Jump to content


Hungary's Turán III On Sale Now!


  • Please log in to reply
43 replies to this topic

Content_WG #1 Posted Apr 01 2016 - 14:20

    Wargaming America

  • Administrator
  • 0 battles
  • 3,238
  • Member since:
    01-17-2011
The first Hungarian medium tank rolls out!

Full news text

Globemaster1998 #2 Posted Apr 01 2016 - 14:26

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 17072 battles
  • 2,184
  • Member since:
    04-13-2014
Looks better than the AC 1 Sentinal and has better specs.

CaptanW #3 Posted Apr 01 2016 - 14:28

    Captain

  • Players
  • 18462 battles
  • 1,581
  • Member since:
    06-09-2013
Quickybaby did a video on this tank.

Spanktankk #4 Posted Apr 01 2016 - 14:29

    Major

  • Players
  • 37028 battles
  • 11,110
  • [KFB] KFB
  • Member since:
    04-19-2011

Pz 3/4 gun with worse, unsloped armor and half the speed.

 

No thanks.

 

The crapquality of premiums WG is puking out at an ever increased level is astounding.



FOGofWAR #5 Posted Apr 01 2016 - 14:29

    Captain

  • Beta Testers
  • 29307 battles
  • 1,093
  • [-FU-] -FU-
  • Member since:
    01-20-2011
  My porn name is Hung Gary.

someguy124 #6 Posted Apr 01 2016 - 14:30

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 32068 battles
  • 522
  • [Y0L0] Y0L0
  • Member since:
    07-16-2010
32 Rounds with a 3.3 second reload. No thanks, i don't like tanks that can run out of ammo 2-3 minutes into the game.

gpc_4 #7 Posted Apr 01 2016 - 14:47

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 42423 battles
  • 4,629
  • [DHO-X] DHO-X
  • Member since:
    07-06-2014
What's with the low ammo count? Makes no damn sense.

Thadis #8 Posted Apr 01 2016 - 14:47

    Staff sergeant

  • -Players-
  • 14909 battles
  • 371
  • Member since:
    04-11-2015

Seems like an awfully low ammo load for a gun that is so… Hungary for ammunition. 

 

Look WG, between this and the AC 1, I think there is some senior person on the staff who makes typos when telling people what numbers they should set tank stats, and then is psychologically incapable of admitting they made a mistake. I am not being insulting, merely pointing out that this may be due to a treatable medical condition that should be addressed before the store gets flooded with tanks that have inexplicably wthstats attached to them.



Sergeant_Lee #9 Posted Apr 01 2016 - 15:01

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 12685 battles
  • 932
  • [PIR8] PIR8
  • Member since:
    03-09-2015

View PostThadis, on Apr 01 2016 - 08:47, said:

Seems like an awfully low ammo load for a gun that is so… Hungary for ammunition. 

 

Look WG, between this and the AC 1, I think there is some senior person on the staff who makes typos when telling people what numbers they should set tank stats, and then is psychologically incapable of admitting they made a mistake. I am not being insulting, merely pointing out that this may be due to a treatable medical condition that should be addressed before the store gets flooded with tanks that have inexplicably wthstats attached to them.

 

On the bright side, at least they listened to us and stopped with the crazy bundles? lol

Legiondude #10 Posted Apr 01 2016 - 15:10

    Major

  • Players
  • 20466 battles
  • 23,190
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    08-22-2011

View Postgpc_4, on Apr 01 2016 - 07:47, said:

What's with the low ammo count? Makes no damn sense.

It was actually that low, the interior of the tank was quite packed



Cognitive_Dissonance #11 Posted Apr 01 2016 - 15:17

    Major

  • Players
  • 40641 battles
  • 6,402
  • [ANASS] ANASS
  • Member since:
    01-31-2013

View PostSergeant_Lee, on Apr 01 2016 - 08:01, said:

 

On the bright side, at least they listened to us and stopped with the crazy bundles? lol

 

Yes!! I have noticed this too. I am glad they are giving us options now. I will buy 9.99 tanks all day!

Verblonde #12 Posted Apr 01 2016 - 15:18

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 17996 battles
  • 2,978
  • [FUNTB] FUNTB
  • Member since:
    02-08-2015
I think I'll get one of these this evening: it has a number of sterling qualities, including not being the Sentinel and, more crucially, not being plastered in godsawful advertisements for some tedious attempted e-sports nonsense!

