Jump to content


AW vs WOT


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
328 replies to this topic

Blottomiato #241 Posted Dec 03 2015 - 20:56

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 4524 battles
  • 285
  • Member since:
    07-23-2015

View PostTwidget_Gray, on Dec 03 2015 - 12:40, said:

 

This is all based on your 600 Battles in WOT and 100 AW battles, with the version of AW from 4 months ago.  Hmmm.    I also find it odd that you done 600 battles and 100 forum posts.    Very odd ratio.

 

 

What I find odd is why you think that has anything to do with my previous post?  Last time I checked, I was entitled to an opinion, the same as yourself.  Take it or leave it.

yereverluvinunclebert #242 Posted Dec 03 2015 - 22:20

    Major

  • Players
  • 16613 battles
  • 3,198
  • Member since:
    12-19-2012

View PostDaddyEggs15, on Dec 03 2015 - 11:22, said:

 

Duhhhhh...if you say so?  I bought a founders pack last July, played about 100 battles and my impression was...lame as sh!t.  It may have improved somewhat during the previous 5 months but, I thought the interface and game mechanics sucked to the point where I lost all interest in it and consider the $69.95 I spent a total waste.  Anyone who thinks AW is the better game is seriously deluded...and, by your comments about Russians, not real bright, either.  I would love to see WG sponsor a paid trip to Minsk just to show ding-dongs, like you, the difference between Belarusians and Russians because every time I see some loop-d-loo call WoT a, "Russian game" I cringe at their stupidity (WG probably LOL's).

 

What a load of doggy-doos.

Praematura #243 Posted Dec 03 2015 - 22:33

    Captain

  • Players
  • 50042 battles
  • 1,316
  • Member since:
    11-23-2011
If wot doesn't get some maps many will leave. Handful of maps SUCKS. It's stale playing same 5 maps. With the cutting of yet more maps with nothing new I'm looking for something else. Maybe just go back to CS.

MrDoomed #244 Posted Dec 03 2015 - 22:48

    Major

  • Players
  • 19184 battles
  • 2,723
  • Member since:
    05-09-2012

View PostDaddyEggs15, on Dec 03 2015 - 12:22, said:

 

Duhhhhh...if you say so?  I bought a founders pack last July, played about 100 battles and my impression was...lame as sh!t.  It may have improved somewhat during the previous 5 months but, I thought the interface and game mechanics sucked to the point where I lost all interest in it and consider the $69.95 I spent a total waste.  Anyone who thinks AW is the better game is seriously deluded...and, by your comments about Russians, not real bright, either.  I would love to see WG sponsor a paid trip to Minsk just to show ding-dongs, like you, the difference between Belarusians and Russians because every time I see some loop-d-loo call WoT a, "Russian game" I cringe at their stupidity (WG probably LOL's).

This made me laugh a long time lol. So if someone dont agree with his tiny amount of game play mindset is delusional and all kinds of wrong. Ah the hive mine in this forum would make the borg jealous. 

 

Oh and aw even in beta is far better in almost every way and give it 4 years to catch up and whats left of wot will just be elitist ghost talking about how great they are. Another thing i dont understand is the whole there is no players lol. My wait time in aw no matter what time of day is almost nothing and generally less than wot during peak hours but hey to each thier own. 

 

Ive got probably 1000 bucks invested in wot so i hang around hoping they get thier stuff together so wot is fun and fair again but i no longer give them a penny.



Blottomiato #245 Posted Dec 03 2015 - 23:07

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 4524 battles
  • 285
  • Member since:
    07-23-2015

View Postyereverluvinunclebert, on Dec 03 2015 - 16:20, said:

 

What a load of doggy-doos.

 

Posted Image

Blottomiato #246 Posted Dec 04 2015 - 00:50

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 4524 battles
  • 285
  • Member since:
    07-23-2015

View PostMrDoomed, on Dec 03 2015 - 16:48, said:

This made me laugh a long time lol. So if someone dont agree with his tiny amount of game play mindset is delusional and all kinds of wrong. Ah the hive mine in this forum would make the borg jealous.

 

Oh and aw even in beta is far better in almost every way and give it 4 years to catch up and whats left of wot will just be elitist ghost talking about how great they are. Another thing i dont understand is the whole there is no players lol. My wait time in aw no matter what time of day is almost nothing and generally less than wot during peak hours but hey to each thier own.

 

Ive got probably 1000 bucks invested in wot so i hang around hoping they get thier stuff together so wot is fun and fair again but i no longer give them a penny.

