Jump to content


T-34-3/Type 59 comparison


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
35 replies to this topic

Hallivolve #1 Posted Jul 05 2013 - 18:08

    Major

  • Players
  • 13019 battles
  • 3,851
  • [-DTOM] -DTOM
  • Member since:
    02-01-2012
http://ftr.wot-news....50-8-7-changes/

The Type 59 data will be in brackets.
Crew: 4 (4)
Tier: 8 (8)
Health: 1300 (1300)
Weight: 32,8t (33,6t)
Hull armor: 90/50/50 (100/80/45) (armor nerf is probably the most important reason of the T-34-3 introduction)
Turret armor: 190/120/60 (200/130/60)
Turret rotation: 46 (46)
Viewrange: 380 (380)
Radiorange: 600 (600)
Price: 7500g (preliminary)
Gun:
122mm D-25TA (100mm Type 59)
Penetration: 175/300/61 (181/241/50) (well, T-34-3 gets the 300mm HEAT)
Damage: 390/390/465 (250/250/330)
ROF: 4,17 (6,9)
Accuracy: 0,46 (0,39)
Aimtime: 3,4 (2,9)
Ammo capacity: 40 (34)
Depression/Elevation: -3/+15 (0 when facing rear) (-7/+20)
Mobility:
Engine: identical, 520hp (12 percent fire chance)
Power-to-weight ratio: 15,85 hp/t (15,47 hp/t)
Speed: 50km/h, 20 reverse (56 km/h, 20 reverse)
Hull turnrate: 46/46
Identical terrain resistance (passability)
Track hitpoints: 200 (210)
Ammorack health: 180 (170)

Looks quite good. I might sell Super Pershing for it.

Hallivolve #2 Posted Jul 05 2013 - 18:15

    Major

  • Players
  • 13019 battles
  • 3,851
  • [-DTOM] -DTOM
  • Member since:
    02-01-2012
Why all the 1-? You mad?

another505 #3 Posted Jul 05 2013 - 18:19

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 12252 battles
  • 460
  • [5CAD] 5CAD
  • Member since:
    10-11-2010
the t59 somehow has -7 depression, while all other tanks of this design is -5 or -3.

Hallivolve #4 Posted Jul 05 2013 - 18:23

    Major

  • Players
  • 13019 battles
  • 3,851
  • [-DTOM] -DTOM
  • Member since:
    02-01-2012

View Postanother505, on Jul 05 2013 - 18:19, said:

the t59 somehow has -7 depression, while all other tanks of this design is -5 or -3.
Chinese gun depression is depressing.

Tupinambis #5 Posted Jul 05 2013 - 19:58

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 25787 battles
  • 11,269
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    12-22-2010

View PostBlackhawk874, on Jul 05 2013 - 18:23, said:

Chinese gun depression is depressing.

It is. People who buy this thing expecting it to be a Type 59 will be horribly disappointed and will do disastrously with it.

This tank is clearly only meant for people who are also using the standard high tier Chinese meds.

Nelson2011 #6 Posted Jul 06 2013 - 00:26

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 20921 battles
  • 361
  • [BULBA] BULBA
  • Member since:
    10-13-2011
Ill probably buy it... and I have a Type 59...

LurockTuroth #7 Posted Jul 06 2013 - 01:45

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 8460 battles
  • 69
  • [FLOT] FLOT
  • Member since:
    07-01-2012
Buying it and having a type is fine, but if you haven't driven the other Chinese meds tier 7 and up, don't expect it to be like any other med you have ever driven.

Nelson2011 #8 Posted Jul 06 2013 - 01:53

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 20921 battles
  • 361
  • [BULBA] BULBA
  • Member since:
    10-13-2011
Ha don't worry im getting my wz-120 soon... already unlocked it just waiting to see what's the next on track event

LurockTuroth #9 Posted Jul 06 2013 - 02:12

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 8460 battles
  • 69
  • [FLOT] FLOT
  • Member since:
    07-01-2012
40k away from my 120.....and a few mill creds...=(

Tupinambis #10 Posted Jul 06 2013 - 02:29

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 25787 battles
  • 11,269
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    12-22-2010

View PostNelson2011, on Jul 06 2013 - 01:53, said:

Ha don't worry im getting my wz-120 soon... already unlocked it just waiting to see what's the next on track event

Did you get it through the WZ-132 or the T-34-2?

If you've used the T-34-2 with the 122mm gun, you're golden. The T-34-3 is essentially a buffed version of that with credit-printing abilities and preferential MM [assumed].
The WZ-132 is... a different animal. Try the T-34-2 on the test server.

Hawk819 #11 Posted Jul 06 2013 - 02:33

    Captain

  • Beta Testers
  • 28691 battles
  • 1,192
  • [TEXAS] TEXAS
  • Member since:
    01-17-2011
If there's any truth to the Japanese Camouflage, then, all I can is: Hello, Walker Bulldog!

LurockTuroth #12 Posted Jul 06 2013 - 03:23

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 8460 battles
  • 69
  • [FLOT] FLOT
  • Member since:
    07-01-2012

View PostHawk819, on Jul 06 2013 - 02:33, said:

If there's any truth to the Japanese Camouflage, then, all I can is: Hello, Walker Bulldog!

