Jump to content


AW vs WOT


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
328 replies to this topic

Gomez_Adams #281 Posted Jan 18 2016 - 15:31

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 5 battles
  • 5,402
  • Member since:
    04-06-2015

View PostR_Razor, on Jan 18 2016 - 09:28, said:

 

It's not, or at least not any more than sticking to his original account and improving on it would have been.............the only reason he (or anyone else) re-rolls is because #statsmatteryo and that's it.

 

Yes it is. You go into a new account knowing what to buy, what to play and what not to play, where all the spots are that are advantageous that you didn't know when you first started, all of it.

 

Saying that rerolling doesn't let you fix your mistakes is like saying that taking the same exact test over again after you know all the questions and answers isn't going to get you a better grade.

 

It's a completely preposterous remark.



SpitYoYoMafia #282 Posted Jan 18 2016 - 17:18

    Major

  • Players
  • 18942 battles
  • 14,069
  • Member since:
    05-25-2012

View PostGomez_Adams, on Jan 18 2016 - 06:31, said:

 

Yes it is. You go into a new account knowing what to buy, what to play and what not to play, where all the spots are that are advantageous that you didn't know when you first started, all of it.

 

Saying that rerolling doesn't let you fix your mistakes is like saying that taking the same exact test over again after you know all the questions and answers isn't going to get you a better grade.

 

It's a completely preposterous remark.

 

TL;DR basically you come into the game with more knowledge about the game leading to better stats for that game and the better you are the better your fresh accounts stats will look.

R_Razor #283 Posted Jan 18 2016 - 20:00

    Captain

  • Players
  • 8095 battles
  • 1,757
  • [_DDM] _DDM
  • Member since:
    08-20-2013

View PostGomez_Adams, on Jan 18 2016 - 09:31, said:

 

Yes it is. You go into a new account knowing what to buy, what to play and what not to play, where all the spots are that are advantageous that you didn't know when you first started, all of it.

 

Saying that rerolling doesn't let you fix your mistakes is like saying that taking the same exact test over again after you know all the questions and answers isn't going to get you a better grade.

 

It's a completely preposterous remark.

 

And why does it matter if you go in knowing these things? Oh that's right, because you'll WIN more and have better STATS much SOONER on a new account than you would if you had to IMPROVE your stats on an existing account...........it's all about that stats baby, no other reason AT ALL PERIOD to re-roll. +

SpitYoYoMafia #284 Posted Jan 18 2016 - 20:27

    Major

  • Players
  • 18942 battles
  • 14,069
  • Member since:
    05-25-2012

View PostR_Razor, on Jan 18 2016 - 11:00, said:

 

And why does it matter if you go in knowing these things? Oh that's right, because you'll WIN more and have better STATS much SOONER on a new account than you would if you had to IMPROVE your stats on an existing account...........it's all about that stats baby, no other reason AT ALL PERIOD to re-roll. +

 

If i had 20k games and I finally got a clue and my overall wn8 was 1200 or below I'd probably reroll to not look like a fool anymore because those stats aren't gonna budge.

Ecksdeee #285 Posted Jan 18 2016 - 20:53

    Major

  • Players
  • 17178 battles
  • 10,308
  • [WRPCK] WRPCK
  • Member since:
    04-06-2012
The entire premise of this thread is completely pointless since AW is deader than certain forum goers claim WoT to be.

R_Razor #286 Posted Jan 18 2016 - 21:38

    Captain

  • Players
  • 8095 battles
  • 1,757
  • [_DDM] _DDM
  • Member since:
    08-20-2013

View Post_Ninjax_, on Jan 18 2016 - 14:27, said:

 

If i had 20k games and I finally got a clue and my overall wn8 was 1200 or below I'd probably reroll to not look like a fool anymore because those stats aren't gonna budge.

 

And that's fine, at least you are honest about why you would do so, others would have you believe it's for some fantasy land reason about unicorns and pink elephants instead of wanting to be able to lay claim to better stats.

