Jump to content


A girl wants to hangout with me. But she has a boyfriend?


  • Please log in to reply
180 replies to this topic

Socialonos_Chronesphyre #141 Posted Sep 23 2016 - 04:01

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 18701 battles
  • 484
  • Member since:
    09-10-2012
Guys I'm not sure what advice to give this guy can anyone help me out on this one?

mattwong #142 Posted Sep 24 2016 - 16:50

    Major

  • Players
  • 30470 battles
  • 17,333
  • Member since:
    03-03-2012

View PostDonward, on Sep 22 2016 - 14:14, said:

You're quoting UW Today?

 

Bwahahahahaha.

 

Oh my. That is just too precious.

 

You realize that the article is about a study published in a peer-reviewed psychology journal, right?  Oh right, you're the type of person who doesn't bother to read an article before passing judgement.

mattwong #143 Posted Sep 24 2016 - 16:51

    Major

  • Players
  • 30470 battles
  • 17,333
  • Member since:
    03-03-2012

View PostSocialonos_Chronesphyre, on Sep 22 2016 - 22:01, said:

Guys I'm not sure what advice to give this guy can anyone help me out on this one?

 

Dude, the advice is obvious: any girl who wants to cheat on her boyfriend is bad news.  Not only do you run the risk of conflict with the boyfriend, but she is obviously not a trustworthy person, so why would you want to do anything with her?

Donward #144 Posted Sep 24 2016 - 20:40

    Major

  • Players
  • 46957 battles
  • 7,083
  • [C-BOO] C-BOO
  • Member since:
    08-29-2011

View Postmattwong, on Sep 24 2016 - 07:50, said:

 

You realize that the article is about a study published in a peer-reviewed psychology journal, right?  Oh right, you're the type of person who doesn't bother to read an article before passing judgement.

 

ZERO FOX GIVEN

 



mattwong #145 Posted Sep 24 2016 - 22:16

    Major

  • Players
  • 30470 battles
  • 17,333
  • Member since:
    03-03-2012
Very mature response to being caught red-handed being dishonest.

Klaatu_Nicto #146 Posted Sep 24 2016 - 22:49

    Major

  • Players
  • 44044 battles
  • 10,732
  • Member since:
    09-21-2012

View Postmattwong, on Sep 24 2016 - 13:16, said:

Very mature response to being caught red-handed being dishonest.

 

The pot calling the kettle black.

Donward #147 Posted Sep 25 2016 - 00:37

    Major

  • Players
  • 46957 battles
  • 7,083
  • [C-BOO] C-BOO
  • Member since:
    08-29-2011

View Postmattwong, on Sep 24 2016 - 13:16, said:

Very mature response to being caught red-handed being dishonest.

And it is still a better post than what you linked.



Slatherer #148 Posted Sep 26 2016 - 01:03

    Major

  • Players
  • 36593 battles
  • 3,577
  • Member since:
    01-21-2014
Soooo... op, what did you end up doing?

mattwong #149 Posted Sep 26 2016 - 15:28

    Major

  • Players
  • 30470 battles
  • 17,333
  • Member since:
    03-03-2012

View PostDonward, on Sep 24 2016 - 18:37, said:

And it is still a better post than what you linked.

 

So a smarmy lie is better than a study published in a peer-reviewed journal?  It's pretty obvious which side of the "science versus anti-intellectuals" divide you come down on.

Klaatu_Nicto #150 Posted Sep 26 2016 - 17:47

    Major

  • Players
  • 44044 battles
  • 10,732
  • Member since:
    09-21-2012

View Postmattwong, on Sep 26 2016 - 06:28, said:

 

So a smarmy lie is better than a study published in a peer-reviewed journal?  It's pretty obvious which side of the "science versus anti-intellectuals" divide you come down on.

 

The New England Journal of Medicine: Peer-Review Fraud — Hacking the Scientific Publication Process
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1512330

 

Publishing: The Peer-Review Scam
http://www.nature.com/news/publishing-the-peer-review-scam-1.16400

 

Is Scientific Peer Review a “Sacred Cow” Ready To Be Slaughtered?
https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/is-scientific-peer-review-a-sacred-cow-ready-to-be-slaughtered/

 

Science’s Big Scandal: Even Legitimate Publishers Are Faking Peer Review
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2015/04/fake_peer_review_scientific_journals_publish_fraudulent_plagiarized_or_nonsense.html



mattwong #151 Posted Sep 26 2016 - 23:14

    Major

  • Players
  • 30470 battles
  • 17,333
  • Member since:
    03-03-2012

I love it: I accused someone of being anti-science, and somebody came along almost immediately to post articles attacking science.