 

You probably play WoT the same way you write - incoherent and sloppy.  Take a 7th Grade English class and come back when you learn how to communicate a lucid and coherent thought.  Thanks.

 

I mean, so much of AW is a direct rip-off of WoT, the only thing that surprises me is why WG hasn't sued them yet - the same way one musician sues another for theft of intellectual property when they rip-off each other's melodies and song lyrics.

 

I gotta laugh whenever I see a player with sh!t stats, like your's, claiming AW is 'almost better in every way' when they haven't even come close to mastering the basics of WoT after 19k+ battles.  Almost as funny as this one's claim that queue-times in AW are less than WoT's.  :teethhappy:

 

 


Edited by DaddyEggs15, Dec 04 2015 - 15:53.


MrDoomed #247 Posted Dec 04 2015 - 00:53

    Major

  • Players
  • 19184 battles
  • 2,723
  • Member since:
    05-09-2012

View PostDaddyEggs15, on Dec 04 2015 - 00:50, said:

 

You probably play WoT the same way you write - incoherent and sloppy.  Take a 7th Grade English class and come back when you learn how to communicate a lucid and coherent thought.  Thanks.

 

Otherwise, your opinion of AW vs WoT is just as valid as mine but, I gotta laugh whenever I see a player with sh!t stats, like your's, claiming AW is 'almost better in every way' when you haven't even come close to mastering the basics of WoT after 19k+ battles.  Hilarious, bud.  Almost as funny as your claim that queue-times in AW are less than WoT's.  :teethhappy:

 

 

Oh noesssss he gots me lol. Cry on big daddy cry on. Your point is worthless.



Blottomiato #248 Posted Dec 04 2015 - 01:02

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 4524 battles
  • 285
  • Member since:
    07-23-2015

View PostMrDoomed, on Dec 03 2015 - 18:53, said:

Oh noesssss he gots me lol. Cry on big daddy cry on. Your point is worthless.

 

Posted Image

Guy4123 #249 Posted Dec 04 2015 - 05:32

    Major

  • Players
  • 4863 battles
  • 2,625
  • [MUP] MUP
  • Member since:
    05-02-2012

View PostDaddyEggs15, on Dec 03 2015 - 19:56, said:

 

What I find odd is why you think that has anything to do with my previous post?  Last time I checked, I was entitled to an opinion, the same as yourself.  Take it or leave it.

 

View PostDaddyEggs15, on Dec 03 2015 - 23:50, said:

 

You probably play WoT the same way you write - incoherent and sloppy.  Take a 7th Grade English class and come back when you learn how to communicate a lucid and coherent thought.  Thanks.

 

I mean, so much of AW is a direct rip-off of WoT, the only thing that surprises me is why WG hasn't sued them yet - the same way one musician sues another for theft of intellectual property when they rip-off each other's melodies and song lyrics.

 

Otherwise, your opinion of AW vs WoT is just as valid as mine but, I gotta laugh whenever I see a player with sh!t stats, like your's, claiming AW is 'almost better in every way' when they haven't even come close to mastering the basics of WoT after 19k+ battles.  Almost as funny as this one's claim that queue-times in AW are less than WoT's.  :teethhappy:

 

 

 

You have a inconsequential amount of games played in either game which means your opinion is actually quite worthless.

yereverluvinunclebert #250 Posted Dec 04 2015 - 10:39

    Major

  • Players
  • 16613 battles
  • 3,198
  • Member since:
    12-19-2012

View PostGuy4123, on Dec 04 2015 - 04:32, said:

 

You have a inconsequential amount of games played in either game which means your opinion is actually quite worthless.

 

Quite! Agreed. We shall ignore his 500-game ramblings.

Blottomiato #251 Posted Dec 04 2015 - 12:18

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 4524 battles
  • 285
  • Member since:
    07-23-2015

View PostGuy4123, on Dec 03 2015 - 23:32, said:

 

 

You have a inconsequential amount of games played in either game which means your opinion is actually quite worthless.

 

And you've played one battle - ONE BATTLE - in the last 60 days.  Your opinion is just as 'worthless' as mine.:trollface:

Guy4123 #252 Posted Dec 04 2015 - 12:24

    Major

  • Players
  • 4863 battles
  • 2,625
  • [MUP] MUP
  • Member since:
    05-02-2012

View PostDaddyEggs15, on Dec 04 2015 - 11:18, said:

 

And you've played one battle - ONE BATTLE - in the last 60 days.  Your opinion is just as 'worthless' as mine.:trollface:

 

I didn't give an opinion, you did.

