Jump to content


Chieftain Mk. V


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

Poll: Chieftain Mk. V (31 members have cast votes)

How would you like the Chieftain to be able to be obtained

  1. Clan Wars Reward (4 votes [11.43%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.43%

  2. Personal Missions (3 votes [8.57%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.57%

  3. Tournament (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. Premium Shop (1 vote [2.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.86%

  5. New British Line (15 votes [42.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 42.86%

  6. Replace FV215b (12 votes [34.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 34.29%

Vote Guests cannot vote Hide poll

_Silent #1 Posted Jun 06 2016 - 06:28

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 35524 battles
  • 519
  • [GROOT] GROOT
  • Member since:
    06-28-2014
Tell me what you think and why

WulfeHound #2 Posted Jun 06 2016 - 06:33

    Major

  • Players
  • 12925 battles
  • 26,179
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    04-03-2011
It should have been the 215b (120) replacement instead of the "Super Conqueror", but IMO the best thing would be to have it as a separate line while also getting the Super Conq

BajaJames #3 Posted Jun 06 2016 - 06:39

    Captain

  • Players
  • 75409 battles
  • 1,344
  • [ALERT] ALERT
  • Member since:
    10-29-2012

I like my FV215(B) IMHO they should make another line for the chieftain. 

Also IMHO they should have made the Chieftain/t95 a Heavy it would be like a British t32 with the 90mm


Edited by BajaJames, Jun 06 2016 - 06:40.


_Silent #4 Posted Jun 06 2016 - 06:42

    First lieutenant

  • -Players-
  • 35524 battles
  • 519
  • [GROOT] GROOT
  • Member since:
    06-28-2014
I think Rita did say that the T95/Chieftain was a tier 10 medium the Chieftain/T95 was a tier 8 medium

Yuri_Doujinshi #5 Posted Jun 06 2016 - 06:57

    Major

  • Players
  • 23056 battles
  • 2,971
  • [Y0UJ0] Y0UJ0
  • Member since:
    05-07-2012
CW reward, because I am a greedy [edited] and I want my exclusive tanks.

BajaJames #6 Posted Jun 06 2016 - 07:01

    Captain

  • Players
  • 75409 battles
  • 1,344
  • [ALERT] ALERT
  • Member since:
    10-29-2012

View Post_Silent, on Jun 06 2016 - 05:42, said:

I think Rita did say that the T95/Chieftain was a tier 10 medium the Chieftain/T95 was a tier 8 medium

 

Yeah i saw that about the 95/ chieftain, but IMHO they should of made the Chieftain/95 a heavy 

 

Dont get me wrong i like the chieftain/95 now but if they buffed the tumor a little it would of been a good heavy at teir


Edited by BajaJames, Jun 06 2016 - 07:05.


TrulyGrand #7 Posted Jun 06 2016 - 07:03

    Major

  • Players
  • 34156 battles
  • 4,877
  • [E-50M] E-50M
  • Member since:
    09-18-2013

View PostYuri_Doujinshi, on Jun 05 2016 - 22:57, said:

CW reward, because I am a greedy [edited] and I want my exclusive tanks.

 

it'd be nice if it was, or a second season tier 10 reward (or maybe just replace the Obj 260 with it ?) but that means I would have to find a clam to get one if it was cw .-. 

thandiflight #8 Posted Jun 06 2016 - 07:37

    Major

  • Players
  • 87677 battles
  • 4,421
  • [SIMP] SIMP
  • Member since:
    07-10-2011

Except it is the Chieftain Mk VI...

 

In response to your speculation:

1) possibly

2) unlikely

3) no

4) definitely not - is a Tier X

5) probably - is the most likely option. Highly desireable tank. Free XP to it = income for WG

6) WG has said no to this

 


Edited by thandiflight, Jun 06 2016 - 07:59.


kebab6597 #9 Posted Jun 06 2016 - 09:07

    Major

  • Players
  • 58780 battles
  • 9,134
  • [D-DAY] D-DAY
  • Member since:
    04-16-2011

As a Brit who served on Chieftain IRL i would be pissed if they made it a reward tank that because of time zones i would not be able to get due to CW and tournaments being held in the middle of the night

 

I think it should either replace the 215 as it was meant too or be another researched vehicle that can be earned by everyone not the exclusive toy of the very few as the M60 was






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users