Jump to content


Sketchup Redevelopment Tanks


  • Please log in to reply
4028 replies to this topic

Giganaut #21 Posted Jun 21 2011 - 09:10

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 10534 battles
  • 2,962
  • Member since:
    07-17-2010
2nd development of the tank

Posted Image
Posted Image

Giganaut #22 Posted Jun 21 2011 - 18:23

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 10534 battles
  • 2,962
  • Member since:
    07-17-2010
3rd development underway

Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image

Kazunemaru #23 Posted Jun 21 2011 - 18:49

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 11172 battles
  • 233
  • Member since:
    03-19-2011
Wow. I like. Certainly looks like a U.S. heavy; well done.  

I'm curious about what about an armored skirt version would look like.

Giganaut #24 Posted Jun 21 2011 - 19:01

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 10534 battles
  • 2,962
  • Member since:
    07-17-2010

View PostKazunemaru, on Jun 21 2011 - 18:49, said:

Wow. I like. Certainly looks like a U.S. heavy; well done.  

I'm curious about what about an armored skirt version would look like.

i'll be adding that later, or using steel plates and thanks!

Punisher_1 #25 Posted Jun 21 2011 - 20:18

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 3479 battles
  • 818
  • [TB] TB
  • Member since:
    07-04-2010

View PostDatpony, on Jun 06 2011 - 12:47, said:

Realistically, a 50mm Gatling gun would be absolutely useless against another heavy tank. Heck, all i see is a rapid-fire bounce machine lol. Or a rapid fire "Critical hit! But no damage done" machine in the case of HE.

I'd use it though. Post more on that Gatling gun. I MUST KNOW MOAR!


Well no not really, not every thing on a tank is behind multiple inches of steel and spall liner. Hit by AP and HE rounds would shatter periscopes, damage tracks and road wheels, catch engines on fire buy hitting external fuel tanks and also the damage through engine vents, Also destroying the main gun. a blind, tracked and gunless tank on shatterd tracks is pretty useless.

It's all about the game mechanics if WoT Devs added them its would be a great weapon to use after all in history there were large naval gatling guns.

http://www.navweaps....m_Hotchkiss.htm

Also the several experimental and combat used rapid fire or auto loading dual or quad gun set ups.

Edit: Giganaut most excellent work by the way!  +1

Giganaut #26 Posted Jun 22 2011 - 06:27

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 10534 battles
  • 2,962
  • Member since:
    07-17-2010
done for now. will add more stuff to it later

http://d.facdn.net/a...ost_process.jpg

http://d.facdn.net/a...ost_process.jpg

here are the list of changes and additions

further reworked engine bay
added "armored cone" to cover exposed turret ring
track pads added
added coaxial machine gun
basic (shitty looking) camo net roll
reworked gas tanks
Side steel skirts
added commander's horseshoe antenna
rear RPG cage
WW2 US armored tank Insignia
headlight guard rails
reworked track wheels
other small fixes and additions

Giganaut #27 Posted Jun 22 2011 - 13:28

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 10534 battles
  • 2,962
  • Member since:
    07-17-2010
you know when you have that feeling...

when an undetected Tiger IV with a 210mm POOT gun is going to derp you to death with one shot, and the exposed tiger is the bait...

UI shopped into pic is © to World of tanks

Tank models © Giganaut (me)



Posted Image

Darno #28 Posted Jun 22 2011 - 13:41

    Corporal

  • Beta Testers
  • 6441 battles
  • 76
  • Member since:
    01-25-2011
Well, I have two sketches that I did on Paint.NET, but the sketches are only done by side. And they're Japanese tanks, possibly from the O-I series. :P

Anyway, HOLY CRAP. I bet you're a tank designer. The E-89 looks bad ass.
EDIT: Anyway, those sketches are real radical, something that you wouldn't see it on WWII, but I guess it's worth a try. :Smile-hiding:

Attached Files

  • Attached File   Chisake.png   63.08K


Giganaut #29 Posted Jun 22 2011 - 14:14

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 10534 battles
  • 2,962
  • Member since:
    07-17-2010

View PostDarno, on Jun 22 2011 - 13:41, said:

Well, I have two sketches that I did on Paint.NET, but the sketches are only done by side. And they're Japanese tanks, possibly from the O-I series. :P

Anyway, HOLY CRAP. I bet you're a tank designer. The E-89 looks bad ass.
EDIT: Anyway, those sketches are real radical, something that you wouldn't see it on WWII, but I guess it's worth a try. :Smile-hiding:


aww~ your too kind~ X3

and thanks, i am but only a tank designer in heart~

lol bubble tanks! never stop developing them!

