Jump to content


Why is there two servers for NA?


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

OldFrog75 #21 Posted Aug 11 2017 - 18:32

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 7291 battles
  • 1,616
  • [WCTNT] WCTNT
  • Member since:
    02-23-2017

View PostBlaze_terror, on Oct 25 2016 - 19:26, said:

Wg NA has stated they have a team working on a Central located server they are researching for the best location

 

I think that is the problem - finding a centralized location that will provide the same (or better) level of service as the "local" servers do now.  Personally I'd rather have a smaller player base (West) with a good connection than a larger player base with a mediocre one.

OldFrog75 #22 Posted Aug 11 2017 - 18:34

    Captain

  • -Players-
  • 7291 battles
  • 1,616
  • [WCTNT] WCTNT
  • Member since:
    02-23-2017

View PostMudman24, on Oct 25 2016 - 20:36, said:

Last I knew East was in D.C. And the old central server was in Chicago.  KC would be good. 

 

But WG is going broke and WoT is shutting down...how can they afford all of this and why would they do it?  (sarcasm intended)   :sceptic:

the_Deadly_Bulb #23 Posted Aug 11 2017 - 20:27

    Captain

  • Players
  • 17875 battles
  • 1,801
  • [WCTNT] WCTNT
  • Member since:
    03-11-2014

View PostKapten_Holstrom, on Aug 11 2017 - 09:11, said:

 

​Actually I'm in the East and the ping on the East Coast server is horrible. I prefer playing on the West server. A lot less people but a very good ping and no lag. Even the EU server has better ping than the East server... and no lag whatsoever.

 

What you're actually doing is resurrecting a necrothread. Let it rest. maybe check the dates next time. Last post before yours was over 9 months ago. :sceptic:




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users