Jump to content


Now I Finally Have Proof


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
141 replies to this topic

WulfeHound #81 Posted Jul 11 2016 - 20:10

    Major

  • Players
  • 12916 battles
  • 26,179
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    04-03-2011

View PostGomez_Adams, on Jul 11 2016 - 13:58, said:

 

Let's review:
  • You use a little girl avatar.

 

Okay, so? (and she's not 'little' at all. She's 16)

 

Block Quote

 

  • You type in little girl sentences.

Typing short sentences is not "girly"

 

Block Quote

 

  • You wear your hair long like a girl.

 

Long hair is not exclusively for women.

 

Block Quote

 

  • You detract from the topic and troll like a little girl.

 

Pot calling the kettle black

(and there we go, again with the sexism)

 

Block Quote

 

  • You don't address the fact you lied...like a girl.

 

Lying is not an exclusively female trait. For example you lied that you're not VladimirsRevenge when all the evidence you've put forth shows that you are.

 

Block Quote

 

  • In spite of all of that, you claim you're not trying to be a girl.

 

 

Because I am not trying to be a girl at all. You got the idea in your head.

 

Block Quote

 

Fact is, you ARE trying very, very hard to be a girl. There are two reasons for that:

  1. You're still struggling with your true self.
  2. You pretend to be a girl because in real life nobody likes you at all, so you think by pretending to be a girl more people will like you online and give you something resembling an actual social life.

 

Either way, you've got issues, pal.

 

No, the fact is I am a guy, am very comfortable with being male, and have no desires to change my gender at all. If I was pretending to be a girl, i would be trying a lot harder than just an avatar.

 

So to sum it up, you're a sexist and misogynist who judges by appearance and assumes based on very little information.


Edited by WulfeHound, Jul 11 2016 - 20:11.


__Worm__ #82 Posted Jul 11 2016 - 20:25

    Major

  • Players
  • 34141 battles
  • 4,546
  • [CUBE] CUBE
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

View Post_Tsavo_, on Jul 11 2016 - 04:59, said:

I'm sensing lots of packet loss

 

ya thats what I was thinking there is a lot going on there in the SS and, I don't have this problem not even with my Tiger 1.

Gomez_Adams #83 Posted Jul 11 2016 - 20:27

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 5 battles
  • 5,402
  • Member since:
    04-06-2015

View PostWulfeHound, on Jul 11 2016 - 15:10, said:

More denial.

 

You're a case study in denial, defensiveness, and detraction.

 

And the girl in that avatar is not 16. She is, at best, 10 or 11. My daughter is 14 and looks like an old maid compared to that image.

 

What you "SAY" an image is and what it looks like are, like your entire persona, COMPLETELY different. The fact that you actually have a minor girl as an image that represents you as an obviously older man is simply disturbing on more levels that I care to think about in their entirety.



aswitz87 #84 Posted Jul 11 2016 - 20:31

    Major

  • Players
  • 5921 battles
  • 6,974
  • Member since:
    06-10-2012

View PostGomez_Adams, on Jul 11 2016 - 13:58, said:

 

Let's review:
  • You use a little girl avatar.
  • You type in little girl sentences.
  • You wear your hair long like a girl.
  • You detract from the topic and troll like a little girl.
  • You don't address the fact you lied...like a girl.
  • In spite of all of that, you claim you're not trying to be a girl.

 

 

Wow, misogynist much...

 

I must be a LEGO Stormtrooper since thats my avatar.  Oh wait... my hit ratio is too high.



WulfeHound #85 Posted Jul 11 2016 - 20:34

    Major

  • Players
  • 12916 battles
  • 26,179
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    04-03-2011

View PostGomez_Adams, on Jul 11 2016 - 14:27, said:

 

You're a case study in denial, defensiveness, and detraction.

 

And the girl in that avatar is not 16. She is, at best, 10 or 11. My daughter is 14 and looks like an old maid compared to that image.