Deputy276 #287 Posted Jan 18 2016 - 21:55

    Major

  • Players
  • 20200 battles
  • 5,899
  • [3_NZ] 3_NZ
  • Member since:
    06-17-2013

View Postshadowhazcookie, on Jan 18 2016 - 13:53, said:

The entire premise of this thread is completely pointless since AW is deader than certain forum goers claim WoT to be.

 

Geez...I got a 3-day forum suspension for just posting the initials from the other game in another thread!!! Amazed this thread is still in existence and not locked down. Anyway, what shadow said above is correct. The other game shot themselves in the foot badly with their last patch and are bleeding players like crazy. They were asked to make random spawn "less predictable" in PvE. What they did was have enemy AI tanks spawning right behind, next to, or ON TOP OF your tank. Complaints are falling on deaf ears over there. It's why many people came back here. Kind of a shame. They started out pretty good. Good tanks and cool abilities like missiles. But the developers are completely clueless about tank games. They have Captain Kirk "beaming down" tanks all over the map. 

HalfPastZulu #288 Posted Jan 19 2016 - 11:18

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 24067 battles
  • 825
  • [ITE] ITE
  • Member since:
    10-02-2013

View PostIvan0089, on Jun 13 2015 - 05:42, said:

 

2546156-2478989_in_before_the_lock_2.jpg

 

 

i CAN'T READ THE LABEL....

 

What brand do you buy?

 

Is that a Starkist Kitty?



ledhed14 #289 Posted Jan 19 2016 - 11:40

    Major

  • Players
  • 14421 battles
  • 6,522
  • [_SOA_] _SOA_
  • Member since:
    07-30-2011

State of AW today ?

 LOLOL

 

 Service , ? Abysmal to very abysmal .

 Game ? - K but Pvp is TOXIC and makes WoT gang look like brain surgeons.

 In Game conduct ? Not policed and common to have a Guy TK whole team in Co op to farm alone ..lol..PVP ? LOL Toxic see above .

 Again a situation where GAME is fine but people who run it ?  have no idea what happened . Still have maps where you lag spike going to sniper and stuff Wot had ages ago and fixed . So maybe rules are Beta also .

 

 As a result ?

Block Quote

 The entire premise of this thread is completely pointless since AW is deader than certain forum goers claim WoT to be. 

 

 WOT -here after the others fail .

 


Edited by ledhed14, Jan 19 2016 - 11:43.


Deputy276 #290 Posted Jan 20 2016 - 07:50

    Major

  • Players
  • 20200 battles
  • 5,899
  • [3_NZ] 3_NZ
  • Member since:
    06-17-2013

View Postledhed14, on Jan 19 2016 - 04:40, said:

 

 WOT -here after the others fail .

 

 

Well I have some bad news for you. WOT isn't in all that great a shape either. The players numbers on the NA server are dropping WAY down. They only go up on school holidays or during Summer vacation. People are tired of crappy RNG, MM, and other problems that have plagued WOT since it's inception. New players are discouraged playing the same crappy maps over and over. And experienced players are tired of corridor maps and good maps disappearing with no replacements being made. Or "new" maps like Pilsen, which is just a ripoff of 3 existing maps. WOT may still be here, but it's not a healthy game by any stretch. :(



earthman34 #291 Posted Jan 20 2016 - 08:03

    Major

  • Players
  • 49481 battles
  • 3,235
  • Member since:
    07-17-2013
Armored Warfare is already a fail in my opinion. PVP is so broken everybody plays PVE.

SpitYoYoMafia #292 Posted Jan 20 2016 - 11:39

    Major

  • Players
  • 18942 battles
  • 14,069
  • Member since:
    05-25-2012

View Postearthman34, on Jan 19 2016 - 23:03, said:

Armored Warfare is already a fail in my opinion. PVP is so broken everybody plays PVE.

