Jump to content


WG should be sued for Premium Tank Nurfs


  • Please log in to reply
56 replies to this topic

BlueLivesMatter #1 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:04

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 28514 battles
  • 58
  • Member since:
    04-18-2011
Yes....Wargaming should have a class action lawsuit against them by their player base for Fraud, Theft, and Deceptive Business Practices.  You clowns have no problem taking our money for premium tanks only to nurf them to almost unplayable. We pay very good money for these tanks.   Any of the premium tanks should have preferred match making.  This may help solve some of the issues.  You ask what am I talking about?  IS6 gun blows!!! T34-3 gun blows worse than the IS6, Lowes is no where even close to what it was when it came out, Jag 8.8 gun sucks against Tier 9 and 10s.  You can not take our money for something we paid for and then change it...I am sure you will come up with some bull line like look in the EULA and we can do what ever we want.  Anyone add anything else

Edited by BlueLivesMatter, Feb 18 2016 - 00:07.


Hiro_hamada #2 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:08

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 15383 battles
  • 99
  • [F0XEY] F0XEY
  • Member since:
    09-05-2011
if your jag 8.8 is seeing tier 10s your clearly doing it wrong 

Fritz_15 #3 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:09

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 1735 battles
  • 37
  • [BLESD] BLESD
  • Member since:
    02-21-2015
From my experience with WoT, you have to play the tanks for a while to get the hang of them. Even by playing the 'worst' tanks a lot, you can get so good, that your averaging somewhere between 1 and 2 kills a game. Now, I have had experience with this sort of stuff. I bought a Chi-Nu-Kai, and I'll admit that it sort of sucked there for a while, but after playing it a couple of times, I'm now starting to average about 1 kill a game in it. I agree with you that some tanks seam horrible, but just play them a couple to a fair amount of games, and then it won't be so bad.

BlueLivesMatter #4 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:10

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 28514 battles
  • 58
  • Member since:
    04-18-2011

True Jag dont get 10s...I was pissed when I wrote it

 



WindexIsMyFavoriteFlavor #5 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:10

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 23116 battles
  • 70
  • [AGFR] AGFR
  • Member since:
    08-21-2011
so you are complaining about power creep which will happen no matter what they do.

I think your issue is you think that if you pay for something you should be horribly OP compared to all other tanks, which you are in the sense that you make a butt load of credits and pay less for repairs and ammo.  Also if you are having a hard time penning shoot gold or learn to aim it is really not that hard.

TLWiz #6 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:10

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 16419 battles
  • 8,858
  • [DSSRT] DSSRT
  • Member since:
    12-26-2014
I am not too sure that making the JgTg 8.8 faster, giving the T-34-3 better gun depression, or improving the armor on the IS-6 is grounds for a law suit. This is just my opinion, but these three tanks in particular are pretty good. All of them have limited MM too.

Edited by TLWiz, Feb 18 2016 - 00:12.


BlueLivesMatter #7 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:12

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 28514 battles
  • 58
  • Member since:
    04-18-2011

View PostFritz_15, on Feb 17 2016 - 17:09, said:

From my experience with WoT, you have to play the tanks for a while to get the hang of them. Even by playing the 'worst' tanks a lot, you can get so good, that your averaging somewhere between 1 and 2 kills a game. Now, I have had experience with this sort of stuff. I bought a Chi-Nu-Kai, and I'll admit that it sort of sucked there for a while, but after playing it a couple of times, I'm now starting to average about 1 kill a game in it. I agree with you that some tanks seam horrible, but just play them a couple to a fair amount of games, and then it won't be so bad.

 

You have 868 battles...ummmmm

Conejo82 #8 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:13

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 25543 battles
  • 376
  • [HARE] HARE
  • Member since:
    03-10-2012
though i never played it, i still remember when they gave refunds for the Super when it was nerfed. one guy i know took the refund, cuz the nerf was so bad

BlueLivesMatter #9 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:13

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 28514 battles
  • 58
  • Member since:
    04-18-2011

View Post298th_Smaug, on Feb 17 2016 - 17:10, said:

so you are complaining about power creep which will happen no matter what they do.

I think your issue is you think that if you pay for something you should be horribly OP compared to all other tanks, which you are in the sense that you make a butt load of credits and pay less for repairs and ammo.  Also if you are having a hard time penning shoot gold or learn to aim it is really not that hard.