 

What you "SAY" an image is and what it looks like are, like your entire persona, COMPLETELY different. The fact that you actually have a minor girl as an image that represents you as an obviously older man is simply disturbing on more levels that I care to think about in their entirety.

 

Because this is totally someone who's 10 or 11:

Spoiler

 

 

And again, you can make all the claims you like about me, but they are hilariously wrong.



aswitz87 #86 Posted Jul 11 2016 - 20:36

    Major

  • Players
  • 5921 battles
  • 6,974
  • Member since:
    06-10-2012

View PostGomez_Adams, on Jul 11 2016 - 14:27, said:

 

And the girl in that avatar is not 16. She is, at best, 10 or 11. My daughter is 14 and looks like an old maid compared to that image.

 

What you "SAY" an image is and what it looks like are, like your entire persona, COMPLETELY different. The fact that you actually have a minor girl as an image that represents you as an obviously older man is simply disturbing on more levels that I care to think about in their entirety.

I see you are not familiar with Chibi.  Large head to body ratio and larger than normal eyes.  Its an art style choice of some animations (and looks really weird on mechs), and is 100% unrelated to character age.

 

The fact you see it as a minor is your problem.

 

Note: I say this unfamiliar with the source of the image, so will not comment on what age the character actually is.  Nor do I care.  Avatars represent people about as much as politicians.



Gomez_Adams #87 Posted Jul 11 2016 - 20:37

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 5 battles
  • 5,402
  • Member since:
    04-06-2015

View Postaswitz87, on Jul 11 2016 - 15:31, said:

Wow, misogynist much...

 

I must be a LEGO Stormtrooper since thats my avatar.  Oh wait... my hit ratio is too high.

 

Did you use the avatar of a girl and represent yourself as a girl?

 

No.

 

Did you then get defensive over the fact that somebody thought you were a girl?

 

No.

 

Did you then post a picture of your real self, proving to be a grown man of at least mid 20's in age?

 

No.

 

Did you then try to defend yourself for being a man in his mid 20's with a picture of what is DEFINATELY a minor girl as your avatar?

 

No.

 

All of the above applies to him, Not you.

 

And putting the head of a 12-year-old on the body of a 20 year old and claiming it's a 16 year old does NOT make you look good when you're a bearded, toboggan wearing 20 year old.

 

In fact, that's the kind of thing that puts you on the neighborhood watch list.



Nunya_000 #88 Posted Jul 11 2016 - 20:40

    Major

  • Players
  • 21129 battles
  • 13,768
  • [PACNW] PACNW
  • Member since:
    09-20-2013

View PostGomez_Adams, on Jul 11 2016 - 11:27, said:

 

And the girl in that avatar is not 16. She is, at best, 10 or 11. 

 

Personally, I would say she is ageless....since she is a fricking drawing.



mattwong #89 Posted Jul 11 2016 - 20:46

    Major

  • Players
  • 30470 battles
  • 17,333
  • Member since:
    03-03-2012

View PostGomez_Adams, on Jul 11 2016 - 13:58, said:

Let's review:

  • You use a little girl avatar.
  • You type in little girl sentences.
  • You wear your hair long like a girl.
  • You detract from the topic and troll like a little girl.
  • You don't address the fact you lied...like a girl.
  • In spite of all of that, you claim you're not trying to be a girl.

 

Fact is, you ARE trying very, very hard to be a girl. There are two reasons for that:

  1. You're still struggling with your true self.
  2. You pretend to be a girl because in real life nobody likes you at all, so you think by pretending to be a girl more people will like you online and give you something resembling an actual social life.

 

Either way, you've got issues, pal.

 

Or maybe he just thought the avatar was funny or cool, and all of that other nonsense on your list is just you insulting females in general, which is pretty strange for someone who claims to have a daughter.  But we can't all be good fathers, I guess.

