Jump to content


WG should be sued for Premium Tank Nurfs


  • Please log in to reply
56 replies to this topic

Gurdy2383 #21 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:31

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 44315 battles
  • 960
  • [NA-CL] NA-CL
  • Member since:
    11-05-2012
These tanks have all been buffed not nerfed.

Fritz_15 #22 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:32

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 1735 battles
  • 37
  • [BLESD] BLESD
  • Member since:
    02-21-2015

View Postaberant, on Feb 17 2016 - 17:29, said:

You're complaining about pixel tanks?

 

Did you know that if the company went under we would all lose our 'tanks'?  No, you don't get a refund.  Think about that.

 

And, Fritz was being helpful.  Can you see that?

 

here here!!!!



abandoned_spirit #23 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:33

    Major

  • Players
  • 26567 battles
  • 2,481
  • [VILIN] VILIN
  • Member since:
    08-19-2012
This thread makes CRD feel good about itself

Hiro_hamada #24 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:35

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 15383 battles
  • 99
  • [F0XEY] F0XEY
  • Member since:
    09-05-2011

View Postabandoned_spirit, on Feb 17 2016 - 18:33, said:

This thread makes CRD feel good about itself

 

Abandoned <3 luv ur stream :)

Brick94 #25 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:35

    Captain

  • Players
  • 36620 battles
  • 1,475
  • Member since:
    08-03-2013

View PostBlueLivesMatter, on Feb 18 2016 - 00:04, said:

Yes....Wargaming should have a class action lawsuit against them by their player base for Fraud, Theft, and Deceptive Business Practices.  You clowns have no problem taking our money for premium tanks only to nurf them to almost unplayable. We pay very good money for these tanks.   Any of the premium tanks should have preferred match making.  This may help solve some of the issues.  You ask what am I talking about?  IS6 gun blows!!! T34-3 gun blows worse than the IS6, Lowes is no where even close to what it was when it came out, Jag 8.8 gun sucks against Tier 9 and 10s.  You can not take our money for something we paid for and then change it...I am sure you will come up with some bull line like look in the EULA and we can do what ever we want.  Anyone add anything else

 

Are you mentally disabled?  Should and did are 2 different things.  Buyer be ware.  If you were dumb enough to buy these tanks, then it's your own dam fault.

Gravtech #26 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:36

    Major

  • Players
  • 26989 battles
  • 3,714
  • [FELOW] FELOW
  • Member since:
    09-18-2013

View PostBlueLivesMatter, on Feb 17 2016 - 15:13, said:

 

and this comes from someone that doesnt have better stats than I do....troll more

 

coming from a guy who's recent stats are worse than his overall...troll more

 



ace007_2 #27 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:39

    Private

  • -Players-
  • 3013 battles
  • 6
  • Member since:
    07-23-2014
they do have every right to do whatever the heck they want with the game. after all, you bought THERE premium tanks. you accepted the terms and conditions i know you didn't read. its in there. believe me when i say that the war gaming administration is smarter than you. obviously, since you made this post.

65Camino #28 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:42

    Captain

  • Players
  • 26489 battles
  • 1,083
  • [2CMBG] 2CMBG
  • Member since:
    09-18-2013
:child:

BlueLivesMatter #29 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:42

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 28514 battles
  • 58
  • Member since:
    04-18-2011
This is so much fun watching all the trolls.....................

Cutthroatlemur #30 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:47

    Major

  • Players
  • 16524 battles
  • 10,013
  • Member since:
    08-24-2011

View PostBlueLivesMatter, on Feb 17 2016 - 15:42, said:

This is so much fun watching all the trolls.....................

 

where's your Avatar?

Never_Lose_Hope #31 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:51

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 14072 battles
  • 422
  • [-HOPE] -HOPE
  • Member since:
    06-10-2014

View PostCutthroatlemur, on Feb 17 2016 - 15:47, said:

 

where's your Avatar?

 

I just finished loading mine onto here and noticed how much I need to improve....

But also how much ive come along...



eward17 #32 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:51

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 11075 battles
  • 283
  • [LOAD] LOAD
  • Member since:
    04-04-2015
You do understand, you didn't spend money on the actual tank itself and its current stats, you spent money to ACCESS that tank, and what they do to is is not your choice whatsoever. Just like stock markets, you invest money to try to earn a profit back ( like tier 8 prem), but the company does whatever they want with the money, not you. Therefore, your argument is invalid. 

kebab6597 #33 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:55

    Major

  • Players
  • 51228 battles
  • 8,100
  • [D-DAY] D-DAY
  • Member since:
    04-16-2011

View PostBlueLivesMatter, on Feb 17 2016 - 23:04, said:

Yes....Wargaming should have a class action lawsuit against them by their player base for Fraud, Theft, and Deceptive Business Practices.  You clowns have no problem taking our money for premium tanks only to nurf them to almost unplayable. We pay very good money for these tanks.   Any of the premium tanks should have preferred match making.  This may help solve some of the issues.  You ask what am I talking about?  IS6 gun blows!!! T34-3 gun blows worse than the IS6, Lowes is no where even close to what it was when it came out, Jag 8.8 gun sucks against Tier 9 and 10s.  You can not take our money for something we paid for and then change it...I am sure you will come up with some bull line like look in the EULA and we can do what ever we want.  Anyone add anything else

 

IS-6 gun has allways been pretty bad and it has not been nerfed infact i believe its being buffed in the next patch

T34-3 was recently buffed its never been nerfed

Lowe is better now than it was when it first came out its had substantial buffs recently 

Jag Tig 8.8 has also been buffed recently

 

 

TBH OP every one of the tanks you mentioned has been buffed not one of them have been nerfed and bringing players stats into this thread is not only pointless it also makes you look foolish, i can understand your probably just having a bad day and your lashing out at anything but players stats have nothing to do with tank buffs/nerfs



Dunfalach #34 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:58

    Major

  • Players
  • 18301 battles
  • 4,551
  • [-APCR] -APCR
  • Member since:
    01-07-2012

I don't doubt Lowe has been power-creeped considering how long it's been in the game. I'm of the opinion that WG keeps it as the only German heavy premium because they know a lot of new players will:

 

1) assume the most expensive must be the best, and buy it.