Ironclad73 #13 Posted Apr 01 2016 - 15:40

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 22344 battles
  • 3,547
  • [DHO6] DHO6
  • Member since:
    07-26-2014

I only had time for 1 battle in it, not bad so far, of course our team rolled the enemy so fast I didn't need much ammo, but I can see it being a problem in some games.

As I really like the T-25 I was concerned about its lower speed, but it accelerates well, gets up to top speed pretty quickly on level ground, didn't get a chance to try on a hill.

It is lower and smaller than the T-25 so should have better camo. Gun handling is better than than the T-25 which is nice. Looks like it could be a good tank to flank and sneak up close before spotted and shoot and scoot back into cover.

Has the same crew count (5) as the T-25.

Hope to get more battles in tonight and get a better perspective.

 



Deputy276 #14 Posted Apr 01 2016 - 15:51

    Major

  • Players
  • 19959 battles
  • 5,790
  • [3_NZ] 3_NZ
  • Member since:
    06-17-2013

Saw one last night, but he died too fast to get any kind of impression of it. I imagine that will be a common occurrence until people figure out it's strong points...if it has any.



Sergeant_Lee #15 Posted Apr 01 2016 - 15:53

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 12685 battles
  • 932
  • [PIR8] PIR8
  • Member since:
    03-09-2015

View PostIronclad73, on Apr 01 2016 - 09:40, said:

I only had time for 1 battle in it, not bad so far, of course our team rolled the enemy so fast I didn't need much ammo, but I can see it being a problem in some games.

As I really like the T-25 I was concerned about its lower speed, but it accelerates well, gets up to top speed pretty quickly on level ground, didn't get a chance to try on a hill.

It is lower and smaller than the T-25 so should have better camo. Gun handling is better than than the T-25 which is nice. Looks like it could be a good tank to flank and sneak up close before spotted and shoot and scoot back into cover.

Has the same crew count (5) as the T-25.

Hope to get more battles in tonight and get a better perspective.

 

 

Keep us posted.

Ironclad73 #16 Posted Apr 01 2016 - 17:25

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 22344 battles
  • 3,547
  • [DHO6] DHO6
  • Member since:
    07-26-2014

View PostDeputy276, on Apr 01 2016 - 07:51, said:

Saw one last night, but he died too fast to get any kind of impression of it. I imagine that will be a common occurrence until people figure out it's strong points...if it has any.

 

All depends on if they know how to play it. I do very well in the T-25, Turan seems pretty close to its play style, some improvements with a little slower speed, slightly less hull armor.  You have to avoid hits on both of them, they are not for brawling.

1SLUGGO1 #17 Posted Apr 01 2016 - 19:14

    Major

  • Players
  • 24723 battles
  • 10,198
  • Member since:
    02-23-2012

View PostLegiondude, on Apr 01 2016 - 09:10, said:

It was actually that low, the interior of the tank was quite packed

 

So what?

 

The AMX light tank crews had to exit the vehicle and manually load the next drum after firing off the first set.

There are lots of tanks where there is highly imaginative ideas behind where the ammo is stored.


Edited by 1SLUGGO1, Apr 01 2016 - 19:15.


Legiondude #18 Posted Apr 01 2016 - 19:37

    Major

  • Players
  • 20466 battles
  • 23,190
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    08-22-2011

View Post1SLUGGO1, on Apr 01 2016 - 12:14, said:

 

So what?

 

32 was the number provided by the source data and so 32 is what the programmers used



A_FIELD_MARSHAL #19 Posted Apr 01 2016 - 20:00

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 29121 battles
  • 2,129
  • [REL2] REL2
  • Member since:
    07-21-2010

View PostLegiondude, on Apr 01 2016 - 19:37, said:

 

32 was the number provided by the source data and so 32 is what the programmers used

 

Realistic stats usually dont translate to good tanks. 

 

By Doubling its ammo count is it unhistorical yea. But balanced probably. 

 

This is just another crappy prem tank that no one should buy. 



Unreliable_Babysitter #20 Posted Apr 01 2016 - 21:50

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 4564 battles
  • 133
  • Member since:
    03-07-2014

View PostA_FIELD_MARSHAL, on Apr 02 2016 - 05:00, said:

 

Realistic stats usually dont translate to good tanks. 

 

By Doubling its ammo count is it unhistorical yea. But balanced probably. 

 

This is just another crappy prem tank that no one should buy. 

 

That no one should buy?
Dammit, you've activated my childish mentality to always do the opposite, regardless of how spastic said action might be. I shall buy one, sir!




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users