 

PvE games aren't a bad idea. I wouldn't mind if they just went full PvE and upgraded it.

diesel__1 #293 Posted Jan 20 2016 - 13:47

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 8095 battles
  • 6,668
  • Member since:
    04-27-2015

View PostDeputy276, on Jan 19 2016 - 22:50, said:

 

 WOT may still be here, but it's not a healthy game by any stretch. :(

 

Pretty healthy if it's still here ;)

Cirran #294 Posted Jan 20 2016 - 13:52

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 12467 battles
  • 702
  • [SHAB] SHAB
  • Member since:
    03-27-2011

Personally, I would LOVE to see PvE like AW has implemented here in WoT. Man, think of how nice the pub matches would be if you all the horribads like myself were playing in PvE.

 

Cirran



WarStore #295 Posted Jan 20 2016 - 13:55

    Major

  • Players
  • 39528 battles
  • 13,516
  • Member since:
    01-31-2011

View Postledhed14, on Jan 19 2016 - 10:40, said:

 

 Game ? - K but Pvp is TOXIC and makes WoT gang look like brain surgeons.

 

 

Weird. They don't have XVM there, and it seems everything is XVM`s fault here. 



teamoldmill #296 Posted Jan 20 2016 - 14:06

    Major

  • Players
  • 15473 battles
  • 11,471
  • Member since:
    03-19-2011

A game where all your upgrades are just different versions of the same tank? Blah. Great, you play 5 versions of the Abrams or Leo.......

 

They chose the wrong time period I think. No flavor, no cool factor. Like it or not, WW II was the perfect time for tanks, so many different ones, such fast development, and they actually saw combat constantly.



WarStore #297 Posted Jan 20 2016 - 14:19

    Major

  • Players
  • 39528 battles
  • 13,516
  • Member since:
    01-31-2011

View Postteamoldmill, on Jan 20 2016 - 13:06, said:

A game where all your upgrades are just different versions of the same tank? Blah. Great, you play 5 versions of the Abrams or Leo.......

 

They chose the wrong time period I think. No flavor, no cool factor. Like it or not, WW II was the perfect time for tanks, so many different ones, such fast development, and they actually saw combat constantly.

 

Well, in WoT we have millions of clones of the same tank for more than one nation.

teamoldmill #298 Posted Jan 20 2016 - 14:25

    Major

  • Players
  • 15473 battles
  • 11,471
  • Member since:
    03-19-2011

View PostWarStore, on Jan 20 2016 - 13:19, said:

 

Well, in WoT we have millions of clones of the same tank for more than one nation.

 

True, but nowhere near the boring factor of AW. Imagine if Tier 6 through 10 was Tiger II, Tiger II A, Tiger II B, Tiger II C, Tiger II D...... I dunno, had no interest in just looking at the lines. Game play was fine, but no desire to grind out a tank because it has a different letter in its name and not really much else.

SpitYoYoMafia #299 Posted Jan 20 2016 - 14:56

    Major

  • Players
  • 18942 battles
  • 14,069
  • Member since:
    05-25-2012

View Postteamoldmill, on Jan 20 2016 - 05:25, said:

 

True, but nowhere near the boring factor of AW. Imagine if Tier 6 through 10 was Tiger II, Tiger II A, Tiger II B, Tiger II C, Tiger II D...... I dunno, had no interest in just looking at the lines. Game play was fine, but no desire to grind out a tank because it has a different letter in its name and not really much else.

 

Personally I think that if you find AW boring that the problem is you.

 

Meanwhile WoTs has several clones of the same tank so if you really want to go there.

 

Not to mention that the AW engine is far better and the gameplay is a hell of a lot more enjoyable and hey no corridor meta.

 

You can also actually out real upgrades onto your tanks that actually does stuff rather than using the same 4 equipment pieces over and over and over again.


Edited by _Ninjax_, Jan 20 2016 - 14:57.


21Blackjack #300 Posted Jan 20 2016 - 16:36

    Major

  • Players
  • 20794 battles
  • 2,533
  • Member since:
    02-03-2012

View Post_Ninjax_, on Jan 20 2016 - 14:56, said:

 

Personally I think that if you find AW boring that the problem is you.

 

 

Then a lot of people are him.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users