Jump to content


Foch 155 Parked.....


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

Dirizon #21 Posted Feb 04 2016 - 02:51

    Major

  • Players
  • 27352 battles
  • 4,904
  • Member since:
    06-05-2011

View Post1_ace_1, on Feb 03 2016 - 11:30, said:

So what is bad about it, and what could be done to improve it?

 

nothing is truly bad with it, as it competes statistically with other tier 1O TDs. What is bad, is that it is a crude shadow of it's initial release, far less destructive and influential. the damage potential and offense was quickly balanced for the Fochs 15.5, but is taking a long time for the equally, or more so, destructive Waffen E1OO.

 

What most people complain about though, are the stinging nerfs fochs 15.5 received all at once. Roof armour reduced large time, flanks side/rear reduced 4O/4O from 5O/5O  (Important for autobounce vs overmatch) engine reduction from 12OO to 1k horsepower,  lowering ofcupola and handle bar top armour, gun movement penalties increased, and inter magazine space between shots time increased. 

Also hurting it was indirect HEAT nerf, TD damage nerf to 75O, which makes the difference in salvo damage

 

Most people want the engine given back to it, and the side/rear 1Omm, so flank armour harder to easy overmatch



DrapesForDays #22 Posted Feb 04 2016 - 04:41

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 13291 battles
  • 11
  • [MCHNR] MCHNR
  • Member since:
    12-02-2011

View PostDirizon, on Feb 04 2016 - 01:51, said:

 

nothing is truly bad with it, as it competes statistically with other tier 1O TDs. What is bad, is that it is a crude shadow of it's initial release, far less destructive and influential. the damage potential and offense was quickly balanced for the Fochs 15.5, but is taking a long time for the equally, or more so, destructive Waffen E1OO.

 

What most people complain about though, are the stinging nerfs fochs 15.5 received all at once. Roof armour reduced large time, flanks side/rear reduced 4O/4O from 5O/5O  (Important for autobounce vs overmatch) engine reduction from 12OO to 1k horsepower,  lowering ofcupola and handle bar top armour, gun movement penalties increased, and inter magazine space between shots time increased. 

Also hurting it was indirect HEAT nerf, TD damage nerf to 75O, which makes the difference in salvo damage

 

Most people want the engine given back to it, and the side/rear 1Omm, so flank armour harder to easy overmatch

 

Just curious.... Is there a reason you use the letter "O" in place of the number "0" when you type numbers?






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users