Jump to content


AW vs WOT


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
328 replies to this topic

Ninevia #1 Posted Jun 13 2015 - 11:31

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 25129 battles
  • 510
  • Member since:
    07-24-2014

guys you all knows  that soon new game is starting -armored warfare.

what you think ,whether this game will compete wot?

and what must change wot for keep their player, coz  just on  AW  test server  was fixed 1000000 players at moment.

I read some topic about  AW game play and its looks not bad. Special game play of arty, no bots and etc.

So what you advise  wot developers  for improving  our game? or what must change developers for keep this game alive.

 

1 of the big + wot at moment is that  it is well optimized and many players with weak computers can play this game.

 

 

for me :

change arty game play. arty must be supporter class , not  main demage maker. Delete arty from game is big stupid idea. arty is very interesting class and need this game. ( yeh i hate arty, but still think so )))

Bots.  WG don't must use bots in random battle. 

Golds. this is big question , use free golds or no in  random, for me will be great if golds shell be  is limited for each tank (maybe 4-5 )

so  what you think?



Kanmuru #2 Posted Jun 13 2015 - 11:33

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 14794 battles
  • 608
  • Member since:
    09-29-2013
AW will have success if they remove artillery. If they don't, it'll just be another WoT clone. woo optimism

PzBarkhorn #3 Posted Jun 13 2015 - 11:35

    Major

  • Players
  • 25311 battles
  • 2,193
  • [PZKMR] PZKMR
  • Member since:
    07-02-2011

View PostFacker07, on Jun 13 2015 - 10:31, said:

guys you all knows  that soon new game is starting -armored warfare.

what you think ,whether this game will compete wot?

and what must change wot for keep their player, coz  just on  AW  test server  was fixed 1000000 players at moment.

I read some topic about  AW game play and its looks not bad. Special game play of arty, no bots and etc.

So what you advise  wot developers  for improving  our game? or what must change developers for keep this game alive.

 

1 of the big + wot at moment is that  it is well optimized and many players with weak computers can play this game.

 

 

for me :

change arty game play. arty must be supporter class , not  main demage maker. Delete arty from game is big stupid idea. arty is very interesting class and need this game. ( yeh i hate arty, but still think so )))

Bots.  WG don't must use bots in random battle. 

Golds. this is big question , use free golds or no in  random, for me will be great if golds shell be  is limited for each tank (maybe 4-5 )

so  what you think?

I think this thread isnt going to last much...



redberets44 #4 Posted Jun 13 2015 - 11:36

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 30266 battles
  • 901
  • [ZEUS] ZEUS
  • Member since:
    08-08-2011
My gaming time will be divided between WoT, AW, Warthunder, planetside 2, DayZ, and soon Bf2 project reality :)

Ivan0089 #5 Posted Jun 13 2015 - 11:42

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 30806 battles
  • 367
  • Member since:
    05-13-2011

View PostFacker07, on Jun 13 2015 - 05:31, said:

guys you all knows  that soon new game is starting -armored warfare.

 

2546156-2478989_in_before_the_lock_2.jpg

 

 



kebab6597 #6 Posted Jun 13 2015 - 11:49

    Major

  • Players
  • 57869 battles
  • 9,081
  • [D-DAY] D-DAY
  • Member since:
    04-16-2011
I will play both they are 2 different games with different good and bad points and arty is the least of my concerns with WOT i,am far more frustrated with some players allmost BOT like behavior and stupidity than i,am with arty

Judge_Doom #7 Posted Jun 13 2015 - 11:52

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 14805 battles
  • 295
  • Member since:
    03-19-2013

View Postkebab6597, on Jun 13 2015 - 11:49, said:

I will play both they are 2 different games with different good and bad points and arty is the least of my concerns with WOT i,am far more frustrated with some players absolute stupidity than i,am with arty

 

I agree with you, except its going to be the same thing over at AW if those same idiots in this game migrate over there.

waga100 #8 Posted Jun 13 2015 - 11:54

    Captain

  • Players
  • 20064 battles
  • 1,857
  • [GOD_Z] GOD_Z
  • Member since:
    05-09-2012
this is how you get banned

Ricox #9 Posted Jun 13 2015 - 11:57

    Major

  • Players
  • 3801 battles
  • 2,461
  • [F-AUX] F-AUX
  • Member since:
    07-22-2010

View PostFacker07, on Jun 13 2015 - 12:31, said:

no bots and etc.

 

I don't like nitpicking, but really? You're giving it as an advantage the game has? That it has no bots... in the closed beta test of the game? Where so few people got in and where progress is very unlikely to be saved anyway, switching to open beta & then release?

 

I like some of the ideas implemented in AW, like the different way artillery works, but I'll have to see myself how good the game actually is. It looks fun, but I personally have a preference for the World War II/early Cold War tanks, they're much more interesting to me.



