Jump to content


Revert the Type 62's model

type 62 type 62 historical

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
105 replies to this topic

MisterPatriot #41 Posted May 22 2013 - 02:59

    Major

  • Players
  • 17206 battles
  • 6,661
  • Member since:
    01-19-2011
Here is an overhead view of the Type 62, which is very different from the one in-game (notice the in-game 62 has a fatter hull)

Posted Image

Which looks similar to:

Posted Image

and here are the Type 62/WZ-131 models

Posted Image

Posted Image

MesoTroniK #42 Posted May 22 2013 - 03:05

    Captain

  • Players
  • 27839 battles
  • 1,888
  • Member since:
    04-10-2011
Mr. Patriot.

Your logic is flawless, you cannot be defeated.

The_Chieftain #43 Posted May 22 2013 - 04:16

    Military Specialist

  • Administrator
  • 9470 battles
  • 9,365
  • [WGA-A] WGA-A
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011
Fair question. I must admit to not having actually paid any attention to the response, I just copied/pasted after a brief glance. (I'm a tad busy)

Moving to Firing Line, so I don't forget it.

MisterPatriot #44 Posted May 22 2013 - 05:14

    Major

  • Players
  • 17206 battles
  • 6,661
  • Member since:
    01-19-2011

View PostThe_Chieftain, on May 22 2013 - 04:16, said:

Fair question. I must admit to not having actually paid any attention to the response, I just copied/pasted after a brief glance. (I'm a tad busy)

Moving to Firing Line, so I don't forget it.
Alright thanks a lot for spending your time on this.

Cogent #45 Posted May 22 2013 - 17:06

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 8915 battles
  • 429
  • Member since:
    02-20-2013
In RL pictures the turret does look a lot fatter and rounder. I think it's the turret that needs to be made bigger, not the body made smaller :S

godofdun #46 Posted May 22 2013 - 18:26

    Major

  • Players
  • 8850 battles
  • 4,253
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    07-09-2011
Good call bringing this back up OP.  Hell I was so busy enjoying the buff it received at the time, I'd totally forgotten they'd changed the model when they uptiered it.

PunCzarBlintz #47 Posted May 28 2013 - 14:46

    Major

  • Players
  • 65273 battles
  • 2,609
  • [T-D] T-D
  • Member since:
    10-29-2011
Hmmm, deciding if I want the old model and old stats or the new model and new stats....


Please leave my Type 62 alone... it is fine, I dont care if it is not hysterical, I mean historical.

MisterPatriot #48 Posted Jun 03 2013 - 06:23

    Major

  • Players
  • 17206 battles
  • 6,661
  • Member since:
    01-19-2011
Posted Image

MisterPatriot #49 Posted Jun 03 2013 - 06:25

    Major

  • Players
  • 17206 battles
  • 6,661
  • Member since:
    01-19-2011

View PostColdWar82, on May 28 2013 - 14:46, said:

Hmmm, deciding if I want the old model and old stats or the new model and new stats....


Please leave my Type 62 alone... it is fine, I dont care if it is not hysterical, I mean historical.
Where did I mention reverting the STATS?

This is a suggested MODEL change.

M  O  D  E  L

The_Chieftain #50 Posted Jun 04 2013 - 13:09

    Military Specialist

  • Administrator
  • 9470 battles
  • 9,365
  • [WGA-A] WGA-A
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011
So far, no response from China.

The_Chieftain #51 Posted Jun 06 2013 - 19:10

    Military Specialist

  • Administrator
  • 9470 battles
  • 9,365
  • [WGA-A] WGA-A
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011
Response received:

"The Americans are right. Oops"

Daigensui #52 Posted Jun 06 2013 - 19:36

    Major

  • Players
  • 21710 battles
  • 28,528
  • [KANCO] KANCO
  • Member since:
    11-09-2012

View PostThe_Chieftain, on Jun 06 2013 - 19:10, said:

Response received:

"The Americans are right. Oops"

:teethhappy:  :teethhappy:  :teethhappy:  :trollface:  :trollface:  :trollface:

MotorizedPatriot 1, KongZhong 0

The_Chieftain #53 Posted Jun 06 2013 - 20:32

    Military Specialist

  • Administrator
  • 9470 battles
  • 9,365
  • [WGA-A] WGA-A
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011
Kongzhong?

KaiserWilhelmShatner #54 Posted Jun 06 2013 - 21:15

    Major

  • Players
  • 10465 battles
  • 3,620
  • [LONER] LONER
  • Member since:
    03-03-2012
http://www.flickr.co...66360/lightbox/

T-55, parent of the Type 59.

Daigensui #55 Posted Jun 06 2013 - 21:20

    Major

  • Players
  • 21710 battles
  • 28,528
  • [KANCO] KANCO
  • Member since:
    11-09-2012

View PostThe_Chieftain, on Jun 06 2013 - 20:32, said:

Kongzhong?

I was assuming you were talking with the Chinese company that runs the server over there.

SteelRonin #56 Posted Jun 06 2013 - 21:20

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 21609 battles
  • 3,393
  • Member since:
    09-13-2010
WZ-132 is ugly, Its model is poorly worked. The tracks are ugly, some1 drunk modeled this tank. I was so happy when they change Type-62 model, coz WZ-131 is pretty and the tank has a nice model and textures. Just look WZ-132 tracks, are ugly as hell, It doesnt have a "natural" curve for the gravity.

I don't mind if they change the model of my tank, but at least, IMPROVE THE VISUAL MODEL OF WZ-132.

ty

Edited by SteelRonin, Jun 06 2013 - 21:40.


MisterPatriot #57 Posted Jun 06 2013 - 21:32

    Major

  • Players
  • 17206 battles
  • 6,661
  • Member since:
    01-19-2011

View PostSteelRonin, on Jun 06 2013 - 21:20, said:

WZ-132 is ugly, Its model is poorly worked. The tracks are ugly, some1 drunk modeled this tank. I was so happy when they change Type-62 model, coz WZ-131 is pretty and the tank has a nice model and textures. Just look WZ-132 tracks, are ugly as hell, It doesnt have a "natural" curve for the gravitiy.

I don't mind if they change the model of my tank, but at least, IMPROVE THE VISUAL MODEL OF WZ-132.

ty
Errr... I don't see anything wrong with the WZ-132's model.

SteelRonin #58 Posted Jun 06 2013 - 21:40

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 21609 battles
  • 3,393
  • Member since:
    09-13-2010

View PostMotorizedPatriot, on Jun 06 2013 - 21:32, said:

Errr... I don't see anything wrong with the WZ-132's model.

look the tracks

MisterPatriot #59 Posted Jun 06 2013 - 22:03

    Major

  • Players
  • 17206 battles
  • 6,661
  • Member since:
    01-19-2011

View PostSteelRonin, on Jun 06 2013 - 21:40, said:

look the tracks
Yeah um, I don't see anything wrong.

KlepowEU #60 Posted Jun 07 2013 - 00:19

    Private

  • Players
  • 0 battles
  • 3
  • Member since:
    01-08-2013
@MotorizedPatriot
Man, I love u for this thread, finally after 1600 battles with my lovely Type it will get it's real size! Haha  :great:
(At least I hope so, ofc WG can still decide not to change it :<)





Also tagged with type 62, type, 62, historical

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users