Jump to content


New TD

M-50

  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

glarzz #1 Posted Apr 18 2015 - 21:45

    Private

  • Players
  • 18710 battles
  • 2
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013
Would it be possible to include the M-50 TD? It wouldn't be much different than any of the other small tanks or t/d's with a long reload time.

Schmit_ #2 Posted Apr 18 2015 - 22:45

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 19960 battles
  • 328
  • [QSSF] QSSF
  • Member since:
    03-22-2013
There is some long complex reason for this i'm sure but i belive its mostly down to the multi gun system not being there

Anlushac11 #3 Posted Apr 19 2015 - 01:54

    Major

  • Players
  • 32936 battles
  • 2,092
  • Member since:
    05-25-2013

Ahh took me a second, M50 Ontos.

 

Not in game cause WoT says they dont want smooth bore cannons and recoilless rifles

 

Ontos has 6 x recoilless rifles

 

Course when AW hits anythng is possible

 

 



GumboRex #4 Posted Sep 16 2015 - 21:41

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 19159 battles
  • 302
  • [GNZX2] GNZX2
  • Member since:
    07-05-2012
Only problem with this, even in AW, would be trying to 'balance' this thing. For an initial burst the Ontos would be ridiculous but then the poor saps have to get out of the vehicle to manually reload each of the RR tubes. It also was not possessed of anything considered great armor or mobility, but I have to admit even with all its faults and its ungainly appearance, I'm an Ontos fan myself. If they ever did find a way to put it into the game, I'd likely buy it or grind it as quickly as I was able.

Meplat #5 Posted Sep 21 2015 - 00:42

    Major

  • Players
  • 6613 battles
  • 7,831
  • [C-BOO] C-BOO
  • Member since:
    11-27-2012
Low (very low) magazine volume, absurd reload rate, no real armor, no way to really balance it's one salvo damage potential without making it the definition of a glass cannon.





Also tagged with M-50

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users