Jump to content


Removal of Rampage Mode


  • Please log in to reply
309 replies to this topic

Plays_With_Matches #41 Posted Apr 04 2016 - 17:47

    Major

  • Players
  • 29489 battles
  • 2,948
  • [NUFFS] NUFFS
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012

View Postcaptainspetsnaz, on Apr 04 2016 - 11:42, said:

Are you serious right now?? You know how hard ive worked to try yo get the T22 without Rigging??? you know how many hours in queue trying to get a battle and how many hours in battles ive spent trying to get it legally??? and now your just gonna remove it!?! and let all the Riggers keep it? THIS IS [Edited] [Edited] [Edited]!!!!! :angry:

 

Sorry Mate but I'll say it again....

It is a real shame for those player who earn it legitimately, but on the other hand, why would you put that much effort into earning a tank that you knew what the topic of so much controversy?         

5ixty5ix #42 Posted Apr 04 2016 - 17:50

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 25754 battles
  • 304
  • [-UT-] -UT-
  • Member since:
    08-10-2011

I have been on enough clans TS to hear people make the call for "rigging". That's why i left and never came back.

 

That's how 90% of the T-22  owners got their vehicles. We all know it. It's also the reason why I have never even tried Rampage, as all the rigging videos where available a few days after the mode started. 

 

Oddly enough all those same people shown in the videos are still cruising around in their T-22s now that they're done ruining the game mode. 

 

I was actually happy when i thought that WG was going to take action on these people, as stated in QB's video. Instead they are going to laugh even harder now that the T-22 is no longer available, while screwing WG out of income at the same time. Like many people have stated above. I am also done. 



Cl0r0x_4_U #43 Posted Apr 04 2016 - 17:52

    Major

  • Players
  • 28279 battles
  • 2,788
  • Member since:
    04-29-2012

View PostGord1973, on Apr 04 2016 - 08:47, said:

 

Sorry Mate but I'll say it again....

It is a real shame for those player who earn it legitimately, but on the other hand, why would you put that much effort into earning a tank that you knew what the topic of so much controversy?         

 

because I never have time in real life to do any CW events that have reward tanks.. This and the personal missions (Which are pretty hard after T55A missions) is the only way for me to get something special not many other people have.. plus its a pretty good tank.. :( 

Verblonde #44 Posted Apr 04 2016 - 17:53

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 17996 battles
  • 2,978
  • [FUNTB] FUNTB
  • Member since:
    02-08-2015
Apart from a couple of goes out of curiosity when it was first launched, I never played Rampage mode and had no interest in it. Did *anyone* actually get the T22 without rigging?

As things stand, anyone who runs one will be assumed to be a cheat. Why not simply remove *all* the existing T22s from the game (Although that sucks for anyone who did get it honestly) and then, as suggested previously, introduce a new set of personal missions to get it?

norby16 #45 Posted Apr 04 2016 - 17:54

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 20734 battles
  • 320
  • Member since:
    11-22-2013

View Post5ixty5ix, on Apr 04 2016 - 16:50, said:

I have been on enough clans TS to hear people make the call for "rigging". That's why i left and never came back.

 

That's how 90% of the T-22  owners got their vehicles. We all know it. It's also the reason why I have never even tried Rampage, as all the rigging videos where available a few days after the mode started. 

 

Oddly enough all those same people shown in the videos are still cruising around in their T-22s now that they're done ruining the game mode. 

 

I was actually happy when i thought that WG was going to take action on these people, as stated in QB's video. Instead they are going to laugh even harder now that the T-22 is no longer available, while screwing WG out of income at the same time. Like many people have stated above. I am also done. 

 

Just wanted to add that the other 10% got their vehicles by renting a rigger to play their account on ebay. :)

I really hope all the players that rigged or intend to get the tank in time. It makes for easy spotting of who's a cheater or not.



Verblonde #46 Posted Apr 04 2016 - 17:57

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 17996 battles
  • 2,978
  • [FUNTB] FUNTB
  • Member since:
    02-08-2015

View PostGhostPrime, on Apr 04 2016 - 11:45, said:

 

Please understand we don't condone the "rigging" of the game. 

 

It does rather appear to me that this is emphatically not the same as actually doing anything about it though!

If WG cared about eliminating cheating, mods would have been outlawed and effectively policed long ago...



Backfire_ #47 Posted Apr 04 2016 - 17:58

    Major

  • Players
  • 29829 battles
  • 2,364
  • [RDDT] RDDT
  • Member since:
    03-08-2013

Horray and finally!

 

All things considered this is probably the best realistic solution to a thorn in this game's side. 



Iron_Tsunami #48 Posted Apr 04 2016 - 17:59

    Major

  • Players
  • 40588 battles
  • 3,019
  • [MOVE] MOVE
  • Member since:
    04-29-2012
T-22 is literally an unstoppable rape train. Will be glad to see this thing nerfed to the ground.

Rommel85 #49 Posted Apr 04 2016 - 18:00

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 23388 battles
  • 473
  • [_D_] _D_
  • Member since:
    04-02-2012
I am upset that I am about half way done with doing the missions legitimately, but now its all for nothing.  I wasted so much time just waiting in queue for a game to go.