2) come to the game because Tigers are cool and thus buy the German heavy assuming it will be cool too.

 

I barely play mine because i have other premiums that I like better. That said, after watching the "Unicum Guide" by sliphantom on Youtube, I've been tinkering with it a bit more. Major foul language warnings for the video though.

 

T-34-3 is my third most played and current favorite tank. A patch or two ago it got a gun depression buff from -3 to -5 that made a major improvement. Yes, the pen on it is weak, but I barely ever use premium in it. I use mobility to get side shots, bully weaker tanks, and take advantage of the ability to now hit some lower frontal plates that used to be impossible with the -3 depression. The skill floor is high, it can be very unforgiving, RNG can drive you mad with the gun handling, but it's still one of the most fun for me to drive. And it does get preferential MM still.

 

IS-6 gets preferential MM still. Yes, the gun is bad for a frontal brawler and could use a buff. But it has a good APCR round and a credit multiplier that means you can run APCR as a primary round and still crank out cash. I carry 2/3 APCR on mine, and only switch to the AP round when I know for sure from the minimap that I'm only meeting tier 6 and 7 in the area. And supposedly it's getting an armor buff in the next patch. It's widely regarded as one of the most noob-friendly premiums in tier 8, since it has workable armor.

 

JT88 just got a buff in the last patch or two, with a little more mobility and the removal of the machine gun weak spot. I haven't run mine since the buff to have a personal opinion on it, but I've heard some praise from people who drive it more regularly.

 

I do agree that some of the newer premiums would really be better if they had preferential MM. But WG made the decision to stop making new ones with pref MM just a few months back, and they don't seem likely to change that. What we have seen is a few premiums come out that are basically equal to non-premiums of their tier instead of the old idea that it must be a little worse than other tanks of its tier, so we may see that trend continue. They're also gradually using the shift to HD models as an opportunity to rebalance some of the older tanks, a few per patch, so some more of the older premiums and older tank tree tanks may get little buffs for power creep along the way in the future.



Fritz_15 #35 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 00:58

    Corporal

  • -Players-
  • 1735 battles
  • 37
  • [BLESD] BLESD
  • Member since:
    02-21-2015

View PostGravtech, on Feb 17 2016 - 17:36, said:

 

coming from a guy who's recent stats are worse than his overall...troll more

 

 

My first response is: 

1. That I can't always carry my team if we're being slotered.

2. The damage received can sometimes come from unknown positions, or arty

3. And my last is that of Red Herring. You are committing a logical fallacy called a Red Herring, which is were you bring up a completely irrelevant topic. Just cause I don't have as much experience as a lot of you guys, doesn't mean that I can't use logical reasoning to come up with (almost) self evident conclusions.

 



WindexIsMyFavoriteFlavor #36 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 01:01

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 23068 battles
  • 70
  • [AGFR] AGFR
  • Member since:
    08-21-2011

View PostFritz_15, on Feb 17 2016 - 18:58, said:

 

My first response is:

1. That I can't always carry my team if we're being slotered.

2. The damage received can sometimes come from unknown positions, or arty

3. And my last is that of Red Herring. You are committing a logical fallacy called a Red Herring, which is were you bring up a completely irrelevant topic. Just cause I don't have as much experience as a lot of you guys, doesn't mean that I can't use logical reasoning to come up with (almost) self evident conclusions.

 

 

Fritz, he was talking about me and him stats wise.
Just saying also feel free to message me in game and we can run some platoons, I will help you carry a team.

 


Edited by 298th_Smaug, Feb 18 2016 - 01:04.


Preddy_ #37 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 01:03

    Major

  • Players
  • 9629 battles
  • 4,244
  • [T-F-Z] T-F-Z
  • Member since:
    06-28-2013

Complains about nerfs to pref MM tanks that never happened and then complains that these same pref MM tanks should at least get pref MM which they already have...

 

Threatens lawsuit after agreeing to the EULA which allows WG to do whatever they choose to do...

 

Calls people trolls simply for stating the obvious...

 

seems legit.



cloudwalkr #38 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 01:10

    Major

  • Players
  • 49945 battles
  • 3,174
  • [HAVOK] HAVOK
  • Member since:
    04-05-2011
You might have a case if WG didn't make you sign a contract agreeing to let them change, replace, or modify in any way they want any tank they want.  Keep this in mind next time you feel like spending money on this game.

Yuri_Doujinshi #39 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 01:16

    Major

  • Players
  • 22020 battles
  • 2,688
  • [YOUJO] YOUJO
  • Member since:
    05-07-2012

Obvious troll post is obvious.

 

Is that you Assad?



RF_Van #40 Posted Feb 18 2016 - 01:18

    Captain

  • Players
  • 8983 battles
  • 1,099
  • Member since:
    04-13-2013

View PostDunfalach, on Feb 17 2016 - 15:58, said:

 

 

^ Excellent comment +1.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users