Jump to content


Japanese Super Heavy Tank

japanese japan heavytank

  • Please log in to reply
28 replies to this topic

Spartann #21 Posted Dec 15 2013 - 06:01

    Corporal

  • Beta Testers
  • 24525 battles
  • 33
  • [DV] DV
  • Member since:
    12-22-2010
Looks like the ancestor to the warhammer 40k's BaneBlade  http://www.games-wor...Id=prod2130074a

DracoArgentum #22 Posted Dec 15 2013 - 09:45

    Major

  • Players
  • 14673 battles
  • 3,033
  • [IOC] IOC
  • Member since:
    09-25-2011

View PostDaigensui, on Dec 15 2013 - 05:04, said:

I'll be nice: Mind not posting the same old misinformed things when people who actually do research for WG are around?

 

 

Thats nice in the same sense that Obama is a socialist. Nice would be linking to the Japanese threads with a message such as "We already did a bunch of research on Japanese tanks."



SilentKiller_95 #23 Posted Jan 13 2014 - 02:31

    Private

  • Players
  • 13835 battles
  • 8
  • Member since:
    03-02-2013

guys you should check out this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Japanese_armoured_fighting_vehicles_of_World_War_II

 

WG should add their tank destroyer line and spg line also some tanks that they did not add.



Legiondude #24 Posted Jan 13 2014 - 03:39

    Major

  • Players
  • 20458 battles
  • 23,185
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    08-22-2011

View PostSilentKiller_95, on Jan 12 2014 - 19:31, said:

guys you should check out this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Japanese_armoured_fighting_vehicles_of_World_War_II

 

WG should add their tank destroyer line and spg line also some tanks that they did not add.

Hey, since we're talking about crap that's already in the pipeline for release and didn't need to be brought up, let's talk about the Firefly



ProeS_ #25 Posted Jan 13 2014 - 03:42

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 7084 battles
  • 507
  • [-ESG-] -ESG-
  • Member since:
    02-10-2013
Another TOG? Oh god...

VioletZer0 #26 Posted Jan 13 2014 - 05:25

    Major

  • Players
  • 3268 battles
  • 2,483
  • Member since:
    03-27-2011

Huh. I WONDER WHERE THE WEAKSPOTS ARE

 

There is no way a superheavy like this can be practical in WoT context. Especially not at tier X. 



furydog44 #27 Posted Jan 13 2014 - 06:13

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 4740 battles
  • 239
  • Member since:
    07-20-2011
Ah the good ol O-I. Equipped with a powerful 105mm over 200mm of armour, slow as hell, had rockets and flamethrowers. I believe only one was made or partially made.

WulfeHound #28 Posted Jan 13 2014 - 06:31

    Major

  • Players
  • 12905 battles
  • 26,179
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    04-03-2011

View PostBuffalo444, on Dec 14 2013 - 22:58, said:

 

Less armor than a T28, lots of weakspots, the 105 doesn't have to be a tier 10 gun (could be though, look at the T34), top speed is probably downhill and extremely optimistic, would probably have manuevrability close to that of a TOG II*. Not to mention it is boxy as hell, so the 200mm isn't angled at all...

The T34 Heavy has a 120mm.



pepe_trueno #29 Posted Jan 13 2014 - 17:05

    Major

  • Players
  • 41234 battles
  • 6,367
  • Member since:
    05-21-2011

t10?, i will go with t8 at best.

-

mauss armor >>> o-i armor (r2d2 *2 yay)

maus gun > o-i gun

maus speed < o-i speed (is a dual 550 so it has a bit better weight/hp relation)

-

looks more like a kv-4 on crack that has "better" armor but worst gun, for those who wonder why i put those "" around better is becouse those miniturrets and that lower plate flat armor look dam weak.  







Also tagged with japanese, japan, heavytank

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users