 

Is science perfect?  Of course not.  Is it still vastly superior to any other method of determining the truth?  Absolutely.


Edited by mattwong, Sep 26 2016 - 23:14.


Klaatu_Nicto #152 Posted Sep 26 2016 - 23:45

    Major

  • Players
  • 44044 battles
  • 10,732
  • Member since:
    09-21-2012

View Postmattwong, on Sep 26 2016 - 14:14, said:

I love it: I accused someone of being anti-science, and somebody came along almost immediately to post articles attacking science.

 

Is science perfect?  Of course not.  Is it still vastly superior to any other method of determining the truth?  Absolutely.

 

I'm not attacking science. I'm attacking those who have perverted science such as those those who rely on theory and rely on 'peer review' while ignoring the scientific method and the real data.

Reiko_Nagase #153 Posted Sep 27 2016 - 01:11

    Captain

  • Players
  • 13345 battles
  • 1,003
  • [MAKI] MAKI
  • Member since:
    03-19-2012
Why is this cancer topic still open? Who even cares. Girls are overrated and so is sex.

Donward #154 Posted Sep 27 2016 - 01:53

    Major

  • Players
  • 46957 battles
  • 7,083
  • [C-BOO] C-BOO
  • Member since:
    08-29-2011

View Postmattwong, on Sep 26 2016 - 06:28, said:

 

So a smarmy lie is better than a study published in a peer-reviewed journal?  It's pretty obvious which side of the "science versus anti-intellectuals" divide you come down on.

 

Wait. So you insult Gseries. And I'm supposed to spend 5 to 15 minutes reading a study on the UW Today website?

 

Yeah.

 


Edited by Donward, Sep 27 2016 - 02:00.


Slatherer #155 Posted Sep 27 2016 - 01:58

    Major

  • Players
  • 36593 battles
  • 3,577
  • Member since:
    01-21-2014
I guess there is no end to this story. What a shame.  GG op.

Klaatu_Nicto #156 Posted Sep 27 2016 - 02:32

    Major

  • Players
  • 44044 battles
  • 10,732
  • Member since:
    09-21-2012

View PostSlatherer, on Sep 26 2016 - 16:58, said:

I guess there is no end to this story. What a shame.  GG op.

 

This topic has a theme song.

 



Nunya_000 #157 Posted Sep 27 2016 - 20:47

    Major

  • Players
  • 21138 battles
  • 13,772
  • [PACNW] PACNW
  • Member since:
    09-20-2013
It is interesting that someone is asking relationship advice on a forum where the only naked girl most members have seen have a staple in their navel.

Blackgunner #158 Posted Sep 28 2016 - 04:50

    Major

  • Beta Testers
  • 13882 battles
  • 3,019
  • [JMO-H] JMO-H
  • Member since:
    01-12-2011

This reminds me of the Denko guy.  Ah, good times.

 

http://vgperson.tumb...nd-to-my-emails


Edited by Blackgunner, Sep 28 2016 - 04:53.


GseriesARFCOM #159 Posted Sep 28 2016 - 06:03

    Major

  • Players
  • 9009 battles
  • 4,557
  • [TROLU] TROLU
  • Member since:
    02-23-2012

View PostKlaatu_Nicto, on Sep 26 2016 - 14:45, said:

 

I'm not attacking science. I'm attacking those who have perverted science such as those those who rely on theory and rely on 'peer review' while ignoring the scientific method and the real data.

 

Matt Wong does a masterful job of quietly avoiding or outright ignoring that which does not fit his skewed yet finely crafted narrative and agenda.

Hiroe #160 Posted Sep 28 2016 - 06:38

    Major

  • Players
  • 13615 battles
  • 4,113
  • Member since:
    09-18-2013

View PostGseriesARFCOM, on Sep 28 2016 - 01:03, said:

 

Matt Wong does a masterful job of quietly avoiding or outright ignoring that which does not fit his skewed yet finely crafted narrative and agenda.

 

Who even cares about most science? It'll all be rewritten in ten or twenty years like it has consistently been throughout history. Rely on your intuition. Our intuition is the product of millions of years of evolution and it won't let us down as much as science has.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users