FreedomFighterEx #30 Posted Jun 22 2011 - 18:49

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 2913 battles
  • 448
  • Member since:
    03-24-2011

View PostGiganaut, on Jun 02 2011 - 00:27, said:

on it and 4 exhaust ports? = 2 engines XD

4 look stupid if you ask me, what about big 2 exhaust pipe instead?
big pipe = big smoke

now imagine if German manage to build this in WWII  :o

Giganaut #31 Posted Jun 22 2011 - 23:23

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 10534 battles
  • 2,962
  • Member since:
    07-17-2010

View PostFreedomFighterEx, on Jun 22 2011 - 18:49, said:

4 look stupid if you ask me, what about big 2 exhaust pipe instead?
big pipe = big smoke

now imagine if German manage to build this in WWII  :o


allies will scamper in fear until they get air support lol

HeliaXDemoN #32 Posted Jun 22 2011 - 23:49

    Sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 781 battles
  • 136
  • Member since:
    08-08-2010
Need double cannon tower!

Giganaut #33 Posted Jun 23 2011 - 03:30

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 10534 battles
  • 2,962
  • Member since:
    07-17-2010

View PostFreedomFighterEx, on Jun 22 2011 - 18:49, said:

4 look stupid if you ask me, what about big 2 exhaust pipe instead?
big pipe = big smoke



that is what i dont like. if an enemy saw the big exhaust smoke = "HEY GUYS! LOOK AT ME! IM HERE!"

Giganaut #34 Posted Jun 23 2011 - 03:32

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 10534 battles
  • 2,962
  • Member since:
    07-17-2010
SNEAK PEEK of the TD version of the T36 heavy, the M36 GMC, still need to work on it tho

http://d.facdn.net/a....giganaut_2.jpg

Giganaut #35 Posted Jun 23 2011 - 03:35

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 10534 battles
  • 2,962
  • Member since:
    07-17-2010

View PostHeliaXDemoN, on Jun 22 2011 - 23:49, said:

Need double cannon tower!

please do explain what did you meant by "double cannon tower"

Kazunemaru #36 Posted Jun 23 2011 - 05:53

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 11172 battles
  • 233
  • Member since:
    03-19-2011
Hey there, another good looking model; inspired by the T28/95?

I apologize in advance, I don't mean to ruin your intent with the tank names.  For the U.S. "T" is for prototype tanks, and anything with an "M" is a tank that has been accepted for service.  Much like german prototypes that begin with "vk" and vehicles that are accepted into service begin with "PzKpfw".

And I'm not saying you should change it, but I just wanted to let you know the "M36" designation is already taken by the M36 "Jackson" tank destroyer.

Giganaut #37 Posted Jun 23 2011 - 06:00

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 10534 battles
  • 2,962
  • Member since:
    07-17-2010

View PostKazunemaru, on Jun 23 2011 - 05:53, said:

Hey there, another good looking model; inspired by the T28/95?

I apologize in advance, I don't mean to ruin your intent with the tank names.  For the U.S. "T" is for prototype tanks, and anything with an "M" is a tank that has been accepted for service.  Much like german prototypes that begin with "vk" and vehicles that are accepted into service begin with "PzKpfw".

And I'm not saying you should change it, but I just wanted to let you know the "M36" designation is already taken by the M36 "Jackson" tank destroyer.


yes and also inspired by the hetzer and the JPz IV
thankyou for sharing that insightful information good sir, i'll rename the GMC right away, hmm... T36... hmm... T36-B GMC... (short of ideas for designation names)

FreedomFighterEx #38 Posted Jun 23 2011 - 07:20

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 2913 battles
  • 448
  • Member since:
    03-24-2011

View PostGiganaut, on Jun 23 2011 - 03:30, said:

that is what i dont like. if an enemy saw the big exhaust smoke = "HEY GUYS! LOOK AT ME! IM HERE!"

since the tank already gigantic, big smoke from exhaust gonna make it look like Devil coming through smoke to drag you to hell  :lol:
this is what i have thinking.

or else........exhaust smoke as smoke screen  :o

*have you try mix 4 tank nation together? if you ever do i want to see it.  :Smile_great:

Giganaut #39 Posted Jun 23 2011 - 07:56

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 10534 battles
  • 2,962
  • Member since:
    07-17-2010
this is for the Hilarity of "Land battleships"

and someone saying it needs "Dual cannon tower"


Posted Image

Darno #40 Posted Jun 23 2011 - 13:38

    Corporal

  • Beta Testers
  • 6441 battles
  • 76
  • Member since:
    01-25-2011
Oh my god...

It's... BEAUTIFUL.

And also, I have one more request, if you're not real busy.
Could you make a model of the Ultra-heavy O-I? I mean, 4 turrets must had been real bad ass like Maus.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users