 

My avatar is a dog.  Does this mean I'm trying to convince everyone that I'm a dog?



WulfeHound #90 Posted Jul 11 2016 - 20:48

    Major

  • Players
  • 12916 battles
  • 26,179
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    04-03-2011

View PostGomez_Adams, on Jul 11 2016 - 14:37, said:

 

Did you use the avatar of a girl and represent yourself as a girl?

 

 

And that's unique to me, how?

 

Block Quote

 

Did you then get defensive over the fact that somebody thought you were a girl?

 

You would too if someone started accusing you of things you're not. I could start saying you're a lizard person wearing a skin suit.

 

Block Quote

 

Did you then post a picture of your real self, proving to be a grown man of at least mid 20's in age?

 

Because you continued to lie about me.

 

Block Quote

 

Did you then try to defend yourself for being a man in his mid 20's with a picture of what is DEFINATELY a minor girl as your avatar?

 

And that's unique to me how?

 

Block Quote

 

All of the above applies to him, Not you.

 

And I responded the way I did (as you would say it, defensive) because you lied

 

Block Quote

 

And putting the head of a 12-year-old on the body of a 20 year old and claiming it's a 16 year old does NOT make you look good when you're a bearded, toboggan wearing 20 year old.

 

In fact, that's the kind of thing that puts you on the neighborhood watch list.

 

You must not watch anime at all then



aswitz87 #91 Posted Jul 11 2016 - 20:48

    Major

  • Players
  • 5921 battles
  • 6,974
  • Member since:
    06-10-2012

View PostGomez_Adams, on Jul 11 2016 - 14:37, said:

 

Did you use the avatar of a girl and represent yourself as a girl?

 

No.

 

Did you then get defensive over the fact that somebody thought you were a girl?

 

No.

 

Did you then post a picture of your real self, proving to be a grown man of at least mid 20's in age?

 

No.

 

Did you then try to defend yourself for being a man in his mid 20's with a picture of what is DEFINATELY a minor girl as your avatar?

 

No.

 

All of the above applies to him, Not you.

 

And putting the head of a 12-year-old on the body of a 20 year old and claiming it's a 16 year old does NOT make you look good when you're a bearded, toboggan wearing 20 year old.

 

In fact, that's the kind of thing that puts you on the neighborhood watch list.

You listed a bunch of things that can apply to both men and women of any age and then put them as applying to girls.  I'd be worried about some pent up dislike there.

 

Further, the head is ambiguous.  Anime doesn't include super high definition skin textures, so facial features that cause aging differences between 13 and 20s are non existent.  Making any judgement on the age of a character based on the face says more about yourself than the individual who happens to use said image as an avatar.

 

Also... toboggan?  As in a sled?

 

I'm reminded of the 80's when all those folks were so adamantly against gays... and it turned out they were gay themselves and projecting.

 

Let us hope you aren't projecting in this matter, because that is what it appears to be.


Edited by aswitz87, Jul 11 2016 - 20:51.


Gomez_Adams #92 Posted Jul 11 2016 - 20:52

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 5 battles
  • 5,402
  • Member since:
    04-06-2015

No, pal. No they can't.

 

I'm a man. I have a man's image. I never pretended to be anything at all but a man.

 

He is a man in his mid 20's. He uses the image of what appears to be a 12 year old little girl. He then says it's a 16 year old girl. He then goes on to post the image of the 12 year old girls head on a 20 year old woman's body and defend the fact that it's a 16 year old girl while he is in his mid 20's.

 

Sorry. That's just sick. And it's actually illegal in my state...and a good many others.

 

Fact is, he's a grown man admittedly using the imagery of a minor. That, in and of itself, can get you fired, put on a sexual deviant watch list, and possibly jailed in this (the United States) country.



LordCommanderMilitant #93 Posted Jul 11 2016 - 20:59

    Major

  • Players
  • 8597 battles
  • 3,228
  • Member since:
    01-20-2014

View PostGomez_Adams, on Jul 11 2016 - 19:52, said:

No, pal. No they can't.

