Jump to content


Warpack mod


  • Please log in to reply
128 replies to this topic

Apache1990 #41 Posted May 10 2014 - 23:01

    Major

  • Players
  • 35570 battles
  • 6,960
  • Member since:
    06-16-2011

View PostBeakedplace, on May 10 2014 - 15:40, said:

Perfect time to point out there is no anti cheat  for this game.

 

If anyone has / does .....ect .. there is nothing to be done about it.  I've been shot once by a guy using WP.. Foch (41% player ) aimed his gun  as high as it  would go and penned the top of my  e5 while I  was behind  a building debris

 

 He was 50m away , I  was lit , he was lit.....Wondered wth is he was doing then BLAM. I can only assume it was WP arty /sniper mod. Was by far the most  baffling shot I've ever  seen.

 

 

This is called aiming at the MG cupola.  A Foch is incapable of elevating the gun high enough to fire indirectly at 50m.



Husarski #42 Posted May 10 2014 - 23:18

    Major

  • Players
  • 34794 battles
  • 4,006
  • Member since:
    05-13-2011
Yep, some people don't know spotting mechanics.. been called a hacker plenty of times.

Rides_with_Death #43 Posted May 11 2014 - 01:27

    Major

  • Players
  • 35306 battles
  • 2,482
  • [F0CUS] F0CUS
  • Member since:
    05-02-2011
Everyone knows warpack only works on the type 59... Duh...  

Nato101 #44 Posted May 11 2014 - 02:43

    Major

  • Players
  • 21101 battles
  • 2,211
  • [AJ] AJ
  • Member since:
    07-09-2011

View PostLapdog1, on May 10 2014 - 22:34, said:

Was a time they would remove threads containing this title. Im seeing so many lately im begining to wonder if they are actually an underhanded attempt at advertising.


Might be because I had a month long battle with them via support after leaving a smart remark about WP, after which this was the outcome: Basically I made the point that nowhere in their EULA, nor forum rules, is there a clause preventing one from mentioning a mod, whether or not it's allowed ingame. They removed my warning points. But left my post censored as they felt that it promoted use. Probably because my statement was true.

"After carefully reviewing your case I have decided to deduct 3 warning points from your forum account.

While discussion about WARPACK is not tolerated, I feel this should have been an educational warning instead.

Please keep in mind that the statement "Most people run WARPACK. Because WG doesn't do anything to stop them." can encourage players to attempt using Warpack and we will not be reinstating the post."



Clearly_Hacking #45 Posted May 11 2014 - 03:20

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 31180 battles
  • 462
  • Member since:
    02-15-2013

View Postapache1990, on May 10 2014 - 18:01, said:

 

This is called aiming at the MG cupola.  A Foch is incapable of elevating the gun high enough to fire indirectly at 50m.


 The top ........ of my  turret...... not the MG nest / cupola.

 

 Perhaps read what  I  say  next  time ? I  said it was the MOST BAFFLING shot I  have ever  received in WoT.



Apache1990 #46 Posted May 11 2014 - 03:49

    Major

  • Players
  • 35570 battles
  • 6,960
  • Member since:
    06-16-2011

View PostBeakedplace, on May 10 2014 - 22:20, said:


 The top ........ of my  turret...... not the MG nest / cupola.

 

 Perhaps read what  I  say  next  time ? I  said it was the MOST BAFFLING shot I  have ever  received in WoT.

 

View Postapache1990, on May 10 2014 - 18:01, said:

 

A Foch is incapable of elevating the gun high enough to fire indirectly at 50m.



Clearly_Hacking #47 Posted May 11 2014 - 04:13

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 31180 battles
  • 462
  • Member since:
    02-15-2013

View Postapache1990, on May 10 2014 - 18:01, said:

 

  A Foch is incapable of elevating the gun high enough to fire indirectly at 50m.

 

 

That is the entire point I was trying to make ............ top of my Turret..... Debris  in the way...... a Top Down Hit ...... on my Turret

 

 Not sure how many more times I  can spell it slowly.



Apache1990 #48 Posted May 11 2014 - 04:27

    Major

  • Players
  • 35570 battles
  • 6,960
  • Member since:
    06-16-2011
The obvious answer is that he didn't do it.  Also the generic "replay or it didn't happen" blah blah etc.

