Jump to content


Clan Spotlight: BADGR 4/28/14

ClanSpotlight BADGR

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
117 replies to this topic

GarlicFries_CashCarti #21 Posted Apr 28 2014 - 23:56

    Major

  • Players
  • 22995 battles
  • 2,912
  • [99986] 99986
  • Member since:
    01-26-2013


Primelaw #22 Posted Apr 28 2014 - 23:56

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 20848 battles
  • 928
  • [PANSY] PANSY
  • Member since:
    07-27-2011

View PostVanagandr, on Apr 28 2014 - 18:48, said:

"RIP"

I blame Hellsau



Scrublet #23 Posted Apr 29 2014 - 00:01

    Captain

  • Players
  • 30618 battles
  • 1,472
  • Member since:
    02-18-2013


stnyrprde #24 Posted Apr 29 2014 - 00:03

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 15739 battles
  • 137
  • Member since:
    08-07-2011
If a PBKAC company sees you Wednesday, get ready for a "Stand down or else!" so we can get free gold.

johnmadara #25 Posted Apr 29 2014 - 00:18

    Major

  • Players
  • 31504 battles
  • 5,903
  • Member since:
    10-09-2011
Awww BUNEH still not recognized as Associated Clans sniffle...

TheCobraChicken #26 Posted Apr 29 2014 - 00:33

    Major

  • Players
  • 46169 battles
  • 4,058
  • [STRNG] STRNG
  • Member since:
    03-06-2012

View Postjohnmadara, on Apr 29 2014 - 00:18, said:

Awww BUNEH still not recognized as Associated Clans sniffle...

 

This would follow on the dis-association of BUNEH following some terrible mistakes. Namely BUNEH itself.

 

FOXEY so proud, its kids all getting the spotlight. 

 

Can confirm, Wandorf has sechsy voice and private channel for quiet times. 



nrage23 #27 Posted Apr 29 2014 - 00:39

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 21869 battles
  • 954
  • [TYR] TYR
  • Member since:
    04-26-2012

Congrats furry friends.  

 

PS. Q is terrible. 



GrannyW #28 Posted Apr 29 2014 - 00:46

    Major

  • Players
  • 20060 battles
  • 5,724
  • [OTT-V] OTT-V
  • Member since:
    04-03-2011

View PostScorpion_King, on Apr 28 2014 - 17:08, said:

OMG Vanagandr Said my name. He still loves me. I know it. Deeply inside. He does.


 How deep? Inquiring minds want to know.

 

 

Oh, and GRATZ BADGR!



josif90 #29 Posted Apr 29 2014 - 01:53

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 90319 battles
  • 321
  • [-TIC-] -TIC-
  • Member since:
    06-18-2011

Nice to see someone talking about teamwork, anybody would think WOT was a team game!

Odd that people that have played a lot think WOT stats are not [edited].

With MM controlling the winrate the main meaningful stat is position in team by XP, And that is the one that is not available. Could it be because there is no correlation between team rank and win rate (I've checked!). This kind of gives the game away.

Interesting interview BADGR, maybe see you Thursday morning if I can find a decent company to join.

coat1 #30 Posted Apr 29 2014 - 02:15

    Major

  • Players
  • 20195 battles
  • 2,104
  • [GSKYO] GSKYO
  • Member since:
    04-20-2011
Congrads BADGR o7 brahs 

Scorpion_King #31 Posted Apr 29 2014 - 02:28

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 25513 battles
  • 469
  • Member since:
    04-19-2011

View PostGrannyW, on Apr 28 2014 - 23:46, said:


 How deep? Inquiring minds want to know.

 

 

Oh, and GRATZ BADGR!

 

Pretty deep, not that deep do. Kinda in between the middle from very deep and not deep at all.



SirVex #32 Posted Apr 29 2014 - 02:58

    Captain

  • Players
  • 44508 battles
  • 1,010
  • [THUGZ] THUGZ
  • Member since:
    02-24-2011
Congratz on the spotlight 07 Badger

TheGreenTank #33 Posted Apr 29 2014 - 03:04

    Major

  • Players
  • 23380 battles
  • 2,900
  • [MEMES] MEMES
  • Member since:
    04-27-2011


Allu_o7o7o7 #34 Posted Apr 29 2014 - 03:05

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 20477 battles
  • 6,207
  • Member since:
    08-22-2011
Big brothers advice: Don't let NYC get sacked.

Vanagandr #35 Posted Apr 29 2014 - 04:01

    Major

  • Players
  • 25407 battles
  • 3,622
  • [-G-] -G-
  • Member since:
    04-22-2011

View PostScorpion_King, on Apr 28 2014 - 20:28, said:

Pretty deep, not that deep do. Kinda in between the middle from very deep and not deep at all.

What you mean is intercourse



JulieBeth #36 Posted Apr 29 2014 - 04:02

    Captain

  • Players
  • 12860 battles
  • 1,452
  • [OTT-V] OTT-V
  • Member since:
    06-27-2012
See you fellers in absolutes! <3

Galaxybane #37 Posted Apr 29 2014 - 04:48

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 27014 battles
  • 65
  • Member since:
    10-29-2011
o7 semiorange, and nice shoutout to GSA... good times. Never knew the purple guys could come alongside GSA one day, lol.

HideYourKids #38 Posted Apr 29 2014 - 04:50

    Sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 27222 battles
  • 241
  • [GRIMY] GRIMY
  • Member since:
    12-06-2010

Da heck. No idea what BADGR is up to now. After just not playing for a few days.

 

Then again I never have any idea what this clan is up to. How terrible.



bjshnog #39 Posted Apr 29 2014 - 05:10

    Major

  • Players
  • 18386 battles
  • 2,567
  • [LABS] LABS
  • Member since:
    07-13-2011

View PostHypnotik, on Apr 29 2014 - 04:17, said:

What do you think clans typically should pay more attention to that they often don't, or how to get high quality new members into a new clan?

 

Well... I'm afraid that just isn't true. In the vast majority of cases (virtually all relevant cases), recent WN8 + recent WR is a lot more informative and useful than overall stats. Look at my Obj. 140 stats, for example. It shows <2500 DPG, but I can do 2900-3000 regularly, and that's because about 2000 battles ago, my performance significantly jumped, and I've been doing the same in almost every high tier tank since. And in my E100. It shows ~2750 DPG, but I can do 3200 in it, or upwards of 3500, consistently, while in a good platoon. My recent WN8 has fallen a bit lately due to getting used to a new play style (French autoloading heavies), and that shows that I'm not quite as good in those as I am in the Obj. 140 or E100, yet. (I won't blame it on the no-skill crew.) But if you look at my recent history, you'll see that my recent (last 1k) WN8 was over or around 3000 for at least 2 weeks, and started slowly falling when I got the AMX 50 120. One thing that confirmed that I had improved was that I played some tier 8 tanks and did significantly better than I had in the past. It wasn't just a lucky streak.

 

With all this said, though, if you only look at overall stats, you really aren't looking at the player's present level of performance. That is why a lot of pubbies underestimate me.

 

(hoping that nested quote box is valid)



blackzaru #40 Posted Apr 29 2014 - 05:19

    Major

  • Players
  • 20579 battles
  • 3,732
  • [DCU] DCU
  • Member since:
    03-07-2011

Gratz on the spotlight!

 







Also tagged with ClanSpotlight, BADGR

2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users