Tolos #10 Posted Jun 13 2015 - 11:59

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 25997 battles
  • 18,302
  • [GDF] GDF
  • Member since:
    09-22-2010
I've read the OP 3 times, and I still don't understand what the point is.....translation anyone ?. 

Ninevia #11 Posted Jun 13 2015 - 12:01

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 25129 battles
  • 510
  • Member since:
    07-24-2014

View Postwaga100, on Jun 13 2015 - 11:54, said:

this is how you get banned

 

banned for what?  for discussing?

On ru forum guys discussing about this without problem. So on Noth American forum is  much less democracy? lol

 

and i just want make WOT more better game and discussing  for my opinion is helping developers



gdead65 #12 Posted Jun 13 2015 - 12:02

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 30396 battles
  • 548
  • [GOLB] GOLB
  • Member since:
    12-25-2011

View PostPzBarkhorn, on Jun 13 2015 - 05:35, said:

I think this thread isnt going to last much...

 

 

agreed but SAD...perfect way for WG to get ideas to continue to improve their product



Ninevia #13 Posted Jun 13 2015 - 12:03

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 25129 battles
  • 510
  • Member since:
    07-24-2014

View Postgdead65, on Jun 13 2015 - 12:02, said:

 

 

agreed but SAD...perfect way for WG to get ideas to continue to improve their product

 

i think so, but how i see no 1 want this.

tomi87 #14 Posted Jun 13 2015 - 12:04

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 39791 battles
  • 381
  • [SUX] SUX
  • Member since:
    01-03-2011
well i do play aw's early access right now and i can say its looks much better than wot and also you will get arty warning when arty aiming you or shoot you :)

GeneralNobody #15 Posted Jun 13 2015 - 12:25

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 8466 battles
  • 795
  • [FEDUP] FEDUP
  • Member since:
    01-09-2013
Competition is good, regardless of whether we stay with wot or jump.

_Dynamic_Gameplay_ #16 Posted Jun 13 2015 - 12:26

    Captain

  • Players
  • 30723 battles
  • 1,889
  • Member since:
    03-05-2011

I'm actually downloading AW right now and I can say pretty confidently WoT won't be seeing much of me anymore, I might do some clan things but pub battles are the worst I have ever seen. Arty...not even going to go there. AW has taken World of Tanks, listened to the players ideas and concepts and fixed/removed/changed things as per that. That alone is why I will always prefer that game over this.

In before the lock too, not allowed to discuss other games on here.



ledhed14 #17 Posted Jun 13 2015 - 12:28

    Major

  • Players
  • 14449 battles
  • 6,523
  • [_SOA_] _SOA_
  • Member since:
    07-30-2011

Two distinctly different games . If you can't see it then your just playing shooters and not serious . Players who want WWII type action will stick with historical reality attempt , while " ace combat " player types will go for New " Modern types " .

 Its still online and same players will use both for fun . So same issues and complaints will be on forums of all the games . Pubs will have same players from here , what makes you think they will be any good ? The unbalanced teams and games existed already , you expect that to change by magic ? 

 Wargaming built up a following for tank warfare and tapped into something that didn't exist online . Its natural now for others to want some of the pie . Remember when WT ground forces was the answer ?

 That did not quite work out.

 For me ? The more games the better . Competition should bring welcome changes , but I can't see how it will improve MM and pub play.


Edited by ledhed14, Jun 13 2015 - 12:34.


OK_Heater #18 Posted Jun 13 2015 - 12:37

    Private

  • Players
  • 17901 battles
  • 3
  • Member since:
    11-02-2013
You have to take WOT for what it is. It's like ledhed said WWII. Just take the BOTS out and quit nerfing the tanks. AW will be interesting, but my winner is WOT...

Kalaman #19 Posted Jun 13 2015 - 12:45

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 10143 battles
  • 29
  • Member since:
    05-18-2011
I must be in the minority,  but so far AW isn't really grabbing me.   They have a lot of work to do yet.  Hopefully closer to release it will feel much better.

I'll keep testing it,  submitting reports, and wishing it becomes something truly enjoyable.

It also doesn't help that the AW community is already nearly as toxic as some can be on this forum,  I imagine it will become the same as soon as stats start flying around.  

When all is said and done, I've enjoyed my 4 years in WoT and I don't intend to stop playing (but I do need to stop worrying about my stats and just play)

To me AW is just another game in a genre I have come to enjoy, so if I enjoy it,  I'll play,  and if not,  I won't.





US_Cavalryman #20 Posted Jun 13 2015 - 12:45

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 67483 battles
  • 948
  • Member since:
    11-26-2011

Wow, the game hasn't even gotten to open beta and already there are comparisons?????  How about waiting until it comes out, works out it's bugs THEN compare.

 

I remember when War Thunder Ground Forces was supposed to kill WOT's.......didn't happen.  And I haven't heard all that many singing WTGF praises either!






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users