Jump to content


Let's figure out the ratio of support for Subversions

CWchanges subversion clanwars whyisWGdoingthis? whatdidwedowrong? isthisourfault? ImSoSorryForWhateverWeDid PleaseForgiveUs WeCanChange :(

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
131 replies to this topic

Poll: Subversions (912 members have cast votes)

Will CW be improved or harmed by the addition of Subversion mechanics?

  1. I think that overall, Subversions will be an improvement to the CW experience. (35 votes [3.84%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.84%

  2. I think that overall, Subversions affect everyone equally, and nothing will really change. (21 votes [2.30%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.30%

  3. I think that overall, Subversions will have a negative impact on the CW experience. (760 votes [83.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 83.33%

  4. I think that we can't really judge this until we see how it pans out and give the new mechanics a try. (96 votes [10.53%])

    Percentage of vote: 10.53%

Vote Hide poll

KingAlphyn #41 Posted Oct 13 2013 - 05:23

    Major

  • Players
  • 40195 battles
  • 3,612
  • [FATE2] FATE2
  • Member since:
    10-14-2011
Flint, this isn't the Flint Rags On Everyone For No Reason thread. You have to start that one up yourself.

flintcoin #42 Posted Oct 13 2013 - 05:44

    Major

  • Players
  • 43318 battles
  • 2,120
  • [BT] BT
  • Member since:
    05-22-2011

View PostKingAlphyn, on Oct 13 2013 - 05:23, said:

Flint, this isn't the Flint Rags On Everyone For No Reason thread. You have to start that one up yourself.
Too lazy to start the FROEFNR thread tonight.

KingAlphyn #43 Posted Oct 13 2013 - 06:01

    Major

  • Players
  • 40195 battles
  • 3,612
  • [FATE2] FATE2
  • Member since:
    10-14-2011
So far, the number in support of this new mechanic is holding steady at 1%.

Posted Image

Huck_ #44 Posted Oct 13 2013 - 06:51

    Major

  • Players
  • 34480 battles
  • 3,140
  • Member since:
    03-09-2011
Subversion is great. It allows for a clean break up between me and the game, instead of the last 6 months of half assed dating.

KingAlphyn #45 Posted Oct 13 2013 - 07:19

    Major

  • Players
  • 40195 battles
  • 3,612
  • [FATE2] FATE2
  • Member since:
    10-14-2011
More votes, more votes! If we can get this son of a cuss to four digits, then surely it must be properly noticed by WGNA.

Roadhardputawaywet #46 Posted Oct 13 2013 - 15:00

    Captain

  • Players
  • 496 battles
  • 1,393
  • [RHINO] RHINO
  • Member since:
    09-10-2011
VOTE

PrototypeRewired #47 Posted Oct 13 2013 - 16:36

    Major

  • Players
  • 13420 battles
  • 5,179
  • Member since:
    02-01-2012
Vote or die. ( Now on PC and Genesis! )

Roadhardputawaywet #48 Posted Oct 13 2013 - 18:17

    Captain

  • Players
  • 496 battles
  • 1,393
  • [RHINO] RHINO
  • Member since:
    09-10-2011
Boo

I_HAVE_BRAIN_DELAY #49 Posted Oct 13 2013 - 18:26

    Sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 19389 battles
  • 193
  • Member since:
    08-16-2010
You should allow us to see who voted, so those who voted for subversions can be properly dealt with.

Roadhardputawaywet #50 Posted Oct 13 2013 - 21:47

    Captain

  • Players
  • 496 battles
  • 1,393
  • [RHINO] RHINO
  • Member since:
    09-10-2011
Vote

joka111 #51 Posted Oct 13 2013 - 21:55

    Captain

  • Players
  • 11672 battles
  • 1,504
  • Member since:
    07-20-2011

View PostTheGoonswarm, on Oct 12 2013 - 02:37, said:

2 Members of ARMED/IOC have found this thread.

You didn't see me

lostwingman #52 Posted Oct 13 2013 - 22:07

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 22777 battles
  • 24,283
  • [PBKAC] PBKAC
  • Member since:
    01-11-2011

View PostZiddyCat, on Oct 12 2013 - 02:13, said:

It's simply a terrible set of "features", period.
I voted "don't know until we see it" but since our Kitteh-Chip Commissar says so it's probably true.

Roadhardputawaywet #53 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 03:04

    Captain

  • Players
  • 496 battles
  • 1,393
  • [RHINO] RHINO
  • Member since:
    09-10-2011
Vote

RedParadize #54 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 04:21

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 25277 battles
  • 809
  • Member since:
    01-04-2011
Even with 10 votes for and 1000 votes against, I don't think WG will back on this.
They will try it, and at best they will tweak it untill its marginal. Mainwhile we will
have to play with this "superb" new feature.

KingAlphyn #55 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 05:01

    Major

  • Players
  • 40195 battles
  • 3,612
  • [FATE2] FATE2
  • Member since:
    10-14-2011
I'll close the poll at 500, just so we have it as a handy reference.

RedParadize #56 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 06:13

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 25277 battles
  • 809
  • Member since:
    01-04-2011
naa let it open

SaigoTakamori #57 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 15:29

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 30009 battles
  • 167
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012
don't forget to vote.

Attached Files

  • Attached File   financial_downfall.jpg   61.78K


DUNDALK #58 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 15:50

    Major

  • Players
  • 56114 battles
  • 3,918
  • [SU] SU
  • Member since:
    05-08-2011
The so called "maintenance" has addd functionality for sabotage it appears. Quelle surprise.

tmoney20g #59 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 16:09

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 40544 battles
  • 592
  • Member since:
    12-14-2011
lol, currently you can also perform espionage on anyone on the map, doesn't matter how far away you are from them... of course there's no checkmark to make it true

Yankee #60 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 16:10

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 39334 battles
  • 9,950
  • [-G-] -G-
  • Member since:
    08-02-2010
that has always been the case tmoney




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users