.........wat?

Nelson2011 #13 Posted Jul 08 2013 - 03:27

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 20921 battles
  • 361
  • [BULBA] BULBA
  • Member since:
    10-13-2011

View PostTupinambis, on Jul 06 2013 - 02:29, said:

Did you get it through the WZ-132 or the T-34-2?

If you've used the T-34-2 with the 122mm gun, you're golden. The T-34-3 is essentially a buffed version of that with credit-printing abilities and preferential MM [assumed].
The WZ-132 is... a different animal. Try the T-34-2 on the test server.
I went through the wz-132 even tho I have the t-34-2 unlocked just haven't bought it yet..

Okinoshima #14 Posted Jul 09 2013 - 16:10

    Captain

  • Players
  • 16895 battles
  • 1,687
  • Member since:
    08-24-2012
I'm not sure I see the point to this when the 112 is coming in the same patch, it's the same gun but better in pretty much every other way.

1800_CHOKE_DAT_HOE #15 Posted Jul 09 2013 - 18:10

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 12064 battles
  • 64
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011

View PostNelson2011, on Jul 06 2013 - 00:26, said:

Ill probably buy it... and I have a Type 59...
yea i probably will too

Nelson2011 #16 Posted Jul 10 2013 - 05:26

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 20921 battles
  • 361
  • [BULBA] BULBA
  • Member since:
    10-13-2011

View PostOkinoshima, on Jul 09 2013 - 16:10, said:

I'm not sure I see the point to this when the 112 is coming in the same patch, it's the same gun but better in pretty much every other way.
Train your med crew if you don't have a type 59? Most people go down the med line on the Chinese line...

Tupinambis #17 Posted Jul 10 2013 - 06:31

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 25787 battles
  • 11,269
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    12-22-2010

View PostOkinoshima, on Jul 09 2013 - 16:10, said:

I'm not sure I see the point to this when the 112 is coming in the same patch, it's the same gun but better in pretty much every other way.

View PostNelson2011, on Jul 10 2013 - 05:26, said:

Train your med crew if you don't have a type 59? Most people go down the med line on the Chinese line...

While the 112 will have essentially double the gun depression of the T-34-3, and essentially double the armor effectiveness, I have a sinking suspicion that the 112 will have some hidden, crippling weaknesses like gun bloom while rotating its turret/hull, its module health, track friction, etc. Naturally the T-34-3 is also going to be considerably more mobile.

Nelson2011 #18 Posted Jul 10 2013 - 17:10

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 20921 battles
  • 361
  • [BULBA] BULBA
  • Member since:
    10-13-2011

View PostTupinambis, on Jul 10 2013 - 06:31, said:

While the 112 will have essentially double the gun depression of the T-34-3, and essentially double the armor effectiveness, I have a sinking suspicion that the 112 will have some hidden, crippling weaknesses like gun bloom while rotating its turret/hull, its module health, track friction, etc. Naturally the T-34-3 is also going to be considerably more mobile.
Look up the Engine Hit points for the 112 ouch...

storrmdemon #19 Posted Jul 13 2013 - 12:18

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 17544 battles
  • 257
  • Member since:
    07-20-2010
heheheehe interesting so this is there way of telling the ones that want thr 59 F*** off while still giving a tier 8 preme

also that gun is shit .46 acc

Type 59Master race still standing that be all

Wazzadakka94 #20 Posted Aug 02 2013 - 06:30

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 10404 battles
  • 481
  • Member since:
    02-25-2011

View PostBlackhawk874, on Jul 05 2013 - 18:08, said:

http://ftr.wot-news....50-8-7-changes/

The Type 59 data will be in brackets.
Crew: 4 (4)
Tier: 8 (8)
Health: 1300 (1300)
Weight: 32,8t (33,6t)
Hull armor: 90/50/50 (100/80/45) (armor nerf is probably the most important reason of the T-34-3 introduction)
Turret armor: 190/120/60 (200/130/60)
Turret rotation: 46 (46)
Viewrange: 380 (380)
Radiorange: 600 (600)
Price: 7500g (preliminary)
Gun:
122mm D-25TA (100mm Type 59)
Penetration: 175/300/61 (181/241/50) (well, T-34-3 gets the 300mm HEAT)
Damage: 390/390/465 (250/250/330)
ROF: 4,17 (6,9)
Accuracy: 0,46 (0,39)
Aimtime: 3,4 (2,9)
Ammo capacity: 40 (34)
Depression/Elevation: -3/+15 (0 when facing rear) (-7/+20)
Mobility:
Engine: identical, 520hp (12 percent fire chance)
Power-to-weight ratio: 15,85 hp/t (15,47 hp/t)
Speed: 50km/h, 20 reverse (56 km/h, 20 reverse)
Hull turnrate: 46/46
Identical terrain resistance (passability)
Track hitpoints: 200 (210)
Ammorack health: 180 (170)

Looks quite good. I might sell Super Pershing for it.

I would definitely do that! I am tired of my Super Pershing.