Blottomiato #253 Posted Dec 04 2015 - 12:31

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 4524 battles
  • 285
  • Member since:
    07-23-2015

View Postyereverluvinunclebert, on Dec 04 2015 - 04:39, said:

 

Quite! Agreed. We shall ignore his 500-game ramblings.

 

Posted Image

Blottomiato #254 Posted Dec 04 2015 - 12:33

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 4524 battles
  • 285
  • Member since:
    07-23-2015

View PostGuy4123, on Dec 04 2015 - 06:24, said:

 

I didn't give an opinion, you did.

 

Uh, yeah, you did.  Your opinion is that my opinion is invalid based on the number of battles I've got.  How do you know that I'm not a re-roll with 15k+ battles?

 

Go play AW.  I couldn't care less - one less WoT whiner won't be missed.  I'm just saying that I tried AW, thought it sucked, thought it was basically a lame rip-off of WoT and that WoT is the better game.  I don't think anyone needs to play several thousand battles to have an opinion.  You think otherwise and that's fine with me.


Edited by DaddyEggs15, Dec 04 2015 - 12:38.


Guy4123 #255 Posted Dec 04 2015 - 12:35

    Major

  • Players
  • 4863 battles
  • 2,625
  • [MUP] MUP
  • Member since:
    05-02-2012

View PostDaddyEggs15, on Dec 04 2015 - 11:33, said:

 

Uh, yeah, you did.  Your opinion is that my opinion is invalid based on the number of battles I've got.  How do you know that I'm not a re-roll with 15k+ battles?

 

Because you would of said that before instead of

 

View PostDaddyEggs15, on Dec 04 2015 - 11:31, said:

 

 



BJ3226 #256 Posted Dec 04 2015 - 12:39

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 6580 battles
  • 126
  • Member since:
    08-28-2011
I do hope WG will be beaten. Let's pray for that.

Blottomiato #257 Posted Dec 04 2015 - 12:45

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 4524 battles
  • 285
  • Member since:
    07-23-2015

View PostGuy4123, on Dec 04 2015 - 06:35, said:

 

Because you would of said that before instead of

 

 

 

Really?  And I think you would've mentioned the fact that WoT is a game that you don't even play anymore before trying to discredit my opinion - and failing miserably in the process.

Guy4123 #258 Posted Dec 04 2015 - 13:13

    Major

  • Players
  • 4863 battles
  • 2,625
  • [MUP] MUP
  • Member since:
    05-02-2012

View PostDaddyEggs15, on Dec 04 2015 - 11:45, said:

 

Really?  And I think you would've mentioned the fact that WoT is a game that you don't even play anymore before trying to discredit my opinion - and failing miserably in the process.

 

Me not playing WoT anymore has no bearing on pointing out that having an extremely low battle count in either game invalidates your opinion on the matter. It would if I mentioned anything about WoT or AW being better than the other, but again I didn't give an opinion on the topic, you did.

 

You understand now pumpkin?



diesel__1 #259 Posted Dec 04 2015 - 13:50

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 8095 battles
  • 6,667
  • Member since:
    04-27-2015

View PostBJ3226, on Dec 04 2015 - 03:39, said:

I do hope WG will be beaten. Let's pray for that.

 

Let me ask you....why are you even here then? lol

 

You don't like the game, the developer...yet you take the time of day to peruse the forums and bitc.....errr....complain about it.  I think you just like complaining ;)



Blottomiato #260 Posted Dec 04 2015 - 15:39

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 4524 battles
  • 285
  • Member since:
    07-23-2015

View PostGuy4123, on Dec 04 2015 - 07:13, said:

 

Me not playing WoT anymore has no bearing on pointing out that having an extremely low battle count in either game invalidates your opinion on the matter. It would if I mentioned anything about WoT or AW being better than the other, but again I didn't give an opinion on the topic, you did.

 

You understand now pumpkin?

 

Again, this is just your opinion, cupcake.  Get over it.  Go play AW.  Nobody cares.

 

One final question, though, how many battles would be an acceptable number - to you - before someone's opinion becomes valid?  I don't think it takes most people (window-lickers, like you, excluded) to see that AW is a direct rip-off of WoT and that it sucks something fierce.


Edited by DaddyEggs15, Dec 04 2015 - 16:07.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users