Jump to content


E-100's 150 gun stats unveiled + all stats


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
255 replies to this topic

Poll: Choices (256 members have cast votes)

Now that I saw the stats...

  1. I'll pick one up and use it as my "main" tank (118 votes [46.09%])

    Percentage of vote: 46.09%

  2. I'll get one to mess around with (93 votes [36.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 36.33%

  3. I'm not bothering, as it's outclassed (for what reason, like Clan Wars competition, weapon stats, armor?) (45 votes [17.58%])

    Percentage of vote: 17.58%

Vote Hide poll

Drseckzytime #1 Posted Jul 22 2011 - 23:11

    Major

  • Players
  • 16120 battles
  • 2,192
  • [PBLRD] PBLRD
  • Member since:
    04-04-2011
Posted Image

This is off the RU "open" test server supposedly, so I don't believe it violates anything as I've seen stats posted numerous times before from these, along with vids, and nothing happened.  If there is a problem, sorry.  :Smile-hiding:

Added more stats:

Posted Image

Carlsberg #2 Posted Jul 22 2011 - 23:14

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 8555 battles
  • 310
  • Member since:
    09-21-2010
228penetration with ap, now that makes sence, not like previous 85mm penetration wich was a joke.. :D

Engine_of_War #3 Posted Jul 22 2011 - 23:15

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 10826 battles
  • 840
  • [TAEON] TAEON
  • Member since:
    11-19-2010
not bad really in the pen department sits up there with the rest of its tier 10 brethren. gots the damage of teh 155 AT/BL-10 (750) so it should give a good smack to the target to wake it up.

Now finnaly people will be silenced about the "QQ its derp" cause frankly its not.

Dominatus #4 Posted Jul 22 2011 - 23:16

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 10311 battles
  • 13,793
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    12-21-2010
0.37 accuracy? That's not too bad. Frankly, I think everyone was expecting worse.

teamSG1 #5 Posted Jul 22 2011 - 23:17

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 2892 battles
  • 512
  • Member since:
    03-05-2011
Another big gun to pound the shit outa smaller tanks. :(

AragornSkywalker #6 Posted Jul 22 2011 - 23:17

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 2369 battles
  • 925
  • Member since:
    12-27-2010
Deleted, my bad.

Camels #7 Posted Jul 22 2011 - 23:17

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 27178 battles
  • 706
  • Member since:
    09-14-2010
So y choice this over the t 30, just curious.

AragornSkywalker #8 Posted Jul 22 2011 - 23:19

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 2369 battles
  • 925
  • Member since:
    12-27-2010

View PostCamels, on Jul 22 2011 - 23:17, said:

So y choice this over the t 30, just curious.

Deleted - My bad. same rof.

E100 is much better armored, so it cant have the same firepower as a glass cannon.

Carlsberg #9 Posted Jul 22 2011 - 23:23

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 8555 battles
  • 310
  • Member since:
    09-21-2010
i bet it will have a huge hole somethere in the front to make it up ;D
/jk i am going to buy one :>

Young_otter_91 #10 Posted Jul 22 2011 - 23:30

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 13604 battles
  • 568
  • [PONYS] PONYS
  • Member since:
    03-29-2011
sweet!! I can't wait!

XenomorphZZ #11 Posted Jul 22 2011 - 23:33

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 12556 battles
  • 4,665
  • [RSRC] RSRC
  • Member since:
    01-24-2011
E-100... for all intents and purposes... is an inverted T30...

Same gun, opposite armor placement... the E-100s hull is decent... but turret is lack luster on all sides except the front, and the gun mantle is a huge weak point.

I personally prefered the "HE only" verision of the gun, it would of brought a new dimension to the damage dealing aspect of the Tier Xs...

Oh well...

Hotwired #12 Posted Jul 22 2011 - 23:39

    Captain

  • Beta Testers
  • 20 battles
  • 1,054
  • Member since:
    09-12-2010

View PostCamels, on Jul 22 2011 - 23:17, said:

So y choice this over the t 30, just curious.

Because the T30 has 276mm of penetration and thus almost never has a reason to use HE.