 

I'm a man. I have a man's image. I never pretended to be anything at all but a man.

 

He is a man in his mid 20's. He uses the image of what appears to be a 12 year old little girl. He then says it's a 16 year old girl. He then goes on to post the image of the 12 year old girls head on a 20 year old woman's body and defend the fact that it's a 16 year old girl while he is in his mid 20's.

 

Sorry. That's just sick. And it's actually illegal in my state...and a good many others.

 

Fact is, he's a grown man admittedly using the imagery of a minor. That, in and of itself, can get you fired, put on a sexual deviant watch list, and possibly jailed in this (the United States) country.

 

You are, in fact, incorrect, because it is not pornographic, exploitative, or sexual in any way. 

 

And it's worth mention that avatar and handle are in no way accurate indicators of a person's gender and/or gender identity.

 

For example, I have a female avatar but use the [usually] masculine title of "Lord" in my handle. At least one of these supposed indicators is incorrect. In that vein as well, am I xenophobic, intolerant, and genocidal?


Edited by LordCommanderMilitant, Jul 11 2016 - 21:07.


Nunya_000 #94 Posted Jul 11 2016 - 20:59

    Major

  • Players
  • 21129 battles
  • 13,768
  • [PACNW] PACNW
  • Member since:
    09-20-2013

View PostGomez_Adams, on Jul 11 2016 - 11:52, said:

 

Fact is, he's a grown man admittedly using the imagery of a minor. That, in and of itself, can get you fired, put on a sexual deviant watch list, and possibly jailed in this (the United States) country.

 

So...using a drawing of a female as an avatar is now a criminal offence in your world?



Nunya_000 #95 Posted Jul 11 2016 - 21:00

    Major

  • Players
  • 21129 battles
  • 13,768
  • [PACNW] PACNW
  • Member since:
    09-20-2013

View Post_Tsavo_, on Jul 11 2016 - 11:53, said:

 

Gomez thought I was a girl as well.  Ha!

 

Nothing new here.....when he starts looking foolish in a discussion his SOP is to attack other posters.

aswitz87 #96 Posted Jul 11 2016 - 21:03

    Major

  • Players
  • 5921 battles
  • 6,974
  • Member since:
    06-10-2012

View PostGomez_Adams, on Jul 11 2016 - 14:52, said:

No, pal. No they can't.

 

I'm a man. I have a man's image. I never pretended to be anything at all but a man.

 

He is a man in his mid 20's. He uses the image of what appears to be a 12 year old little girl. He then says it's a 16 year old girl. He then goes on to post the image of the 12 year old girls head on a 20 year old woman's body and defend the fact that it's a 16 year old girl while he is in his mid 20's.

 

Sorry. That's just sick. And it's actually illegal in my state...and a good many others.

 

Fact is, he's a grown man admittedly using the imagery of a minor. That, in and of itself, can get you fired, put on a sexual deviant watch list, and possibly jailed in this (the United States) country.

 

Really?  Men can't troll, can't type in little sentences, can't wear their hair long, and don't lie? Only :"girls".  Wow you are a misogynist.

 

Lets go with real facts.

Fact 1: animated faces have literally no difference between 12 and the 20s.  It isn't until about 30-40 that they get some lines added to make it clear they are older, and even that can be questionable due to other features

Fact 2: using the image of an animated minor in a non sexual manor is not illegal anywhere in the United States.

 

The fact that you see it as a minor is your problem.  The fact you see someone using the image as sick shows something disturbing in your own mind, and would get YOU put on a watch list if it presented else ware.

I should show this to my old psych professor...


Edited by aswitz87, Jul 11 2016 - 21:06.


