Jump to content


Dear Hypnotik and Quemapablos


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
649 replies to this topic

DunxtonChexton #1 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 16:31

    Major

  • Players
  • 12082 battles
  • 3,231
  • Member since:
    05-29-2011

*
POPULAR

So I log onto the CW map page to see a new subversion button installed. I am curious you two, what part of "no" do you not understand?

http://forum.worldof...40#entry5715199

We, the CW community the subversion change effects, have weighed in. I get that GD was either too limp wristed to resist tank locking and riot implementation for fear of his job. Your tacit refusal to walk it back makes clear that those features were a blatant money-grab, however this is just asinine.

If you think that you know best and disregard the input of the clan leaders who are complicit in this Ponzi scheme, who have an interest in continued gameplay, then there will be consequences. You are making the enjoyable side of the Ponzi scheme impossible to play; 15v15s.

So, if when CW turns back on Subversions are enable, here is what I promise;
1. NASA will return, along with the blue and the space shuttle icon. Any clan who recognizes the harm involved with these changes is welcome to participate.

Failure to comply with our wishes will further result in:

2. Forcible hard partition of the CW map; I can load less than 30 clans on ALL of the map, and ensure that any other prospective clan gets boxed out.

Failure to comply with our wishes will result in:

3. Announcement of the next campaign winners, and explicitly rigging the campaign to that end.

Failure to comply with our wishes will result in:

4. Top-30 CW clan leadership defection to War Thunder, along with strong recommendation that our playerbase do the same. Long have we suffered your company's arrogant bumbling, and unfounded holier-than-thou attitude towards the CW leaders who have taken your shoddy game from a 6 month fad like BSG: Online into the quarter billion cash cow to fund SerB and GD's call girl addictions.

This is your corrective interview, this game is already too much of a time sink for leaders thanks to your actions, these features will break the Camel's back. I am quite sure your competitor would be more than happy to adopt our entire playerbase, loyalty, and business to give us the gaming experience we desire.

Your move.

Arty_Is_4_Degenerates #2 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 16:36

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 50819 battles
  • 435
  • Member since:
    04-09-2011
they'll realize it was a bad idea once it starts to hurt their pockets... why doesn't everyone stop spending money on this game to stop the new cw changes...easiest way to get them to listen to you......
Im rdy for BF4  :smile:

Edited by WAWps3, Oct 14 2013 - 16:53.


Timberwolf84 #3 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 16:39

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 20630 battles
  • 186
  • [_D_] _D_
  • Member since:
    04-05-2012
Well said!

What's the over under on actually getting a reply from them? And by reply I mean a response that actually shows they are listening to player feedback at all?

If this post gets a simple canned "we understand and are working on it" answer with no results I will be sad but not surprised.

Banish #4 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 16:40

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 17847 battles
  • 2,826
  • Member since:
    09-09-2011
Competitive gamers like fair fights and game balance. Competitive games hate RNG, as it negates teamwork and individual skill.

Wargaming said that they do not like that Clan Wars is dominated by the big clans. I hope you enjoy NASA 2.0.

gg was close o7o7o7o7o7o7o7o7o7o7o7o7o7o7o7

tmoney20g #5 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 16:40

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 40544 battles
  • 592
  • Member since:
    12-14-2011
I approve this message

kittikat #6 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 16:42

    Major

  • Players
  • 8147 battles
  • 8,669
  • [BADGR] BADGR
  • Member since:
    12-09-2012
Taking preemptive applications for crew on my Retaliator Heavy Bomber.

Only have 7 slots left.

100,000 United Earth Credits due upon signing.

DunxtonChexton #7 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 16:45

    Major

  • Players
  • 12082 battles
  • 3,231
  • Member since:
    05-29-2011
And before anyone says NA CW map is stale, we have five power blocs that are mostly at odds with each other, and unlike the EU or RU maps, we have deep seated personality incompatibilities which will force at least one major war on the map at any given time. If WG would stop raping our activities every six months you would see more of the US map on fire than currently is the case.

S7rike #8 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 16:45

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 20304 battles
  • 851
  • [BT] BT
  • Member since:
    06-18-2011
Posted Image

Alcoholism #9 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 16:47

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 18036 battles
  • 177
  • Member since:
    06-02-2011
Also allow us to give more upvotes, this post deserves it!
Also as stated in my sig, REMOVE WARGAMING FROM THE GAME

Edited by Maxxjager, Oct 14 2013 - 16:49.


Mayhem1 #10 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 16:47

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 35956 battles
  • 698
  • [MISC] MISC
  • Member since:
    10-07-2010
What he ^ said...

Abject_McDeath #11 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 16:48

    Major

  • Players
  • 27334 battles
  • 4,123
  • [SPIDY] SPIDY
  • Member since:
    03-26-2012
Wu Tang Fo' Eva'

Behind_the_Shadows #12 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 16:52

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 48483 battles
  • 451
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011
NASA2013, lets do eet.

Grinch1 #13 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 16:56

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 50749 battles
  • 407
  • [W--W] W--W
  • Member since:
    09-30-2011
+1,  100% agreed.

kingtut11 #14 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 16:58

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 15370 battles
  • 78
  • [NDP] NDP
  • Member since:
    06-10-2011
NASA > Subversion by far. I'm looking forward to show the small clans in support of this how b.s clanwars can really be.

DUNDALK #15 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 16:59

    Major

  • Players
  • 56114 battles
  • 3,918
  • [SU] SU
  • Member since:
    05-08-2011
My year long subscription expires this week.

how terrible.

SU will be participating in the subversion boycott.

Guest_B0B_Ross_* #16 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 17:02

  • Guest

View PostDUNDALK, on Oct 14 2013 - 16:59, said:

My year long subscription expires this week.how terrible.SU will be participating in the subversion boycott.

u bought a year, what a sucker.  I have been teetering on going un prem for such a long time that monthly seems like a waste to me.  Can I get a 1 day prem ftw?

doggsoldier #17 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 17:05

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 47682 battles
  • 233
  • [PDL] PDL
  • Member since:
    07-22-2011
take yourself a LITTLE over serious..... "I" will do this and that...rofl

PrototypeRewired #18 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 17:06

    Major

  • Players
  • 13420 battles
  • 5,179
  • Member since:
    02-01-2012
Will speak with the guys in charge of HT.

Have to get an official statement before I put one out.

Edited by PrototypePegasus, Oct 14 2013 - 17:07.


semiorange #19 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 17:10

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 18758 battles
  • 314
  • [BADGR] BADGR
  • Member since:
    03-16-2012
After taking a nice 10 day break and being here for clan wars only this might end my stay here as well. GG wg

TopShot_Adam #20 Posted Oct 14 2013 - 17:13

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 18701 battles
  • 83
  • [W--W] W--W
  • Member since:
    02-26-2012
YES - on board for player based retaliation with WGA forcing yet another unwanted and unnecessary meta upon us.  Consequences Coming Soon™




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users