THIS has 228mm of penetration which doesn't really cut it if you meet tough armour at T9 and T10 so you're going to have to pull out the HE more often.

AragornSkywalker #13 Posted Jul 22 2011 - 23:42

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Testers
  • 2369 battles
  • 925
  • Member since:
    12-27-2010

View PostXenomorphZZ, on Jul 22 2011 - 23:33, said:

E-100... for all intents and purposes... is an inverted T30...

Same gun, opposite armor placement... the E-100s hull is decent... but turret is lack luster on all sides except the front, and the gun mantle is a huge weak point.

I personally prefered the "HE only" verision of the gun, it would of brought a new dimension to the damage dealing aspect of the Tier Xs...

Oh well...

T30 turret is only strong on the front too. Only T32 is well armored all around. T30 is just a T29 turret, which I easily pen on the side with my long 88.

Though I dont know about mantlet weak spot.

BadAtWarships #14 Posted Jul 22 2011 - 23:50

    Sergeant

  • Beta Testers
  • 7948 battles
  • 162
  • Member since:
    12-17-2010
228mm of penetration is acceptable. The only tanks in game that you will struggle to penetrate frontally would be the Maus, T95 and E-100 itself. Should make a great medium killer.

Will_of_Iron #15 Posted Jul 22 2011 - 23:51

    Major

  • Players
  • 29241 battles
  • 3,215
  • [1STBB] 1STBB
  • Member since:
    03-06-2011
well this is probably going to get removed by a Dev just because it violates some area 51 thing but I am liking that gun pretty well. The damage is high so I imagine the penetration is kinda low. It is actually decent both ways. Basically it's a KVs gun with more waaaaaay more penetration. It looks pretty good to me.

uwaz #16 Posted Jul 23 2011 - 00:04

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 25968 battles
  • 307
  • Member since:
    01-28-2011
wait so guys is the E-100 gonna be a good tank now? or still a useless T10 tank?

hectorjr21 #17 Posted Jul 23 2011 - 00:09

    Captain

  • Beta Testers
  • 15580 battles
  • 1,081
  • [SPIDY] SPIDY
  • Member since:
    12-21-2010

View Postuwazpwned, on Jul 23 2011 - 00:04, said:

wait so guys is the E-100 gonna be a good tank now? or still a useless T10 tank?
228 penetration will still struggle against tier 10 tanks.

XenomorphZZ #18 Posted Jul 23 2011 - 00:12

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 12556 battles
  • 4,665
  • [RSRC] RSRC
  • Member since:
    01-24-2011

View Posthectorjr21, on Jul 23 2011 - 00:09, said:

228 penetration will still struggle against tier 10 tanks.

Umm...


View PostLinkNZ, on Jul 22 2011 - 23:50, said:

228mm of penetration is acceptable. The only tanks in game that you will struggle to penetrate frontally would be the Maus, T95 and E-100 itself. Should make a great medium killer.


BlackAngelCom #19 Posted Jul 23 2011 - 00:12

    Captain

  • Players
  • 8901 battles
  • 1,489
  • Member since:
    05-25-2011

View PostCamels, on Jul 22 2011 - 23:17, said:

So y choice this over the t 30, just curious.

T30 will eventually no longer be a choice for a T10 tank. Everyone knows its gun is overpowered including the developers. The thing is a tank destroyer.

And this would be much better than a T30 in a general "tank" role because its turret is tough enough and the front hull is impenetrable with quite decent rear & side hull armor as well (remember the skirt plates...). All the T30 has is a super-strong front turret. Armor is nonexistent everywhere else for something that exclusively fights T7-10 vehicles. Its engine can be knocked out with the stock guns of any Tier 7 medium tank; that won't work on the E100 with the 150mm of rear hull armor.

Being shot in the side or rear is dangerous to the E100 but it's much moreso to the T30 & the M1A2 is vulnerable to that so... :mellow:

mr48 #20 Posted Jul 23 2011 - 00:14

    Captain

  • Beta Testers
  • 16490 battles
  • 1,008
  • [PANSY] PANSY
  • Member since:
    07-13-2010
Ha! Its pretty much exactly what I predicted. The doom-criers should be feeling pretty ridiculous right about now.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users