Gomez_Adams #97 Posted Jul 11 2016 - 21:07

    Major

  • -Players-
  • 5 battles
  • 5,402
  • Member since:
    04-06-2015

View PostLordCommanderMilitant, on Jul 11 2016 - 15:59, said:

You are, in fact, incorrect, because it is not pornographic, exploitative, or sexual in any way.

 

It is you who are incorrect. Under the law, anyone under the age of 18 is a minor. Anyone under the age of 16 is a child. He is, as an adult, using child imagery. That is against the law, point blank.

 

Not surprisingly, if he were 15, there would be no problem with it. He would be a child displaying the picture of another child.

 

But that's not what he's doing. He's an adult using the imagery of a child as a gratification.

 

If he lived in Georgia, he'd immediately lose his job, be put on the sexual offenders watch list, get a fine, and do probably 6 months probation at least.



WulfeHound #98 Posted Jul 11 2016 - 21:09

    Major

  • Players
  • 12916 battles
  • 26,179
  • [CMFRT] CMFRT
  • Member since:
    04-03-2011
Keep up the personal attacks and libel, it's quite funny

aswitz87 #99 Posted Jul 11 2016 - 21:11

    Major

  • Players
  • 5921 battles
  • 6,974
  • Member since:
    06-10-2012

View PostGomez_Adams, on Jul 11 2016 - 15:07, said:

 

It is you who are incorrect. Under the law, anyone under the age of 18 is a minor. Anyone under the age of 16 is a child. He is, as an adult, using child imagery. That is against the law, point blank.

 

Not surprisingly, if he were 15, there would be no problem with it. He would be a child displaying the picture of another child.

 

But that's not what he's doing. He's an adult using the imagery of a child as a gratification.

 

If he lived in Georgia, he'd immediately lose his job, be put on the sexual offenders watch list, get a fine, and do probably 6 months probation at least.

Read the laws on child images.  Those can only be pursued if it is of a sexual nature or if the parents pursue it.

 

Guess what, not a sexual nature, and I'm pretty sure one has to be alive to have parents.

 

In fact all of the child photograph laws are in regards to pornography (must be sexual in some way) or privacy.  Animated characters don't receive privacy rights.  They don't get any rights.  They are not alive, they are not real.  The only laws that apply to them are in regards to explicit images.

 

 

Just noticed this... what gratification!?  What the heck is wrong with you!  I'm half tempted to send this to someone.  You need serious help.


Edited by aswitz87, Jul 11 2016 - 21:19.


LordCommanderMilitant #100 Posted Jul 11 2016 - 21:13

    Major

  • Players
  • 8597 battles
  • 3,228
  • Member since:
    01-20-2014

View PostGomez_Adams, on Jul 11 2016 - 20:07, said:

 

It is you who are incorrect. Under the law, anyone under the age of 18 is a minor. Anyone under the age of 16 is a child. He is, as an adult, using child imagery. That is against the law, point blank.

 

Not surprisingly, if he were 15, there would be no problem with it. He would be a child displaying the picture of another child.

 

But that's not what he's doing. He's an adult using the imagery of a child as a gratification.

 

If he lived in Georgia, he'd immediately lose his job, be put on the sexual offenders watch list, get a fine, and do probably 6 months probation at least.

 

Uh, it's not. Adults using the imagery of children is not illegal. You are invited to take a walk through any art museum, or watch TV. There are a variety of non-sexual images of children created by artists as art, which are clearly not illegal. A wide variety of TV advertisements, including commercials targeted towards adults by adults, such as automobile commercials, also feature the imagery of children prominently. Images of children also appear in television, movies, and games by adults for adults. For example, there are child characters in Les Miserables, a decidedly adult production.

 

"Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age).  Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. ... Notably, the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity.  A picture of a naked child may constitute illegal child pornography if it is sufficiently sexually suggestive."

 

The image is not sexually suggestive. Also, Heidi-Marie is not an identifiable, actual minor. There you go.


Edited by LordCommanderMilitant, Jul 11 2016 - 21:20.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users