible from an engineering standpoint at any rate.