Clearly_Hacking #49 Posted May 11 2014 - 04:38

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 31180 battles
  • 462
  • Member since:
    02-15-2013

View Postapache1990, on May 10 2014 - 23:27, said:

The obvious answer is that he didn't do it.  Also the generic "replay or it didn't happen" blah blah etc.


 Knew you'd say ..But since you've been nothing but a thorn perhaps go read up on the Mod people are posting about in this thread and educate yourself.

 

 There is no amount of explaining for some people , and I  believe you are one of those . Please remind me again what  Anti cheat  WG has ? Oh that's right... there isn't one.



Apache1990 #50 Posted May 11 2014 - 04:46

    Major

  • Players
  • 35570 battles
  • 6,960
  • Member since:
    06-16-2011
That mod can't make impossible shots possible.  It can convert auto-aim into a proper aimbot with leading and proper weak spot positioning, but it can't make a gun fire in a direction that it can't face.  Artillery view doesn't circumvent normal aiming rules, or people would complain about artillery a LOT more than they do now.

fsjd #51 Posted May 11 2014 - 04:52

    Major

  • Players
  • 10559 battles
  • 5,248
  • [TT] TT
  • Member since:
    02-26-2011

View PostSpectrumpigg, on May 10 2014 - 14:43, said:

From what I hear is that warpack doesn't do all the things it says it does. Mostly it's used for credit/debit card fraud. So take that as you will.

 yup. bonus points for conspiracy talk.

View PostDogbeast, on May 10 2014 - 15:10, said:

What is warpack?

 

Is it a cheat code?

 WP is a collection of mods, most of them illegal, some downright impossible.

 

some of the thing it says it does are impossible w/o hacking the servers or data stream, and that is a LOT harder than client-side stuff.

 

and its really just a scam to get your money before you get banhammered by WG

 



Clearly_Hacking #52 Posted May 11 2014 - 04:54

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 31180 battles
  • 462
  • Member since:
    02-15-2013

View Postapache1990, on May 10 2014 - 23:46, said:

That mod can't make impossible shots possible.  It can convert auto-aim into a proper aimbot with leading and proper weak spot positioning, but it can't make a gun fire in a direction that it can't face.  Artillery view doesn't circumvent normal aiming rules, or people would complain about artillery a LOT more than they do now.

 

 

 Can you  confirm this 100%? No , you  cant..... because you do not know what  mods / modders are able to  do  edit / change or bypass with or with out mods.



Apache1990 #53 Posted May 11 2014 - 05:06

    Major

  • Players
  • 35570 battles
  • 6,960
  • Member since:
    06-16-2011
I can, because all shot calculations are done server side (which is why guns sometimes decide to shoot sideways for no apparent reason: the sync between where you are aimed on the server vs. client got screwed up in between).

Lefteye #54 Posted May 11 2014 - 05:48

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 18353 battles
  • 557
  • Member since:
    03-07-2012

View Postmap381, on May 10 2014 - 15:29, said:


Nah, we just need to ban people who wear tinfoil.


/me takes off his tin foil hat and puts onhis wizard hat and robe ...



HighPitch #55 Posted May 11 2014 - 06:36

    Major

  • Players
  • 43469 battles
  • 7,654
  • [SIMP] SIMP
  • Member since:
    05-24-2011

View Postmustangman6579, on May 10 2014 - 06:45, said:

By other side of the map, i mean I'm in the 2 line, and he's in the 0 line. 

Replay?



and_den #56 Posted May 11 2014 - 07:23

    Captain

  • Players
  • 29532 battles
  • 1,507
  • Member since:
    04-09-2012

It never seems to amaze me that the level of intelligence of the player base in this game continues to drop.

 

Players think that driving a higher tier vehicle will "magically" make them a better player - so they free EXP that vehicle and be better!

Players think that XVM is a hack and should be banned.

Players think there is no way a tank can shoot me because i'm invincible over here!

 

Seriously, if for one moment players used their heads this game would be so much better.  Alas, we're stuck with the players

that think everyone else is the problem and they are doing it right.. nevermind that 300WN8 and 44% winrate.. because its all luck!

Perhaps there should be a skill chart and players are restricted from those tiers until they meet the criteria.

