Jump to content


Clan Wars Campaign General Info and FAQ

FAQ Campaign

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
583 replies to this topic

Quemapueblos #1 Posted Jun 20 2013 - 19:54

    Associate Producer

  • Administrator
  • 8238 battles
  • 550
  • [WGA-A] WGA-A
  • Member since:
    08-20-2012

Important Update: 7/29/13

All adjustments have been completed. M60's have begun to be handed out, and clans have received their gold from Victory Points.

Please be patient if you haven't received yours yet, it will be forthcoming.

Important Update: 7/22/13

The all important Victory Point to gold Conversion ratio is here!

Victory Points 5:1 Gold

Important Update: 7/19/13
Clan Wars Campaign: Stage III Winners!

Top 5:

1 SG Sturmgrenadier  595,000
1 -_- Enjoy  595,000
1   BT Blue Turret  595,000
2 NTR >Vidya Gaems  559,000
3 PUPEH Bow Wow Wow Yippie Yo Yippie Yea Brigade  529,000
3 KBEAR Kare Bears  529,000
3 SU Scrubs United 529,000
3 -J- Jaguars 529,000
4 NOVAC No Vacancy  523,000
4 REL_3 Relic Third Armoured  523,000
5 REL-2 Relic Second Armoured  487,000

[BT] Blue Turret, [-_-] Enjoy and [SG] Sturmgrenadier all tied for the top earner this round and receive the Iron Fist award for most Victory Points this round/

[3E] Triple Entente,[OTTER] Ottercratic Teutonic Theocrats of the Eternal Reich and [REL-2] Relic Second Armoured earns With Fire and Sword award for pacifying the largest number of Riots during Stage III.

Important Update: 7/15/13

Stage 4 Details have been posted! See the Stage 4 section below.

Important Update: 7/9/13

Clan Wars Campaign: Stage II Winners!

Top Clans from Stage II Rise and Fall:
[SKITT], the top Clan, receives the Magnate award for most Victory Points
[HAVOK] earns the Expulsion and Plunder award for receiving the largest amount of Gold via the ransack mechanism.

Top 5:

[SKITT] - Skittles 520,812
[_BAD_] - The Brotherhood Armored Division 502,128
[VOLT] - Revolt 480,206
[SIMP] - S.I.M.P. 467,208
[ANVIL] - Anvil 432,282

http://worldoftanks....tage-II-winners

Clan Wars Campaign General FAQ
(updated 7/15/13)
Spoiler                     
Clan Wars Campaign Stage 1 General Information
(updated 6/24/13)
Spoiler                     
Clan Wars Campaign Stage 1 FAQ
(updated 6/24/13)
Spoiler                     
Clan Wars Campaign Stage 2 General Information
(updated 6/27/13)
Spoiler                     
Clan Wars Campaign Stage 2 FAQ
(updated 6/25/13)
Spoiler                     
Clan Wars Campaign Stage 3 General Information
(updated 7/5/13)
Spoiler                     
Clan Wars Campaign Stage 3 FAQ
(updated 6/25/13)
Spoiler                     
Clan Wars Campaign Stage 4 General Information
(updated 7/19/13)
Spoiler                     
Clan Wars Campaign Stage 4 FAQ
(updated 7/5/13)
Spoiler                     

Edited by Hypnotik, Jul 29 2013 - 19:53.


_Ec1ipse #2 Posted Jun 20 2013 - 20:07

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 8384 battles
  • 195
  • Member since:
    07-29-2012
Thank you.

Superspeed007 #3 Posted Jun 20 2013 - 20:17

    Major

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 13072 battles
  • 3,208
  • [RELIC] RELIC
  • Member since:
    07-09-2010
Basically Top 30 with 10 battles and you are good....

Aquavolt #4 Posted Jun 20 2013 - 20:21

    Major

  • WGLNA Gold League Player
  • 12514 battles
  • 2,149
  • [BULBA] BULBA
  • Member since:
    08-04-2011

View PostSuperspeed007, on Jun 20 2013 - 20:17, said:

Basically Top 30 with 10 battles and you are good....

Pretty much, there's absolutely no reason any anybody needs to worry about getting 5 battles.

We're all getting our M60s at the same time anyways.

Superspeed007 #5 Posted Jun 20 2013 - 20:23

    Major

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 13072 battles
  • 3,208
  • [RELIC] RELIC
  • Member since:
    07-09-2010
Seems that way - way too stressful trying to get 500 battles spread over 100 people in a very short time frame, just use the full time to spread only double the battles for roughly 4x the amount of time to do so...

Aquavolt #6 Posted Jun 20 2013 - 20:25

    Major

  • WGLNA Gold League Player
  • 12514 battles
  • 2,149
  • [BULBA] BULBA
  • Member since:
    08-04-2011

View PostSuperspeed007, on Jun 20 2013 - 20:23, said:

way too stressful trying to get 500 battles spread over 100 people in a very short time frame

I'm sure myself and tons of other people learned that the hard way.

RatZ1LLa #7 Posted Jun 20 2013 - 21:24

    Captain

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 7948 battles
  • 1,431
  • [-G-] -G-
  • Member since:
    11-17-2012
Woah, this guy Q doing work son. Soon he'll learn to speak CR/D, and we can communicate.