 

and this comes from someone that doesnt have better stats than I do....troll more

Hawkeye__Pierce #10 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:13

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 10488 battles
  • 929
  • Member since:
    01-02-2013

View PostBlueLivesMatter, on Feb 17 2016 - 17:04, said:

Yes....Wargaming should have a class action lawsuit against them by their player base for Fraud, Theft, and Deceptive Business Practices.  You clowns have no problem taking our money for premium tanks only to nurf them to almost unplayable. We pay very good money for these tanks.   Any of the premium tanks should have preferred match making.  This may help solve some of the issues.  You ask what am I talking about?  IS6 gun blows!!! T34-3 gun blows worse than the IS6, Lowes is no where even close to what it was when it came out, Jag 8.8 gun sucks against Tier 9 and 10s.  You can not take our money for something we paid for and then change it...I am sure you will come up with some bull line like look in the EULA and we can do what ever we want.  Anyone add anything else

 

Not sure if troll post but ill take the bait all of those i can agree on except the Lowe and IS-6 the Lowe is great at sniping and thats what it is meant to do the IS-6 could use a small ap pen buff but other than that its fine

 



Hiro_hamada #11 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:13

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 15383 battles
  • 99
  • [F0XEY] F0XEY
  • Member since:
    09-05-2011
i mean the is6 and t34-3 both use a 122mm gun and if you have played any russian/chinese tanks that use a 122mm you already know what your getting yourself into with the derpy accuracy 

The_Mighty_Zsar #12 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:15

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 13075 battles
  • 566
  • [ZSAR] ZSAR
  • Member since:
    10-08-2013
When you play this game, you click "approve" on the EULA. You cannot sue wargaming, they have the right to do whatever they want to this game. 

Silvers_ #13 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:15

    Major

  • Players
  • 38890 battles
  • 4,912
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    06-12-2012

hate to break it to you but any "class action" lawsuit would be tossed out. EULA says they can make changes if/when/ as they see fit. This includes the product...i.e. the "pixel tonk"

 

 



Fritz_15 #14 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:16

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 1735 battles
  • 37
  • [BLESD] BLESD
  • Member since:
    02-21-2015

View PostBlueLivesMatter, on Feb 17 2016 - 17:12, said:

 

You have 868 battles...ummmmm

 

I know I haven't had as many battles as you, but since I don't have as many tanks, I only play in a couple of them, and REALLY get the hang of them. (Such as, with my premium Char B, I found out that against Matildas, I had to shoot apr at the gun mantel to penetrate, and this only came about from a fair amount of battles. 

WindexIsMyFavoriteFlavor #15 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:17

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 23116 battles
  • 70
  • [AGFR] AGFR
  • Member since:
    08-21-2011

View PostBlueLivesMatter, on Feb 17 2016 - 18:13, said:

 

and this comes from someone that doesnt have better stats than I do....troll more

 

 not a baddy so no idea why stats are being brought up so heavily.  I did not even look at your tags or stats so I am just stating from someone who has played my fair share of battles and decently my thoughts on prem tanks.

 



panzermk6 #16 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:18

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 943 battles
  • 16
  • Member since:
    03-03-2011
If anything, IS6 players on NA in blitz should be mad. We got +1/-1 MM for ALL tanks, making premium mm more or less worthless.

Fritz_15 #17 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:19

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 1735 battles
  • 37
  • [BLESD] BLESD
  • Member since:
    02-21-2015

View PostBlueLivesMatter, on Feb 17 2016 - 17:13, said:

 

and this comes from someone that doesnt have better stats than I do....troll more

 

I am simply using logic, for instance, when everyone was a baby they learned how to use fork, knife, spoon, and the way they learned that was from experience through using it. And this DOES relate to tanks, you do it a lot, you get to know its strong points, weaknesses, and how to play it.

Cutthroatlemur #18 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:22

    Major

  • Players
  • 16600 battles
  • 10,037
  • Member since:
    08-24-2011
Poor OP, doesn't understand the difference between nerfs and power-creep (the Lowe was buffed recently) and also clearly doesn't understand the EULA or the legal system (you are a cop right?).

Doctor_AnThrax #19 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:26

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 15010 battles
  • 895
  • [_A_A_] _A_A_
  • Member since:
    10-06-2014

I see you have no idea what the EULA is 

 



aberant #20 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:29

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 7684 battles
  • 356
  • Member since:
    08-24-2013

You're complaining about pixel tanks?

 

Did you know that if the company went under we would all lose our 'tanks'?  No, you don't get a refund.  Think about that.

 

And, Fritz was being helpful.  Can you see that?






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users