0000-0100 WN8 Tier 1

0200-0300 WN8 Tier 2

0400-0500 WN8 Tier 3

0600-0700 WN8 Tier 4

0800-0900 WN8 Tier 5

1000-1100 WN8 Tier 6

1200-1300 WN8 Tier 7

1400-1500 WN8 Tier 8

1600-1700 WN8 Tier 9

1800-2000 WN8 Tier 10

 

 

 



Xenuex_ #57 Posted May 11 2014 - 07:32

    Major

  • Players
  • 38179 battles
  • 5,093
  • [TL-DR] TL-DR
  • Member since:
    04-15-2012

View Postand_den, on May 10 2014 - 23:23, said:

It never seems to amaze me that the level of intelligence of the player base in this game continues to drop.

 

Players think that driving a higher tier vehicle will "magically" make them a better player - so they free EXP that vehicle and be better!

Players think that XVM is a hack and should be banned.

Players think there is no way a tank can shoot me because i'm invincible over here!

 

Seriously, if for one moment players used their heads this game would be so much better.  Alas, we're stuck with the players

that think everyone else is the problem and they are doing it right.. nevermind that 300WN8 and 44% winrate.. because its all luck!

Perhaps there should be a skill chart and players are restricted from those tiers until they meet the criteria.

0000-0100 WN8 Tier 1

0200-0300 WN8 Tier 2

0400-0500 WN8 Tier 3

0600-0700 WN8 Tier 4

0800-0900 WN8 Tier 5

1000-1100 WN8 Tier 6

1200-1300 WN8 Tier 7

1400-1500 WN8 Tier 8

1600-1700 WN8 Tier 9

1800-2000 WN8 Tier 10

 

I agree to a point. I think it should be a bit more simplified. So, you are saying I shouldn't be able to play in tier 10s cuz I am not 1800++? Even when I carry most of my wins?

 

1000 and below should stay below tier 7. 1001 and above should be able to get up to tier 10s.

 

keep it simple. anyone with 1k++ wn8 is capable of carrying their own weight.



mustangman6579 #58 Posted May 11 2014 - 08:24

    Major

  • Players
  • 21539 battles
  • 6,444
  • [RID] RID
  • Member since:
    07-02-2011

View PostXenuex, on May 10 2014 - 23:32, said:

 

I agree to a point. I think it should be a bit more simplified. So, you are saying I shouldn't be able to play in tier 10s cuz I am not 1800++? Even when I carry most of my wins?

 

1000 and below should stay below tier 7. 1001 and above should be able to get up to tier 10s.

 

keep it simple. anyone with 1k++ wn8 is capable of carrying their own weight.

I have to agree 1800 for t10 is a little high. 



Tolos #59 Posted May 11 2014 - 11:21

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 25997 battles
  • 18,534
  • [GDF] GDF
  • Member since:
    09-22-2010

View PostBrianHorrocks, on May 10 2014 - 18:02, said:

 

the stupidity and assumptions are just mind boggling sometimes:

 

1. Your so called "correction" inserted a player's name into the conversation that the OP had not used and your direct accusation that he had was both false and provocative.

 

2. You drew the "implication" that you are using warpack from my comments. I made no such accusation but that you drew that "implication" (ie: [edited]/umption) is quite telling of your viewpoint indeed. 

 

3. I would agree with your last statement as reflective of your contributions here.  I would hope that you are not normally this quick to kneejerk into false assumptions, make fictional connections and read in players' names who really have no relation to the subject of this thread.  

 

If you really think the player you mentioned has committed actions that you think are relevant to the topic, please feel free to share and ofc, post some damn proof before invoking a player's name like that again. 

 

edit: especially someone who has a modpack of their own that they are gracious enough to share with the community at no cost.

 

 

Thank you for proving my point better than I ever could. 



commo81 #60 Posted Dec 14 2014 - 04:48

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 19715 battles
  • 218
  • [824TH] 824TH
  • Member since:
    10-08-2011

View Postmustangman6579, on May 10 2014 - 05:45, said:

Is there a way for players to positively tell when another player is using this?

We can't all report every player we come across for cheats when we have no clue. 

 

I ask because today in one of my matches, i swear an SU-122-44 was using it. He was on the other side of the map, and dropping shots in between these 2 hills trying to hit me and 2 other tanks. By other side of the map, i mean I'm in the 2 line, and he's in the 0 line. 

 

There is a way if you write your own modpack and write your code to detect certain hacks, aimbots, etc. My modpack detects the illegal mods such as the warpack mod. Sry, I don't share. WG supposedly was supposed to implement something in the game to detect illegal mods....have yet to see it.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users