Quemapueblos #8 Posted Jun 20 2013 - 22:40

    Associate Producer

  • Administrator
  • 8238 battles
  • 550
  • [WGA-A] WGA-A
  • Member since:
    08-20-2012
Hey I'm trying! As a former player I really want to do this right and keep some perspective, especially in light of the mix up just before I got here. But i've heard horror stories from CR/D and was told to stay away  :trollface:

JBWeld #9 Posted Jun 20 2013 - 23:52

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 14594 battles
  • 373
  • [RDDT] RDDT
  • Member since:
    03-15-2011
One question that's been bandied around a ton that I haven't seen an answer to, what will happen in the case of ties for top 5 spots?  The general assumption is that the bonus points from the tier 1 landings will be the tie breaker, so A) is that accurate, and B) what happens if teams are tied after those are applied as well?

Gatekeeper1 #10 Posted Jun 21 2013 - 00:23

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 12172 battles
  • 180
  • [TOONS] TOONS
  • Member since:
    06-04-2011
Thanks! Now maybe people stop asking the same question over and over...

Revelat0r #11 Posted Jun 21 2013 - 00:30

    Sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 9618 battles
  • 216
  • [SIMP] SIMP
  • Member since:
    07-19-2010
Question, I notice the word win/victory a lot do "defeats" still count toward battle count as well?

Hydrovindictus #12 Posted Jun 21 2013 - 00:53

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 9451 battles
  • 532
  • [REL-V] REL-V
  • Member since:
    09-07-2012
Thank you for the update sir.

TheLordOni #13 Posted Jun 21 2013 - 01:30

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 17291 battles
  • 145
  • [PZMOE] PZMOE
  • Member since:
    05-26-2012
My question would be:

If this style of tournament is held again with the same prize (I would assume this M60 will be a rare sight due to the fact that it will be OP, thus only available through this type of company-player interaction), will the clans that have already won the tank be kept out of future tournaments?

callmesarge #14 Posted Jun 21 2013 - 02:41

    First lieutenant

  • Community Contributor
  • 28330 battles
  • 539
  • [HAVOK] HAVOK
  • Member since:
    09-20-2010
If you finish in the Top 5 of a stage, will you be placed in the Top 30?

SilentDemise #15 Posted Jun 21 2013 - 03:00

    Staff sergeant

  • WGLNA Gold League Player
  • 40041 battles
  • 391
  • [SG] SG
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

View Postcallmesarge, on Jun 21 2013 - 02:41, said:

If you finish in the Top 5 of a stage, will you be placed in the Top 30?

No. If you place in the top 5 for a stage you get the M60 If you get in the top 30 at the end of the campaign you get a M60. Getting in the Top 5 of a stage does not guarantee top 30 but if you get top 5 of a stage you don't need to get top 30.

ed_anger #16 Posted Jun 21 2013 - 03:00

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 13820 battles
  • 7,605
  • [-G-] -G-
  • Member since:
    07-01-2010
Quemapueblos, a suggestion:

for a campaign like this make one unified thread with all of the info. first post will announce the campaign and contain information that applies to all stages. the next four posts are reserved for the info for each of the four stages when you release it. add in FAQs to the end of each pertinent post, general FAQ in the first post, FAQ for the first stage at the end of the next post etc.

any news posts all link back to this one thread, so all of the necessary info is in one place (which would be a massive improvement to hunting through the multiple threads and news articles that exist currently).

stagnate #17 Posted Jun 21 2013 - 06:15

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 25129 battles
  • 440
  • [-G-] -G-
  • Member since:
    07-17-2010
Good start. Please edit to clarify that it is the Canadian REGION, not Canada. There are plenty of provinces in Canada that are not in the canadian region.

2nd Eds comment also. One thread to rule them all.

B33PB33P #18 Posted Jun 21 2013 - 16:35

    First lieutenant

  • Council of Armored Forces
  • 20349 battles
  • 732
  • [OTTER] OTTER
  • Member since:
    03-01-2012
Thank you for the FAQ post.

In the future, please have this kind of information available and revealed to players
BEFORE
each stage, not during each stage / near the end of each stage.

SilentDemise #19 Posted Jun 21 2013 - 21:09

    Staff sergeant

  • WGLNA Gold League Player
  • 40041 battles
  • 391
  • [SG] SG
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011
Question if the overlapping region territories are considered part of Canada and supposed to be rising this phase why is Wood Buffalo going down?

Quemapueblos #20 Posted Jun 21 2013 - 22:21

    Associate Producer

  • Administrator
  • 8238 battles
  • 550
  • [WGA-A] WGA-A
  • Member since:
    08-20-2012

View PostSilentDemise, on Jun 21 2013 - 21:09, said:

Question if the overlapping region territories are considered part of Canada and supposed to be rising this phase why is Wood Buffalo going down?
So some eagle eyed folks noticed that the parts of Canada that are located on the United States Region Map are going down like they are part of the United States. To be clear and for the record, the US is NOT invading Canada. The actual mechanics are working correctly, but due to a design oversight (lack of vodka and geography courses) these provinces are considered part of the US. This is NOT how we intended it to work, so during the downtime between June 25th and 27th we will be calculating the missing points and credit the difference. We are sticking with the rules that were posted originally, but the Clan Wars Map is displaying the numbers incorrectly.