Gn0sis #50 Posted Apr 04 2016 - 18:02

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 16000 battles
  • 89
  • Member since:
    06-26-2012
this is really f'ed up for the people who actually spent A LOT of time trying to do these missions legitimately.... they get the biggest shaft

Hellsfog #51 Posted Apr 04 2016 - 18:04

    Major

  • Players
  • 37638 battles
  • 6,129
  • [VILIN] VILIN
  • Member since:
    06-22-2011
Rampage mode is crap.  My only regret is losing all these salty posts.  Good bye T22, the tank that farms tears twice as fast can only last half as long. 

HELIONIST #52 Posted Apr 04 2016 - 18:04

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 12915 battles
  • 401
  • [-G-] -G-
  • Member since:
    03-02-2014
Remove the tank ..DELETE IT .....thats what you people should have done long time ago and not act like nothing happened all this time .

wildcat18 #53 Posted Apr 04 2016 - 18:12

    Captain

  • Players
  • 15485 battles
  • 1,681
  • Member since:
    07-03-2011

View PostGhostPrime, on Apr 04 2016 - 11:45, said:

 

Please understand we don't condone the "rigging" of the game.

 

 

That doesn't mean that these features will be in random battles. that would be a big change. Any changes that may occur will be in future announcements, and we will have tests IF anything were to ever occur, so we can get feedback from everyone.

 

So glad I walked away from this game, what a mess you all made of it.

ShadowDancer27 #54 Posted Apr 04 2016 - 18:13

    Major

  • Players
  • 28264 battles
  • 3,555
  • Member since:
    07-26-2013

Outside of the strong opinions on the T-22.  I didn't happen to ever rampage since my clan tends to play lower tiers and it didn't sound like a solo friendly playground.

 

1) Can we sell the rampage mode tanks the gave us and get anything out of doing so?  Amy modules common the mainstream tanks?  Ammo?

2) If we have crew stashed in the rampage mode tanks they go in our barracks?  It seemed sort of stupid that an AMX 50B crew took a stat hit in the AMX 50B ® and vice-versa.  All these rentals, rampage tanks and their crews have made my barracks and garage a bit confusing at times and my OCD wants to clean house. 



minim8greyhound #55 Posted Apr 04 2016 - 18:14

    Major

  • Players
  • 15065 battles
  • 2,448
  • [_SOC_] _SOC_
  • Member since:
    07-01-2011
T-22 should be made into a bonus campaign for random battle missions.

mlinke #56 Posted Apr 04 2016 - 18:15

    Captain

  • Players
  • 52709 battles
  • 1,372
  • [DD-S] DD-S
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011

Crap ! All riggers got t22, after that it was impossible to get a game, I was stuck and could not get it!

 

WG gives us LTP pos for 5 year honor, why did u not give us all t22??? 


Edited by mlinke, Apr 04 2016 - 18:15.


DDsSmokeOverpenRNGBounce #57 Posted Apr 04 2016 - 18:16

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 20452 battles
  • 602
  • [ESPRT] ESPRT
  • Member since:
    08-14-2011

I liked rampage.  Yes, it was too expensive to run it and the rewards were poor, but I found it an enjoyable, low-stress/faster-paced way to play tanks.  

 

As far as the Unbalanced-22, it was a terrible idea to begin with.  It's good that WG recognizes that.  What is not good, though, is that WG made a lot of people work very hard for the tank.  They have to take that into consideration.

 

I never went for the T-22 myself, but it's only fair that they compensate those who relied on WG's inducements to get this "deliberately OP tank."

 

In short, getting rid of the T-22 in its present form is good for the game, but unfair to those who put the time in to get one.  Concerning mission rigging to get them, I blame WG for creating the motivation to rig: When the prize is sufficiently tempting, people will resort to anything to get it.



otacon237 #58 Posted Apr 04 2016 - 18:17

    Major

  • Players
  • 25222 battles
  • 4,370
  • Member since:
    01-08-2012

All I can say is LOOOOOOOL


 

​about damn time they put the GOOD new maps in a mode people actually play, ofc they will be "reworked" meaning turned into corridor maps:facepalm:


 

​kinda wish I had a way to get the t-22 and fem crews, nerf is probably needed but not like it will teach the rigging scumbags a lesson

typical wg too little too late

 



MercuryBlack #59 Posted Apr 04 2016 - 18:17

    Major

  • Players
  • 18922 battles
  • 4,978
  • Member since:
    06-12-2012
Remove the T-22 in it's entirety. No rebalance. No compensation. Do *NOT* compromise with riggers.

mattwong #60 Posted Apr 04 2016 - 18:19

    Major

  • Players
  • 30470 battles
  • 17,333
  • Member since:
    03-03-2012
The people crying about the T-22 being nerfed make me laugh.  They were the ones insisting it's not OP and not a rigger's tank, and calling everyone else "salty" for saying that it was.  It's so OP that WG publicly said flat-out that it's blatantly OP: something they generally don't do.




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users